A morphometric analysis of 43 human maculae utriculi is presented. Individual data on the shape, total area and relative area of the pars interna are given. In addition, the sensitivity of the entire macula to shear stimuli in different directions was estimated. The mean area of 39 maculae from adults and children was 4.30 ± 0.30 (SD) mm2. The pars interna was slightly but significantly smaller than the pars externa. The interindividual variability was larger for the shape of the macula than for the total area and the percentage of the pars interna. The estimated responsiveness of the macula was largest for shear directed anteromedially and smallest for shear directed posteriorly. The data are discussed taking into consideration clinical findings on patients with unilateral loss of otolith function.

Keywords:
Vestibulum, Otolith, Utricle, Morphology
1.
Fernandez C, Goldberg JM, Abend WK: Response to static tilts of peripheral neurons innervating otolith organs of the squirrel monkey. J Neurophysiol 1972;35:978–987.
2.
Loe PR, Tomko DL, Werner G: The neural signal of angular head position in primary afferent vestibular nerve axons. J Physiol 1973;230:29–50.
3.
Flock Å: Structure of the macula utriculi with special reference to directional interplay of sensory responses as revealed by morphologic polarization. J Cell Biol 1964;22:413–431.
4.
Löwenstein O, Wersäll J: A functional interpretation of the electron-microscopic structure of the sensory hairs in the cristae of the elasmobranch Raja clavata in terms of directional sensitivity. Nature 1959;184:1807–1808.
5.
Flock Å: Transducing mechanisms in the lateral line canal organ receptors. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol 1965;30:133–145.
6.
Adrian ED: Discharges from vestibular receptors in the cat. J Physiol 1943;101:389–407.
7.
Görner P: Untersuchungen zur Morphologie und Elektrophysiologie des Seitenlinienorgans vom Krallenfrosch (Xenopus laevis Daudin). Z Vergl Physiol 1963;47:316–338.
8.
Lindeman HH: Studies on the Morphology of the Sensory Regions of the Vestibular Apparatus. Berlin, Springer, 1969.
9.
Rosenhall U: Vestibular macular mapping in man. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1972;81:339–351.
10.
Fernandez C, Goldberg JM: Physiology of peripheral neurons innervating otolith organs of the squirrel monkey. I. Response to static tilts and to long-duration centrifugal force. J Neurophysiol 1976;39:970–984.
11.
Ogawa Y, Kushiro K, Zakir M, Sato H, Uchino Y: Neural organization of the utricular macula concerned with innervation of single vestibular neurons in the cat. Neurosci Lett 2000;278:89–92.
12.
Fernandez C, Goldberg JM, Baird RA: The vestibular nerve of the chinchilla. III. Peripheral innervation patterns in the utricular macula. J Neurophysiol 1990;63:767–780.
13.
Dai MJ, Curthoys IS, Halmagyi GM: Linear acceleration perception in the roll plane before and after unilateral vestibular neurectomy. Exp Brain Res 1989;77:315–328.
14.
Tribukait A, Bergenius J, Brantberg K: Subjective visual horizontal during follow-up after unilateral vestibular deafferentation with gentamicin. Acta Otolaryngol 1998;118:479–487.
15.
Halmagyi GM, Curthoys IS, Dai MJ: The effects of unilateral vestibular deafferentation on human otolith function; in Sharpe JA, Barber HO (eds): The Vestibulo-Ocular Reflex and Vertigo. New York, Raven Press, 1993, pp 89–104.
16.
Lempert T, Gresty MA, Bronstein AM: Horizontal linear vestibulo-ocular reflex testing in patients with peripheral vestibular disorders. Ann NY Acad Sci 1999;871:232–247.
17.
Fluur E, Mellström A: Utricular stimulation and oculomotor reactions. Laryngoscope 1970;80:1701–1712.
© 2001 S. Karger AG, Basel
2001
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.