A colony of adult bushbabies was assessed for hand preference in order to determine what the proportion of preference for the left and right might be for the population and whether hand preference for individuals was reliable. 25 animals were tested in an apparatus demanding a vertical stance. The population bias was expressed in a distribution skewed toward a left-hand bias. With 16 animals available for retesting, the test-retest reliability coefficient was 0.651, significant at the 0.01 level. When 12 of the original subjects were tested in an apparatus demanding a quadrupedal stance, hand preference shifted to a bimodal distribution. Test-retest reliability was 0.864, significant at the 0.01 level. Significant correlations were not found between the two types of test nor between the two retests. Neither sex nor length of laboratory residence served to predict hand preference. These results were discussed with the view that the postural adjustments required by a bipedal stance may have shaped the development of handedness in humans.

Keywords:
Lesser bushbaby, Hand preference, Quadrupedal stance, Bipedal stance
This content is only available via PDF.
© 1984 S. Karger AG, Basel
1984
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.