Objectives: The hearing process involves complex peripheral and central auditory pathways and could be influenced by various situations or medications. To date, there is very little known about the effects of alcohol on the auditory performances. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate how acute alcohol administration affects various aspects of hearing performance in human subjects, from the auditory perceptive threshold to the speech-in-noise task, which is cognitively demanding. Methods: A total of 43 healthy volunteers were recruited, and each of the participants received calculated amounts of alcohol according to their body weight and sex with a targeted blood alcohol content level of 0.05% using the Widmark formula. Hearing was tested in alcohol-free conditions (no alcohol intake within the previous 24 h) and acute alcohol conditions. A test battery composed of pure-tone audiometry, speech reception threshold (SRT), word recognition score (WRS), distortion product otoacoustic emission (DPOAE), gaps-in-noise (GIN) test, and Korean matrix sentence test (testing speech perception in noise) was performed in the 2 conditions. Results: Acute alcohol intake elevated pure-tone hearing thresholds and SRT but did not affect WRS. Both otoacoustic emissions recorded with DPOAE and the temporal resolution measured with the GIN test were not influenced by alcohol intake. The hearing performance in a noisy environment in both easy (−2 dB signal-to-noise ratio [SNR]) and difficult (−8 dB SNR) conditions was decreased by alcohol. Conclusions: Acute alcohol elevated auditory perceptive thresholds and affected performance in complex and difficult auditory tasks rather than simple tasks.

1.
Eckert
MA
,
Teubner-Rhodes
S
,
Vaden
KI
 Jr
.
Is listening in noise worth it? The neurobiology of speech recognition in challenging listening conditions
.
Ear Hear
.
2016 Jul–Aug
;
37
(
Suppl 1
):
101S
10S
. .
2.
Hickok
G
,
Poeppel
D
.
Dorsal and ventral streams: a framework for understanding aspects of the functional anatomy of language
.
Cognition
.
2004
;
92
:
67
99
.
3.
Hickok
G
,
Poeppel
D
.
The cortical organization of speech processing
.
Nat Rev Neurosci
.
2007
;
8
(
5
):
393
402
. .
4.
Hickok
G
,
Poeppel
D
.
Neural basis of speech perception
.
Handb Clin Neurol
.
2015
;
129
:
149
60
. .
5.
Hwang
JH
,
Li
CW
,
Wu
CW
,
Chen
JH
,
Liu
TC
.
Aging effects on the activation of the auditory cortex during binaural speech listening in white noise: an fMRI study
.
Audiol Neurootol
.
2007
;
12
(
5
):
285
94
. .
6.
Hwang
JH
,
Tan
CT
,
Chiang
CW
,
Liu
TC
.
Acute effects of alcohol on auditory thresholds and distortion product otoacoustic emissions in humans
.
Acta Otolaryngol
.
2003
;
123
(
8
):
936
40
. .
7.
Iliadou
V
,
Bamiou
D
,
Chermak
G
,
Nimatoudis
I
.
Comparison of two tests of auditory temporal resolution in children with central auditory processing disorder, adults with psychosis, and adult professional musicians
.
Int J Audiol
.
2014
;
53
(
8
):
507
13
. .
8.
Iliadou
V
,
Bamiou
D
,
Sidiras
C
,
Moschopoulos
N
,
Tsolaki
M
,
Nimatoudis
I
, et al
The use of the gaps-in-noise test as an index of the enhanced left temporal cortical thinning associated with the transition between mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer’s disease
.
J Am Acad Audiol
.
2017
;
28
(
5
):
463
71
. .
9.
Jääskeläinen
IP
,
Näätänen
R
,
Sillanaukee
P
.
Effect of acute ethanol on auditory and visual event-related potentials: a review and reinterpretation
.
Biol Psychiatry
.
1996a
;
40
(
4
):
284
91
.
10.
Jääskeläinen
IP
,
Pekkonen
E
,
Hirvonen
J
,
Sillanaukee
P
,
Näätänen
R
.
Mismatch negativity subcomponents and ethyl alcohol
.
Biol Psychol
.
1996b
;
43
(
1
):
13
25
. .
11.
Kähkönen
S
,
Wilenius
J
,
Nikulin
V
,
Ollikainen
M
,
Ilmoniemi
R
.
Alcohol reduces prefrontal cortical excitability in humans: a combined TMS and EEG study
.
