Introduction: The prevalence of hearing loss and its consequences is increasing as the elderly population grows. As the guidelines for cochlear implantation (CI) expand, the number of elderly CI recipients is also increasing. We report complication rates, survival duration, and audiological outcomes for CI recipients aged 80 years and over and discuss the cost utility of CI in this age group. Methods: A retrospective cohort study was undertaken of all CI recipients (126 cases), aged 80 years and over at the time of their surgery, implanted at our institution (Cambridge University Hospitals) during a period from January 1, 2001, to March 31, 2019. Data on survival at 1, 3, and 5 years post-implantation, post-operative complications and functional hearing outcomes including audiometric and speech discrimination outcomes (Bamford-Kowal-Bench sentence test) have been reported. Results: The mean age at implantation was 84 years. The mean audiometric score improved from 108 dB HL to 28 dB HL post-implantation. The mean Bamford-Kowal-Bench score improved from 14% to 66% and 73% at 2 and 12 months post-implantation, respectively. The complication rate was 15.3%. The survival probability at 1 year post-implantation was 0.95 for females and 0.93 for males, at 3 years was 0.89 for females and 0.81 for males, and at 5 years was 0.74 for females and 0.54 for males. Conclusion: CI is safe and well-tolerated in this age group and elderly patients gain similar audiometric and functional benefit as found for younger age groups.

1.
Alice
B
,
Silvia
M
,
Laura
G
,
Patrizia
T
,
Roberto
B
.
Cochlear implantation in the elderly: surgical and hearing outcomes
.
BMC Surg
.
2013
;
13
(
Suppl 2
):
S1
. .
2.
American Society of Anesthesiologists
.
American Society of Anesthesiologists [Internet]
;
2019
. Available from: https://www.asahq.org/standards-and-guidelines/asa-physical-status-classification-system.
3.
Bond
M
,
Mealing
S
,
Anderson
R
,
Elston
J
,
Weiner
G
,
Taylor
RS
,
The effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of cochlear implants for severe to profound deafness in children and adults: a systematic review and economic model
.
Health Technol Assess
.
2009
;
13
(
44
):
1
330
.
4.
Budenz
CL
,
Cosetti
MK
,
Coelho
DH
,
Birenbaum
B
,
Babb
J
,
Waltzman
SB
,
The effects of cochlear implantation on speech perception in older adults
.
J Am Geriatr Soc
.
2011
;
59
(
3
):
446
53
. .
5.
Cardillo
G
.
KMplot [Internet]
;
2020
[cited 2020 Jul 25]. Available from: https://github.com/dnafinder/kmplot.
6.
Carlson
ML
,
Breen
JT
,
Gifford
RH
,
Driscoll
CL
,
Neff
BA
,
Beatty
CW
,
Cochlear implantation in the octogenarian and nonagenarian
.
Otol Neurotol
.
2010
;
31
(
8
):
1343
9
. .
7.
Chatelin
V
,
Kim
EJ
,
Driscoll
C
,
Larky
J
,
Polite
C
,
Price
L
,
Cochlear implant outcomes in the elderly
.
Otol Neurotol
.
2004
;
25
(
3
):
298
301
. .
8.
Chen
DS
,
Clarrett
DM
,
Li
L
,
Bowditch
SP
,
Niparko
JK
,
Lin
FR
.
Cochlear implantation in older adults: long-term analysis of complications and device survival in a consecutive series
.
Otol Neurotol
.
2013
;
34
(
7
):
1272
7
. .
9.
Choi
JS
,
Betz
J
,
Li
L
,
Blake
CR
,
Sung
YK
,
Contrera
KJ
,
Association of using hearing aids or cochlear implants with changes in depressive symptoms in older adults
.
JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg
.
2016
;
142
(
7
):
652
. .
10.
Ciorba
A
,
Bianchini
C
,
Pelucchi
S
,
Pastore
A
.
The impact of hearing loss on the quality of life of elderly adults
.
Clin Interv Aging
.
2012
;
7
:
159
. .
11.
Clark
JH
,
Yeagle
J
,
Arbaje
AI
,
Lin
FR
,
Niparko
JK
,
Francis
HW
.
Cochlear implant rehabilitation in older adults: literature review and proposal of a conceptual framework
.
J Am Geriatr Soc
.
