Introduction: Our purpose was to investigate binaural integration for spectrally degraded speech in normal-hearing (NH) subjects, single-sided deafness (SSD) cochlear implant (CI) recipients, and bilateral deaf bilateral CI recipients. Methods: We tested ten adult subjects in each group with a modified version of the binaural fusion test according to Matzker. Speech recognition was assessed for monotic listening with the better-hearing ear or CI, monotic listening with the poorer-hearing ear or CI, and dichotic listening. We employed two presentation modes: (1) low pass (LP)-filtered speech to the better ear or CI and high pass (HP)-filtered speech to the poorer ear or CI, and (2) LP-filtered speech to the poorer ear or CI and HP-filtered speech to the better ear or CI. Five magnitudes of LP and HP filtering, i.e., spectral degradation, for each presentation mode were applied yielding two spectrally overlapping and three nonoverlapping presentation conditions. Sentences from the Oldenburg Children’s sentence test were applied to assess speech recognition. Results: NH subjects, SSD CI recipients, and bilateral CI recipients were able to understand spectrally degraded speech under both monotic and dichotic listening conditions for both the presentation modes. Speech performance decreased with the increasing loss of spectral information in all the three subject groups. In the NH subjects, speech recognition scores significantly improved for dichotic compared with each monotic listening type under two spectrally nonoverlapping conditions. The SSD CI subjects showed a significant improvement in speech scores for dichotic listening compared with monotic listening with the NH ear under one nonoverlapping condition, i.e., a dichotic benefit in speech recognition with CI. We saw a dichotic benefit in the bilateral CI recipients who achieved significantly better speech scores for dichotic compared with monotic listening with the better CI in three nonoverlapping conditions. Conclusions: All the three groups (NH subjects, SSD CI recipients, and BiCI recipients) showed binaural integration for the side-separated presentation of spectrally degraded speech. Use of strictly side-separated dichotic stimulus presentation avoided the possible occurrence of physical effects such as the head shadow effect and therefore, confirmed the binaural benefit attributable to central binaural processing.

1.
Arndt
S
,
Aschendorff
A
,
Laszig
R
,
Beck
R
,
Schild
C
,
Kroeger
S
,
Comparison of pseudobinaural hearing to real binaural hearing rehabilitation after cochlear implantation in patients with unilateral deafness and tinnitus
.
Otol Neurotol
.
2011a
;
32
:
39
47
.
2.
Arndt
S
,
Laszig
R
,
Aschendorff
A
,
Beck
R
,
Schild
C
,
Hassepaß
F
,
[Unilateral deafness and cochlear implantation: audiological diagnostic evaluation and outcomes]
.
HNO
.
2011b
;
59
:
437
46
. German.
3.
Arndt
S
,
Laszig
R
,
Aschendorff
A
,
Hassepass
F
,
Beck
R
,
Wesarg
T
.
Cochlear implant treatment of patients with single-sided deafness or asymmetric hearing loss
.
HNO
.
2017
;
65(Suppl 2)
:
98
108
.
4.
Avan
P
,
Giraudet
F
,
Büki
B
.
Importance of binaural hearing
.
Audiol Neurotol
.
2015
;
20
(
Suppl 1
):
3
6
. .
5.
Bellis
J
.
Assessment and Management of Central Auditory Processing Disorders in the Educational Setting: From Science to Practice
. 2nd ed.
Clifton Park, NY
:
Delmar Cengage Learning
;
2003
.
6.
Blamey
P
,
Artieres
F
,
Başkent
D
,
Bergeron
F
,
Beynon
A
,
Burke
E
,
Factors affecting auditory performance of postlinguistically deaf adults using cochlear implants: an update with 2,251 patients
.
Audiol Neurotol
.
2013
;
18
:
36
47
.
7.
Bocca
E
,
Calearo
C
.
Central hearing processes
. In Jerger J (ed.).
Modern Developments in Audiology
.
New York
:
Academic Press
;
1963
. p.
337
70
.
8.