Neuropsychopharmacology
.
2003
;
28
;
747
54
.
12.
Kemp
DT
.
Stimulated acoustic emissions from within the human auditory system
.
J Acoust Soc Am
.
1978
;
64
(
5
):
1386
91
. .
13.
Kiely
K
,
Gopinath
B
,
Mitchell
P
,
Luszcz
M
,
Anstey
K
.
Cognitive, health, and sociodemographic predictors of longitudinal decline in hearing acuity among older adults
.
J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci
.
2012
;
67
(
9
):
997
1003
. .
14.
Kim
KH
,
Lee
JH
.
Evaluation of the Korean matrix sentence test: verification of the list equivalence and the effect of word position
.
Audiol Speech Res
.
2018
;
14
(
2
):
100
7
. .
15.
LeDoux
JE
.
Brain mechanisms of emotion and emotional learning
.
Curr Opin Neurobiol
.
1992
;
2
(
2
):
191
7
. .
16.
Loquet
G
,
Campo
P
,
Lataye
R
,
Cossec
B
,
Bonnet
P
.
Combined effects of exposure to styrene and ethanol on the auditory function in the rat
.
Hear Res
.
2000 Oct
;
148
(
1–2
):
173
80
. .
17.
Musiek
FE
,
Shinn
JB
,
Jirsa
R
,
Bamiou
DE
,
Baran
JA
,
Zaida
E
.
GIN (Gaps-in-Noise) test performance in subjects with confirmed central auditory nervous system involvement
.
Ear Hear
.
2005
;
26
(
6
):
608
18
. .
18.
Mazziotta
JC
,
Phelps
ME
,
Carson
RE
,
Kuhl
DE
.
Tomographic mapping of human cerebral metabolism: auditory stimulation
.
Neurology
.
1982
;
32
(
9
):
921
37
. .
19.
Murata
K
,
Kawashima
M
,
Inaba
R
.
Auditory threshold reduction on alcohol ingestion
.
Psychopharmacology
.
2001
;
157
(
2
):
188
92
. .
20.
Pearson
P
,
Dawe
LA
,
Timney
B
.
Frequency selective effects of alcohol on auditory detection and frequency discrimination thresholds
.
Alcohol Alcohol
.
1999
;
34
(
5
):
741
9
. .
21.
Popelka
MM
,
Cruickshanks
KJ
,
Wiley
TL
,
Tweed
TS
,
Klein
BE
,
Klein
R
, et al
Moderate alcohol consumption and hearing loss: a protective effect
.
J Am Geriatr Soc
.
2000
;
48
(
10
):
1273
8
. .
22.
Porjesz
B
,
Begleiter
H
.
Brain dysfunction and alcohol
. In:
Kissin
B
,
Begleiter
H
, editors.
The pathogenesis of alcoholism
.
New York
:
Plenum
;
1983
. p.
415
83
.
23.
Price
C
.
The anatomy of language: a review of 100 fMRI studies published in 2009
.
Ann N Y Acad Sci
.
2010
;
1191
(
1
):
62
88
. .
24.
Price
C
.
A review and synthesis of the first 20 years of PET and fMRI studies of heard speech, spoken language and reading
.
Neuroimage
.
2012
;
62
(
2
):
816
47
. .
25.
Syka
J
,
Rybalko
N
,
Mazelová
J
,
Druga
R
.
Gap detection threshold in the rat before and after auditory cortex ablation
.
Hear Res
.
2002
;
172
(
1–2
):
151
9
. .
26.
Upile
T
,
Sipaul
F
,
Jerjes
W
,
Singh
S
,
Nouraei
SA
,
El Maaytah
M
, et al
The acute effects of alcohol on auditory thresholds
.
BMC Ear Nose Throat Disord
.
2007Sep 18
;
7
:
4
. .
27.
Vaden
KI
 Jr
,
Teubner-Rhodes
S
,
Ahlstrom
JB
,
Dubno
JR
,
Eckert
MA
.
Cingulo-opercular activity affects incidental memory encoding for speech in noise
.
Neuroimage
.
2017Aug 15
;
157
:
381
7
. .
28.
Zatorre
RJ
,
Evans
AC
,
Meyer
E
,
Gjedde
A
.
Lateralization of phonetic and pitch discrimination in speech processing
.
Science
.
1992
;
256
(
5058
):
846
9
. .
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.