Introduction: Bonebridge® is a novel active bone-anchored hearing implant. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the ease of implantation, the hearing performances, and the patient-reported benefit. Materials and Methods: This is a prospective cross-sectional study of 24 consecutive adult patients implanted for a mixed hearing loss (13 chronic otitis media (COM) and 11 other aetiologies). Twenty-one implants were placed in the retrosigmoid position and 3 in the mastoid. Audiometry, Abbreviated Profile of Hearing Aid Benefit (APHAB) questionnaire, as well as 5 implant-specific questions (analogue visual scale [AVS] 0–10 score), was administered. Results: Surgery lasted 73 ± 29.7 min on average. No major complication occurred. All patients were users at the last follow-up visit (median: 9-month range: 3–25). The average prosthetic gain was similar in COM and other aetiologies (43 ± 4.8 dB and 50 ± 7.2, respectively, not significant, Wilcoxon test). Bone-conduction thresholds were not deteriorated by surgery (Kruskal-Wallis test, not significant). APHAB scores improved in all categories except aversiveness (global score 45 ± 7.0% in COM and 32 ± 10.2% in others, not significant, and Wilcoxon test). Local pain (AVS: 3.23 ± 3.2, n = 16) and manipulation difficulties (3.1 ± 3.69) were low. The device was considered aesthetic (8.3 ± 2.49). Perfectible autonomy (5.0 ± 2.8) and difficulties wearing the implant during sport or at work (5.1 ± 3.47) were the weakest points. Conclusions: BoneBridge® implant provides reproducible results for the rehabilitation of mixed hearing losses and unilateral hearing loss.

1.
Baumgartner
WD
,
Hamzavi
JS
,
Böheim
K
,
Wolf-Magele
A
,
Schlögel
M
,
Riechelmann
H
,
A new transcutaneous bone conduction hearing implant: short-term safety and efficacy in children
.
Otol Neurotol
.
2016 Jul
;
37
(
6
):
713
20
. .
2.
Brånemark
PI
,
Adell
R
,
Albrektsson
T
,
Lekholm
U
,
Lundkvist
S
,
Rockler
B
.
Osseointegrated titanium fixtures in the treatment of edentulousness
.
Biomaterials
.
1983 Jan
;
4
(
1
):
25
8
. .
3.
Dimitriadis
PA
,
Farr
MR
,
Allam
A
,
Ray
J
.
Three-year experience with the cochlear BAHA attract implant: a systematic review of the literature
.
BMC Ear Nose Throat Disord
.
2016 Oct 1
;
16
:
12
.
4.
D’Eredità
R
,
Caroncini
M
,
Saetti
R
.
The new Baha implant: a prospective osseointegration study
.
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg
.
2012 Jun
;
146
(
6
):
979
83
..
5.
Håkansson
B
,
Tjellström
A
,
Rosenhall
U
,
Carlsson
P
.
The bone-anchored hearing aid. Principal design and a psychoacoustical evaluation
.
Acta Otolaryngol
.
1985 Sep-Oct
;
100
(
3–4
):
229
39
..
6.
Hobson
JC
,
Roper
AJ
,
Andrew
R
,
Rothera
MP
,
Hill
P
,
Green
KM
.
Complications of bone-anchored hearing aid implantation
.
J Laryngol Otol
.
2010 Feb
;
124
(
2
):
132
6
. .
7.
Kong
TH1
,
Park
YA1
,
Seo
YJ
.
Image-guided implantation of the Bonebridge™ with a surgical navigation: a feasibility study
.
Int J Surg Case Rep
.
2017
;
30
:
112
7
.
8.
McLarnon
CM
,
Davison
T
,
Johnson
IJ
.
Bone-anchored hearing aid: comparison of benefit by patient subgroups
.
Laryngoscope
.
2004 May
;
114
(
5
):
942
4
. .
9.
Medical Advisory Secretariat
.
Bone anchored hearing aid: an evidence-based analysis
.
Ont Health Technol Assess Ser
.
2002
;
2
(
3
):
1
47
..
10.
Riss
D
,
Arnoldner
C
,
Baumgartner
WD
,
Blineder
M
,
Flak
S
,
Bachner
A
,
Indication criteria and outcomes with the Bonebridge transcutaneous bone-conduction implant
.
Laryngoscope
.
2014 Dec
;
124
(
12
):
2802
6
. .
11.
Schmerber
S
,
Deguine
O
,
Marx
M
,
Van de Heyning
P
,
Sterkers
O
,
Mosnier
I
,
Safety and effectiveness of the Bonebridge transcutaneous active direct-drive bone-conduction hearing implant at 1-year device use
.
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol
.
2017 Apr
;
274
(
4
):
1835
51
. .
12.
Sprinzl
GM
,
Wolf-Magele
A
.
The bonebridge bone conduction hearing implant: indication criteria, surgery and a systematic review of the literature
.
Clin Otolaryngol
.
2016 Apr
;
41
(
2
):
131
43
. .
13.
Sprinzl
G
,
Lenarz
T
,
Ernst
A
,
Hagen
R
,
Wolf-Magele
A
,
Mojallal
H
,
First European multicenter results with a new transcutaneous bone conduction hearing implant system: short-term safety and efficacy
.
Otol Neurotol
.
2013 Aug
;
34
(
6
):
1076
83
. .
14.
Stenfelt
S
.
Transcranial attenuation of bone-conducted sound when stimulation is at the mastoid and at the bone conduction hearing aid position
.
Otol Neurotol
.
2012 Feb
;
33
(
2
):
105
14
. .
15.
Verstraeten
N
,
Zarowski
AJ
,
Somers
T
,
Riff
D
,
Offeciers
EF
.
Comparison of the audiologic results obtained with the bone-anchored hearing aid attached to the headband, the testband, and to the ‟snap” abutment
.
Otol Neurotol
.
2009 Jan
;
30
(
1
):
70
5
. .
16.
Vincent
C
,
Gagné
JP
,
Leroux
T
,
Clothier
A
,
Larivière
M
,
Dumont
FS
,
French-Canadian translation and validation of four questionnaires assessing hearing impairment and handicap
.
Int J Audiol
.
2017 Apr
;
56
(
4
):
248
59
. .
17.
Vyskocil
E
,
Riss
D
,
Arnoldner
C
,
Hamzavi
JS
,
Liepins
R
,
Kaider
A
,
Dura and sinus compression with a transcutaneous bone conduction device – hearing outcomes and safety in 38 patients
.
Clin Otolaryngol
.
2017 Oct
;
42
(
5
):
1033
8
. .
18.
Wimmer
W
,
Gerber
N
,
Guignard
J
,
Dubach
P
,
Kompis
M
,
Weber
S
,
Topographic bone thickness maps for bonebridge implantations
.
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol
.
2015 Jul
;
272
(
7
):
1651
8
. .
19.
Zawawi
F
,
Kabbach
G
,
Lallemand
M
,
Daniel
SJ
.
Bone-anchored hearing aid: why do some patients refuse it?
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol
.
2014 Feb
;
78
(
2
):
232
4
. .
20.
Zernotti
ME
,
Sarasty
AB
.
Active bone conduction prosthesis: bonebridgeTM
.
Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol
.
2015 Oct
;
19
(
4
):
343
8
.
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.