The present study addressed the pre-attentive processing of sound order. Event-related potentials were recorded from reading subjects while they were presented with pairs of two tones differing from each other in frequency (1000 vs. 1500 Hz). The within-pair (silent) interstimulus interval (ISI) was, in separate blocks, varied between 0 and 245 ms to determine the minimum separation in time needed for detecting the reversed order of the two frequencies. In standard tone pairs (p = 0.9), the frequencies were in an ascending order, whereas in the deviant pairs (p = 0.1), their order was reversed. Tone durations of 5 and 20 ms were employed in separate experiments. With the 20-ms stimulus duration, the change-specific mismatch negativity (MMN) component was elicited with all within-pair ISIs employed (0, 10, 30, 90 ms). With the 5-ms stimulus duration, however, MMN was elicited only with the 245-ms ISI but not with 95-ms or shorter ISIs. These results show that increased stimulus duration considerably improves perceiving the order of two tones at the pre-attentive level. They also indicate that the accuracy of the processing of temporal information can be probed with MMN. This finding, together with the fact that MMN elicitation does not require the subject’s voluntary attention, suggests that MMN might be used in the assessment of temporal processing deficits in clinical disorders in which patients are not motivated or able to give their verbal or motor response.

Keywords:
Auditory information, Temporal processing, Complex tones, Human, Event-related potentials, Mismatch negativity
This content is only available via PDF.
1999
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.