Bronkhorst
AW
.
The cocktail-party problem revisited: early processing and selection of multi-talker speech
.
Atten Percept Psychophys
.
2015
;
77
:
1465
87
. .
9.
Buechner
A
,
Brendel
M
,
Lesinski-Schiedat
A
,
Wenzel
G
,
Frohne-Buechner
C
,
Jaeger
B
,
Cochlear implantation in unilateral deaf subjects associated with ipsilateral tinnitus
.
Otol Neurotol
.
2010
;
31
:
1381
5
.
10.
Cone-Wesson
B
,
Ma
E
,
Fowler
CG
.
Effect of stimulus level and frequency on ABR and MLR binaural interaction in human neonates
.
Hear Res
.
1997
;
106
:
163
78
. .
11.
Feldmann
H
.
[Investigations on the discrimination of different sound patterns in simulataneous, monaural and binaural functions]
.
Arch Ohren Nasen Kehlkopfheilkd
.
1960
;
176
:
601
5
. German. .
12.
Furst
M
,
Bresloff
I
,
Levine
RA
,
Merlob
PL
,
Attias
JJ
.
Interaural time coincidence detectors are present at birth: evidence from binaural interaction
.
Hear Res
.
2004
;
187
:
63
72
. .
13.
Furst
M
,
Eyal
S
,
Korczyn
AD
.
Prediction of binaural click lateralization by brainstem auditory evoked potentials
.
Hear Res
.
1990
;
49
:
347
59
. .
14.
Gartrell
BC
,
Jones
HG
,
Kan
A
,
Buhr-Lawler
M
,
Gubbels
SP
,
Litovsky
RY
.
Investigating long-term effects of cochlear implantation in single-sided deafness: a best practice model for longitudinal assessment of spatial hearing abilities and tinnitus handicap
.
Otol Neurotol
.
2014
;
35
:
1525
32
. .
15.
Hol
MK
,
Kunst
SJ
,
Snik
AF
,
Bosman
AJ
,
Mylanus
EA
,
Cremers
CW
.
Bone-anchored hearing aids in patients with acquired and congenital unilateral inner ear deafness (Baha CROS): clinical evaluation of 56 cases
.
Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol
.
2010
;
119
:
447
54
. .
16.
Jesteadt W, Wier C. Comparison of monaural and binaural discrimination of intensity and frequency. J Acoust Soc Am. 1977;61:1599–603.
17.
Kitterick
PT
,
Lucas
L
.
Predicting speech perception outcomes following cochlear implantation in adults with unilateral deafness or highly asymmetric hearing loss
.
Cochlear Implants Int
.
2016
;
17
(
Suppl 1
):
51
4
. .
18.
Koopmann
M
,
Lesinski-Schiedat
A
,
Illg
A
.
Speech perception, dichotic listening, and ear advantage in simultaneous bilateral cochlear implanted children
.
Otol Neurotol
.
2020
;
41
:
e208
15
. .
19.
Laumen
G
,
Ferber
AT
,
Klump
GM
,
Tollin
DJ
.
The physiological basis and clinical use of the binaural interaction component of the auditory brainstem response
.
Ear Hear
.
2016 Sep
;
37
(
5
):
e276
90
. .
20.
Mani
A
,
Loizou
PC
,
Shoup
A
,
Roland
P
,
Kruger
P
.
Dichotic speech recognition by bilateral cochlear implant users
.
Int Congress Ser
.
2004
;
1273
:
466
9
. .
21.
Martin
FN
,
Clark
JG
.
Audiologic detection of auditory processing disorders in children
.
J Am Audiol Soc
.
1977
;
3
:
140
6
.
22.
Matzker
J
.
Ein binauraler Hörsynthese-Test zum Nachweis cerebraler Hörstörungen
.
Stuttgart
:
Thieme
;
1958
.
23.
Matzker
J
,
Ruckes
J
.
[Diagnosis of morphologically demonstrable brain stem diseases by a new hearing test]
.
