The auditory efferent system presumably plays a role in enhancing signals in noise and, in particular, speech perception in background noise. This study measured the age-related changes of the medial olivocochlear (MOC) system by comparing distortion product otoacoustic emissions (DPOAEs) with and without contralateral white noise stimulation. Otoacoustic emissions were typically reduced in level (magnitude) when white noise was presented to the contralateral ear. This contralateral suppression (CS) is attributed to activation of the MOC system, which has an inhibitory effect on the outer hair cell (OHC) system. By studying CS on cochlear output in human listeners of different ages, it is possible to describe aging effects on the MOC system. Human subjects were young adult, middle aged and old (n = 10/group). All subjects had normal hearing and middle-ear function based upon standard audiometric criteria. The present study recorded 2f1–f2 DPOAE-grams in response to moderate primary tones (L1 = 75, L2 = 65 dB SPL), from 1 to 6.3 kHz. The principal findings were that DPOAE levels were smaller in the old compared to the young group and that CS declined with age for the middle-aged and old groups. In addition, CS in the 1- to 2-kHz range was greater than in the 4- to 6-kHz range for all ages, but especially for the old group. These findings suggest that a functional decline of the MOC system with age precedes OHC degeneration. Moreover, the MOC system maintains better function in the 1- to 2-kHz range than in the 4- to 6-kHz range as a function of age.

Keywords:
Medial olivocochlear system, Contralateral suppression, Presbycusis, Distortion product otoacoustic emissions, Auditory efferents, Deafness, Outer hair cells, Cochlea
1.
Abdala C, Ma E, Sininger YS: Maturation of medial efferent system function in humans. J Acoust Soc Am 1999;105:2392–2402.
2.
Abdala C, Sininger Y, Ma E: Contralateral suppression of the 2f1–f2 DPOAE in human neonates. Assoc Res Otolaryngol Abstr 1998;21:152.
3.
Avan P, Erre JP, de Casta DL, Aran JM, Popelar J: The efferent-mediated suppression of otoacoustic emissions in awake guinea pigs and its reversible blockage by gentamicin. Exp Brain Res 1996;109:9–16.
4.
Castor X, Veuillet E, Morgan A, Collet L: Influence of aging on active cochlear micromechanical properties and on the medial olivocochlear system in humans. Hear Res 1994;77:1–8.
5.
Dorn PA, Piskorski P, Keefe DH, Neely ST, Gorga MP: On the existence of an age/threshold/frequency interaction in distortion product otoacoustic emissions. J Acoust Soc Am 1998; 104:964–971.
6.
Fex J: Augmentation of cochlear microphonic by stimulation of the cochlea. Acta Otolaryngol 1959;50:540–541.
7.
Fitzgibbons PJ, Gordon-Salant S: Auditory temporal processing in elderly listeners. J Am Acad Audiol 1996;7:183–189.
8.
Frisina RD: Anatomical and neurochemical bases of presbycusis; in Hof PR, Mobbs CV (eds): Functional Neurobiology of Aging. San Diego, Academic Press, 2001, pp 531–547.
9.
Frisina DR, Frisina RD: Speech recognition in noise and presbycusis: Relations to possible neural sites. Hear Res 1997;106:95–104.
10.
Frisina DR, Frisina, RD, Snell KB, Burkard R, Walton JP, Ison JR: Auditory temporal processing during aging; in Hof PR, Mobbs CV (eds): Functional Neurobiology of Aging. San Diego, Academic Press, 2001, pp 565–579.
11.
Frisina RD, Walton JP: Aging of the mouse central auditory system; in Willott JP (ed): Handbook of Mouse Auditory Research: From Behavior to Molecular Biology. New York, CRC Press, 2001, pp 339–380.
12.
Gaskill SA, Brown AN: The behavior of the acoustic distortion product, 2f1–f2, from the human ear and its relation to auditory sensitivity. J Acoust Soc Am 1990;88:821–839.
13.
Gifford ML, Guinan JJ Jr: Effects of electrical stimulation of medial olivocochlear neurons on ipsilateral and contralateral cochlear responses. Hear Res 1987;29:179–194.
14.
Giraud AL, Garnier S, Micheyl C, Lina G, Chays A, Chery-Croze S: Auditory efferents involved in speech-in-noise intelligibility. Neuroreport 1997;8:1779–1783.
15.
Guinan JJ Jr, Gifford ML: Effects of electrical stimulation of efferent olivocochlear neurons on cat auditory nerve fibers. I. Rate-level functions. Hear Res 1988a;33:97–114
16.
Guinan JJ Jr, Gifford ML: Effects of electrical stimulation of efferent olivocochlear neurons on cat auditory nerve fibers. III. Tuning curves and threshold at CF. Hear Res 1988b;37:29–46.
17.
Guinan JJ Jr, Warr WB, Norris BE: Topographic organization of the olivocochlear projections from the lateral and medial zones of the superior olivary complex. J Comp Neurol 1984;226:21–27.
18.
He N-J, Schmiedt RA: Effects of aging on the fine structure of the 2f1–f2 acoustic distortion product. J Acoust Soc Am 1996;99:1002–1015.
19.
Ishii D, Balogh K Jr: Distribution of efferent endings in the organ of Corti. Acta Otolaryngol 1968;66:282–288.
20.
Ison JR, Walton JP, Frisina RD, O’Neill WE: Elicitation and inhibition of the startle reflex by acoustic transients: Studies of age-related changes in temporal processing; in Willott JP (ed): Handbook of Mouse Auditory Research: From Behavior to Molecular Biology. New York, CRC Press, 2001, pp 381–387.
21.
