Auditory nerve single-unit population studies have demonstrated that phase locking plays a dominant role in the neural encoding of steady-state speech sounds. Recently, we have reported that the phase-locked activity underlying the human frequency-following response (FFR) could also encode the first two formants of several tonal approximations of steady-state vowels. Since auditory nerve single-unit population studies have also demonstrated that phase locking is used to represent time-varying speech-like sounds, it was reasoned that the phase-locked neural activity underlying the human FFR, likewise, is dynamic enough to represent time-varying sounds. FFRs to a rising and a falling tone were obtained from 8 normal-hearing adults at 95, 85, 75 and 65 dB nHL. Results clearly demonstrated that the human FFR does indeed follow the trajectory of the rising and falling tones. Also, amplitude changes in the FFR supported the view that neural phase locking decreases with increasing frequency. Finally, the relatively smaller FFR amplitude for the falling tone compared to its rising counterpart lends further support to the notion that rising tones produce greater neural synchrony than falling tones. These results indicate that the human FFR may be used to evaluate encoding of time-varying speech sounds like diphthongs and certain consonant-vowel syllables.

Keywords:
Neural phase locking, Steady-state vowels, Time-variant vowels
1.
Ananthanarayan AK, Durrant JD: The frequency-following response and the onset response: Evaluation of frequency specificity using a forward-masking paradigm. Ear Hear 1992;13:228–233.
2.
Chertoff ME, Hecox KE: Auditory nonlinearities measured with auditory evoked potentials. J Acoust Soc Am 1990;87:1248–1254.
3.
Chertoff ME, Hecox KE, Goldstein R: Auditory distortion products measured with averaged auditory evoked potentials. J Speech Hear Res 1992;35:157–166.
4.
Collins MJ, Cullen JK: Temporal integration of tone glides. J Acoust Soc Am 1978;63:469–473.
5.
Cullen JK, Collins MJ: Rate effects in the detection of short duration tonal glides. J Acoust Soc Am 1979;65(suppl 1):S38.
6.
Gardi J, Merzenich M, Mckean C: Origins of the scalp-recorded frequency-following response in the cat. Audiology 1979a;18:353–381.
7.
Gardi J, Salamy A, Mendelson T: Scalp recorded frequency-following responses in neonates. Audiology 1979b;18:494–506.
8.
Glaser EM, Suter CM, Dasheiff R, Goldberg A: The human frequency following response: Its behavior during continuous stimulation. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1976;40:25–32.
9.
Greenberg S, Marsh JT, Brown WS, Smith JC: Neural temporal coding of low pitch. I. Human frequency following responses to complex tone. Hear Res 1987;25:91–114.
10.
Hall JW: Auditory brainstem frequency following responses to waveform envelope periodicity. Science 1979;205:1297–1299.
11.
Jacobson R, Fant G, Halle M: Preliminaries to Speech Analysis. Cambridge, MIT Press, 1963.
12.
Kiang NYS, Watanabe T, Thomas EC, Clark LF: Discharge Patterns of Single Fibers in the Cat’s Auditory Nerve. Res Monogr. Cambridge, MIT Press, 1965, vol 35.
13.
Krishnan A: Human frequency-following responses to two-tone approximations of steady-state vowels. Audiol Neurootol 1999;4:95–103.
14.
Marsh JT, Brown WS, Smith JC: Differential brainstem pathways for the conduction of auditory frequency following responses. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1974;38:415–422.
15.
Miller MI, Sachs MB: Representation of stop consonants in the discharge patterns of auditory-nerve fibers. J Acoust Soc Am 1983;74:502–517.
16.
Miller MI, Sachs MB: Representation of voice pitch in discharge patterns of auditory-nerve fibers. Hear Res 1984;14:257–279.
17.
Moushegian G, Rupert AL, Stillman RD: Scalp recorded early responses in man to frequencies in the speech range. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1973;35:665–667.
18.
Reale RA, Geisler CD: Auditory-nerve fiber encoding of two-tone approximations to steady-state vowels. J Acoust Soc Am 1980;67:891–902.
19.
Rickman MD, Chertoff ME, Hecox KE: Electrophysiological evidence of nonlinear distortion products to two-tone stimuli. J Acoust Soc Am 1991;89:818–826.
20.
Ryan A, Miller J: Single unit responses in the inferior colliculus of the awake and performing rhesus monkey. Exp Brain Res 1978;32:389–407.
21.
Sachs MB, Voight HF, Young ED: Auditory nerve representation of vowels in background noise. J Neurophysiol 1983;50:27–45.
22.
Shofner WP, Young ED: Excitatory/inhibitory response types in the cochlear nucleus: Relationships to discharge patterns and responses to electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve. J Neurophysiol 1985;54:917–939.
23.
Shore SE, Clopton BM, Yolande NA: Unit responses in ventral cochlear nucleus reflect cochlear coding of rapid frequency sweeps. J Acoust Soc Am 1987;82:471–478.
24.
Shore SE, Cullen JK: Cochlear microphonic resonses of the peripheral auditory system to frequency-varying signals. Am J Otolaryngol 1984;5:34–42.
25.
Shore SE, Nuttall AL: High synchrony compound action potentials evoked by rising frequency-swept tonebursts. J Acoust Soc Am 1985;78:1286–1295.
26.
Sinex DG, Geisler CD: Auditory-nerve fiber responses to frequency-modulated tones. Hear Res 1981;4:127–148.
27.
Sinex DG, Geisler CD: Responses of auditory-nerve fibers to consonant-vowel syllables. J Acoust Soc Am 1984;73:602–615.
28.
Smith JC, Marsh JT, Brown WS: Far-field recorded frequency following responses: Evidence for the locus of brainstem sources. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1975;39:465–472.
29.
Voight HF, Sachs MB, Young ED: Representation of whispered vowels in the discharge patterns of auditory-nerve fibers. Hear Res 1982;8:49–58.
30.
Young ED: Response characteristics of neurons of the cochlear nuclei; in Berlin CI (ed): Hearing Science. San Diego, College-Hill Press, 1984, pp 423–460.
31.
Young ED, Sachs MB: Representation of steady-state vowels in the temporal aspects of the discharge patterns of populations of auditory-nerve fibers. J Acoust Soc Am 1979;66:1381–1403.
32.
Young ED, Voight HF: Response properties of type II and type III units in dorsal cochlear nucleus. Hear Res 1982;6:153–169.
33.
Worden FG, Marsh JT: Frequency following (microphonic-like) neural responses evoked by sound. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1968;25:45–52.
© 2000 S. Karger AG, Basel
2000
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.