The foveas of nine avian species, initially selected for the presence of a deep fovea and representing a wide range of eye sizes and ecological habits, were studied with quantitative light microscope techniques. Considerable variation was observed in the location and configuration of the avian foveas, although they appeared to be ''convexiclivate'' in shape when compared with the fovea of the rhesus monkey. Comparisons of foveal cell densities (receptor nuclei and ganglion cells) across species showed an increase in the average number of cells/visual degree2 with increasing eye size; similarly, an increase occurred in receptor nuclei relative to ganglion cell density. Thus, smaller eyes showed a coarser retinal grain and a lower ''coincidence ratio'' of receptors to ganglion cells than was found in the largest eyes. There appeared to be no relationship between receptor densities/mm2 and (a) eye size, (b) depth of foveal clivus, or (c) width of foveal clivus. However, a negative correlation was generally observed between the width of the foveal clivus and eye size. Two foveas were seen in the red-tailed hawk, goshawk, sparrow hawk, and least tern. The central fovea was more differentiated, with greater densities of both receptor nuclei and ganglion cells than was observed in the temporal fovea of the same species. Further conclusions, particularly with respect to potential visual acuity, await quantitative measurements of foveal cone densities across species.

This content is only available via PDF.
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.