Johnstone B, Patuzzi R, Yates G: Basilar membrane measurements and traveling wave. Hear Res 1986;22:147–153.
22.
Kujawa SG, Glattke TJ, Fallon M, Bobbin RP: Contralateral sound suppresses distortion product otoacoustic emissions through cholinergic mechanisms. Hear Res 1993;68:97–106.
23.
Kujawa SG, Liberman MC: Effects of olivocochlear feedback on distortion product otoacoustic emissions in guinea pig. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol 2001;2:268–278.
24.
Liberman MC: Response properties of cochlear efferent neurons: Monaural versus binaural stimulation and the effects of noise. J Neurophysiol 1988;60:1779–1798.
25.
Liberman MC, Brown MC: Physiology and anatomy of single olivocochlear neurons in the cat. Hear Res 1986;24:17–36.
26.
Lonsbury-Martin BL, Harris FP, Stagner BB, Hawkins MA, Martin GK: Distortion product emissions in humans. I. Basic properties in normally hearing subjects. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl 1990;147:3–14.
27.
Lonsbury-Martin BL, Martin GK: Otoacoustic emissions; in Jahn AM, Santos-Sacchi J (eds): Physiology of the Ear. San Diego, Singular Press, 2001, pp 443–480.
28.
Maison S, Micheyl C, Chays A, Collet L: Medial olivocochlear system stabilizes active cochlear micromechanical properties in humans. Hear Res 1997;113:89–98.
29.
Micheyl C, Collet L: Involvement of the olivocochlear bundle in the detection of tones in noise. J Acoust Soc Am 1996;3:1604–1610.
30.
Morlet T, Collet L, Salle B, Morgon A: Functional maturation of cochlear active mechanisms of the medial olivocochlear system in humans. Acta Otolaryngol 1993;113:271–277.
31.
Moulin A, Collet L, Duclaux R: Contralateral auditory stimulation alters acoustic distortion products in humans. Hear Res 1993;65:193–210.
32.
Nielson LH, Ryan S, Kemp DT: Spontaneous modification of transient evoked otoacoustic emissions – The influence of contralateral noise stimulation. Proc 1st Int Conf, Würzburg, September 1992.
33.
Puel J, Rebillard G: Effect of contralateral stimulation on the distortion product 2f1–f2:Evidence that the medial efferent system is involved. J Acoust Soc Am 1990;87:1630–1635.
34.
Pujol R: Neural anatomy of the cochlea: Development and plasticity; in Jahn AM, Santos-Sacchi J (eds): Physiology of the Ear. San Diego, Singular Press, 2001, pp 515–528.
35.
Rajan R: Electrical stimulation of the inferior colliculus at low rates protects the cochlea from auditory desensitization. Brain Res 1990;506:192–204.
36.
Ryan S, Piron J: Functional maturation of the medial efferent olivocochlear system in human neonates. Acta Otolaryngol 1994;114:485–489.
37.
Schmiedt RA: Cochlear potentials in gerbils: Does the aging cochlea need a jump start? in Verrillo RT (ed): Sensory Research: Multimodal Perspectives. Hillsdale, Erlbaum Assoc, 1993, pp 91–103.
38.
Schmiedt RA: Effects of aging on potassium homeostasis and the endocochlear potential in the gerbil cochlea. Hear Res 1996;102:125–132.
39.
Silman S: The Acoustic Reflex: Basic Principles and Clinical Applications. Orlando, Academic Press, 1984.
40.
Snell KB, Frisina DR: Relationships among age-related differences in gap detection and word recognition. J Acoust Soc Am 2000;107:1615–1626.
41.
Stover L, Norton SJ: The effects of aging on otoacoustic emissions. J Acoust Soc Am 1993;94:2670–2681.
42.
Strouse AL, Ochs MT, Hall JW: Evidence against the influence of aging on distortion-product otoacoustic emissions. J Am Acad Audiol 1996;7:339–345.
43.
Veuillet E, Collet L, Duclaux R: Effect of contralateral acoustic stimulation on active micromechanical properties in human subjects: Dependence on stimulus variables. J Neurophysiol 1991;65:724–735.
44.
Veuillet E, Collet L, Morgan A: Differential effects of ear-canal pressure and contralateral acoustic stimulation on evoked otoacoustic emissions in humans. Hear Res 1992;61:47–55.
45.
Veuillet E, Duverdy-Bertholon F, Collet L: Effect of contralateral acoustic stimulation on the growth of click-evoked otoacoustic emissions in humans. Hear Res 1996;93:128–135.
46.
Walsh EJ, McGee J, McFadden SL, Liberman MC: Long-term effects of sectioning the olivocochlear bundle in neonatal cats. J Neurosci 1998;18:3859–3869.
47.
Walton JP, Frisina RD, O’Neill WE: Age-related alteration in neural processing of silent gaps in the central nucleus of the inferior colliculus in the CBA mouse model of presbycusis. J Neurosci 1998;18:2764–2776.
48.
Warr WB, Guinan JJ Jr: Efferent innervation of the organ of Corti: Two separate systems. Brain Res 1979;173:152–155.
49.
Williams D, Brown A: The effect of contralateral broadband noise on acoustic distortion products from the human ear. Hear Res 1997;104:127–146.
50.
Willott JF: Aging and the Auditory System: Anatomy, Physiology, and Psychophysics. San Diego, Singular Publishing Group, 1991, pp 18–55.
51.
Winslow R, Sachs M: Effect of electrical stimulation of the crossed olivocochlear bundle on auditory nerve response to tones in noise. J Neurophysiol 1987;57:1002–1021.
© 2002 S. Karger AG, Basel
2002
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.