2012
;
60
(
10
):
1936
45
. .
12.
Cloutier
F
,
Bussières
R
,
Ferron
P
,
Côté
M
.
OCTO “Outcomes of cochlear implant for the octogenarians: audiologic and quality-of-life”
.
Otol Neurotol
.
2014
;
35
:
22
8
.
13.
Dillon
MT
,
Buss
E
,
Adunka
MC
,
King
ER
,
Pillsbury
HC
,
Adunka
OF
,
Long-term speech perception in elderly cochlear implant users
.
JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg
.
2013
;
139
(
3
):
279
. .
14.
Djalilian
HR
,
King
TA
,
Smith
SL
,
Levine
SC
.
Cochlear implantation in the elderly: results and quality-of-life assessment
.
Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol
.
2002
;
111
(
10
):
890
5
. .
15.
Fina
M
,
Skinner
M
,
Goebel
JA
,
Piccirillo
JF
,
Neely
JG
,
Black
O
.
Vestibular dysfunction after cochlear implantation
.
Otol Neurotol
.
2003
;
24
(
2
):
234
42
; discussion 242. .
16.
Goman
AM
,
Lin
FR
.
Prevalence of hearing loss by severity in the United States
.
Am J Public Health
.
2016
;
106
(
10
):
1820
2
. .
17.
Huarte
A
,
Lezaun
R
,
Manrique
M
.
Quality of life outcomes for cochlear implantation in the elderly
.
Audiol Neurotol
.
2014
;
19
(
1
):
36
9
. .
18.
Jolink
C
,
Helleman
HW
,
van Spronsen
E
,
Ebbens
FA
,
Ravesloot
MJ
,
Dreschler
WA
.
The long-term results of speech perception in elderly cochlear implant users
.
Cochlear Implants Int
.
2016
;
17
(
3
):
146
50
. .
19.
Kayser
C
,
Petkov
CI
,
Logothetis
NK
.
Visual modulation of neurons in auditory cortex
.
Cereb Cortex
.
2008
;
18
(
7
):
1560
74
. .
20.
Knopke
S
,
Gräbel
S
,
Förster-Ruhrmann
U
,
Mazurek
B
,
Szczepek
AJ
,
Olze
H
.
Impact of cochlear implantation on quality of life and mental comorbidity in patients aged 80 years
.
Laryngoscope
.
2016
;
126
(
12
):
2811
6
. .
21.
Lazard
DS
,
Vincent
C
,
Venail
F
,
Van de Heyning
P
,
Truy
E
,
Sterkers
O
,
Pre-, per- and postoperative factors affecting performance of postlinguistically deaf adults using cochlear implants: a new conceptual model over time
.
PLoS One
.
2012
;
7
(
11
):
e48739
. .
22.
Leung
J
,
Wang
NY
,
Yeagle
JD
,
Chinnici
J
,
Bowditch
S
,
Francis
HW
,
Predictive models for cochlear implantation in elderly candidates
.
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg
.
2005
;
131
(
12
):
1049
. .
23.
Li
CM
,
Zhang
X
,
Hoffman
HJ
,
Cotch
MF
,
Themann
CL
,
Wilson
MR
.
Hearing impairment associated with depression in US adults, National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2005–2010
.
JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg
.
2014
;
140
(
4
):
293
. .
24.
Lin
FR
,
Ferrucci
L
,
An
Y
,
Goh
JO
,
Doshi
J
,
Metter
EJ
,
Association of hearing impairment with brain volume changes in older adults
.
Neuroimage
.
2014
;
90
:
84
92
. .
25.
Lin
FR
,
Ferrucci
L
,
Metter
EJ
,
An
Y
,
Zonderman
AB
,
Resnick
SM
.
Hearing loss and cognition in the Baltimore Longitudinal Study of Aging
.
Neuropsychology
.
2011
;
25
(
6
):
763
70
. .
26.
Medina
MDM
,
Polo
R
,
Gutierrez
A
,
Muriel
A
,
Vaca
M
,
Perez
C
,
Cochlear implantation in postlingual adult patients with long-term auditory deprivation
.
Otol Neurotol
.
2017
;
38
(
8
):
e248
52
. .
27.
Mick
P
,
Kawachi
I
,
Lin
FR
.
The association between hearing loss and social isolation in older adults
.
