Electrolytic lesions were placed in the tractus septomesencephalicus (TSM) and tractus occipitomesencephalicus (TOM), efferent pathways originating in visual and somatosensorimotor areas of the avian telencephalon and distributing widely to brain stem and spinal nuclear regions. Lesion effects upon several aspects of ingestive behavior were examined using high speed cinematography, operant conditioning procedures and monitoring of intake and feeding responses. While there was no evidence for direct effects upon drinking, both TSM and TOM lesions were followed by periods of reduced food intake. Disruptions of feeding in TSM birds were mild and relatively transient but birds were hypophagic for prolonged periods. While there were no deficits in the efficiency or accuracy of their feeding responses or their performance in an operant situation, TSM birds displayed an inappropriate seed ''sorting'' behavior suggestive of lesion effects upon visually controlled food preferences. TOM lesions produced a significant reduction in responsiveness to food (aphagia, hypophagia), impairments in the control of grasping and peck accuracy and a disruption in operant key pecking reinforced by food. These ''sensorimotor'' and ''motivational'' deficits were similar to those seen after damage to central trigeminal structures in the pigeon and suggest that TOM is also a component of a putative ''feeding system'' in the pigeon.

Keywords:
Feeding behavior, Pigeon, Sensorimotor, Extratelencephalic pathways, Tractus septomesencephalicus, Tractus occipitomesencephalus, Aphagia, Hypophagia
This content is only available via PDF.
© 1981 S. Karger AG, Basel
1981
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.