Dtsch Med Wochenschr
.
1957
;
82
:
2187
94
. German.
24.
Mendel
LL
,
Danhauer
JL
,
Singh
S
.
Singular’s Illustrated Dictionary of Audiology
.
San Diego, CA
:
Singular
;
1999
.
25.
Neumann
K
,
Baumeister
N
,
Baumann
U
,
Sick
U
,
Euler
HA
,
Weissgerber
T
.
Speech audiometry in quiet with the Oldenburg Sentence Test for Children
.
Int J Audiol
.
2012
;
51
:
157
63
. .
26.
Nogueira
W
,
Cosatti
G
,
Schierholz
I
,
Egger
M
,
Mirkovic
B
,
Buchner
A
.
Toward decoding selective attention from single-trial EEG data in cochlear implant users
.
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng
.
2020
;
67
:
38
49
. .
27.
Obuchi
C
,
Shiroma
M
,
Ogane
S
,
Kaga
K
.
Binaural integration abilities in bilateral cochlear implant user
.
J Otol
.
2015
;
10
:
150
3
. .
28.
Speck
I
,
Challier
P
,
Wesarg
T
,
Jakob
TF
,
Aschendorff
A
,
Hassepass
F
,
Is the cochlear implant a successful long-term solution for single-sided deaf and asymmetric hearing-impaired patients?
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol
.
2021
;
278
:
3257
65
.
29.
Stollman
MHP
,
Snik
AFM
,
Hombergen
GCJH
,
Nieuwenhuys
R
,
Ten Koppel
P
.
Detection of the binaural interaction component in the auditory brainstem response
.
Br J Audiol
.
1996
;
30
:
227
32
.
30.
Távora-Vieira
D
,
Rajan
GP
,
Van De Heyning
P
,
Mertens
G
.
Evaluating the long-term hearing outcomes of cochlear implant users with single-sided deafness
.
Otol Neurotol
.
2019
;
40
:
e575
80
. .
31.
Uttenweiler
V
.
Dichotischer Diskriminationstest für Kinder
.
Sprache Stimme Gehör
.
1980
;
4
:
107
11
.
32.
Vannson
N
,
Innes-Brown
H
,
Marozeau
J
.
Dichotic listening can improve perceived clarity of music in cochlear implant users
.
Trends Hear
.
2015
;
19
:
2331216515598971
. .
33.
Wagener
K
,
Brand
T
,
Kollmeier
B
.
Entwicklung und Evaluation eines Satztests in deutscher Sprache III: Evaluation des Oldenburger Satztests
.
Z Audiol
.
1999a
;
38
:
86
95
.
34.
Wagener
K
,
Kühnel
V
,
Kollmeier
B
.
Entwicklung und Evaluation eines Satztests in deutscher Sprache I: Design des Oldenburger Satztests
.
Z Audiol
.
1999b
;
38
:
4
15
.
35.
Wesarg
T
,
Arndt
S
,
Alballaa
AS
,
Rauch
AK
,
Laszig
R
,
Aschendorff
A
,
[Dichotic speech recognition with cochlear implants]
.
HNO
.
2019
;
67
:
769
77
. German.
36.
Wesarg
T
,
Richter
N
,
Hessel
H
,
Günther
S
,
Arndt
S
,
Aschendorff
A
,
Binaural integration of periodically alternating speech following cochlear implantation in subjects with profound sensorineural unilateral hearing loss
.
Audiol Neurotol
.
2015
;
20
(
Suppl 1
):
73
8
.
37.
Wie
OB
,
Pripp
AH
,
Tvete
O
.
Unilateral deafness in adults: effects on communication and social interaction
.
Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol
.
2010
;
119
:
772
81
.
38.
Zimmermann
N
.
Binaurales Sprachverstehen spektral seitengetrennter Sprache, bei einseitig ertaubten CI-Trägern, bilateralen CI-Trägern und Normalhörenden. Bachelor thesis, Jade University of Applied Sciences, Oldenburg
.
2013
.
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.