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg
.
2014
;
150
(
3
):
378
84
. .
28.
Migirov
L
,
Taitelbaum-Swead
R
,
Drendel
M
,
Hildesheimer
M
,
Kronenberg
J
.
Cochlear implantation in elderly patients: surgical and audiological outcome
.
Gerontology
.
2010
;
56
(
2
):
123
8
. .
29.
Mosnier
I
,
Bebear
J-P
,
Marx
M
,
Fraysse
B
,
Truy
E
,
Lina-Granade
G
,
Predictive factors of cochlear implant outcomes in the elderly
.
Audiol Neurotol
.
2014
;
19
(
1
):
15
20
. .
30.
National Institute for Health and Care Excellence
.
Cochlear implants for children and adults with severe to profound deafness [Internet]
;
2019
. Available from: https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ta566.
31.
Office for National Statistics
.
National Population Projections: 2016-based statistical bulletin [Internet]
.
Office for National Statistics
;
2016
. Available from: https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/populationandmigration/populationprojections/bulletins/nationalpopulationprojections/2016basedstatisticalbulletin.
32.
Office for National Statistics
.
Past and projected period and cohort life tables, 2018-based, UK: 1981 to 2068 [Internet]
;
2020
. Available from: https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/birthsdeathsandmarriages/lifeexpectancies/bulletins/pastandprojecteddatafromtheperiodandcohortlifetables/1981to2068.
33.
Orabi
AA
,
Mawman
D
,
Al-Zoubi
F
,
Saeed
SR
,
Ramsden
RT
.
Cochlear implant outcomes and quality of life in the elderly: Manchester experience over 13 years
.
Clin Otolaryngol
.
2006
;
31
(
2
):
116
22
. .
34.
Rohloff
K
,
Koopmann
M
,
Wei
D
,
Rudack
C
,
Savvas
E
.
Cochlear implantation in the elderly: does age matter?
Otol Neurotol
.
2017
;
38
(
1
):
54
9
. .
35.
Roth
TN
,
Hanebuth
D
,
Probst
R
.
Prevalence of age-related hearing loss in Europe: a review
.
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol
.
2011
;
268
(
8
):
1101
7
. .
36.
Schierholz
I
,
Finke
M
,
Schulte
S
,
Hauthal
N
,
Kantzke
C
,
Rach
S
,
Enhanced audio-visual interactions in the auditory cortex of elderly cochlear-implant users
.
Hear Res
.
2015
;
328
:
133
47
. .
37.
Schumann
A
,
Hast
A
,
Hoppe
U
.
Speech performance and training effects in the cochlear implant elderly
.
Audiol Neurotol
.
2014
;
19
(
1
):
45
8
. .
38.
Sung
YK
,
Li
L
,
Blake
C
,
Betz
J
,
Lin
FR
.
Association of hearing loss and loneliness in older adults
.
J Aging Health
.
2016
;
28
(
6
):
979
94
. .
39.
Tsuchiya
A
.
QALYs and ageism: philosophical theories and age weighting
.
Health Econ
.
2000
;
9
(
1
):
57
68
. .
40.
Vermeire
K
,
Brokx
JP
,
Wuyts
FL
,
Cochet
E
,
Hofkens
A
,
Van de Heyning
PH
.
Quality-of-life benefit from cochlear implantation in the elderly
.
Otol Neurotol
.
2005
;
26
(
2
):
188
95
. .
41.
Völter
C
,
Götze
L
,
Dazert
S
,
Falkenstein
M
,
Thomas
JP
.
Can cochlear implantation improve neurocognition in the aging population?
Clin Interv Aging
.
2018
;
13
:
701
12
.
42.
Weinstein
BE
,
Ventry
IM
.
Hearing impairment and social isolation in the elderly
.
J Speech Hear Res
.
1982
;
25
(
4
):
593
9
. .
43.
Wong
DJY
,
Moran
M
,
O’Leary
SJ
.
Outcomes after cochlear implantation in the very elderly
.
Otol Neurotol
.
2016
;
37
(
1
):
46
51
. .
44.
Yang
Z
,
Cosetti
M
.
Safety and outcomes of cochlear implantation in the elderly: a review of recent literature
.
J Otol
.
2016
;
11
(
1
):
1
6
.
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.