Introduction: Auditory brainstem response (ABR) is one of the commonly used methods in clinical settings to evaluate the hearing sensitivity and auditory function. The current ABR measurement usually adopts click sound as the stimuli. However, there may be partial ABR amplitude attenuation due to the delay characteristics of the cochlear traveling wave along the basilar membrane. To solve that problem, a swept-tone method was proposed, in which the show-up time of different frequency components was adjusted to compensate the delay characteristics of the cochlear basilar membrane; therefore, different ABR subcomponents of different frequencies were synchronized. Methods: The normal hearing group, moderate sensorineural hearing loss group, and severe sensorineural hearing loss group underwent click ABR and swept-tone ABR with different stimulus intensities. The latencies and amplitudes of waves I, III, and V in 2 detections were recorded. Results: It was found that the latency of each of the recorded I, III, and V waves detected by swept-tone ABR was shorter than that by click ABR in both the control group and experimental groups. In addition, the amplitude of each of the recorded I, III, and V waves, except V waves under 60 dB nHL in the moderate sensorineural hearing loss group, detected by swept-tone ABR was larger than that by click ABR. The results also showed that the swept-tone ABR could measure the visible V waves at lower stimulus levels in the severe sensorineural hearing loss group. Conclusion: Swept-tone improves the ABR waveforms and helps to obtain more accurate threshold to some extent. Therefore, the proposed swept-tone ABR may provide a new solution for better morphology of ABR waveform, which can help to make more accurate diagnosis about the hearing functionality in the clinic.

1.
Chen
S
,
Deng
J
,
Bian
L
,
Li
G
.
Stimulus frequency otoacoustic emissions evoked by swept tones
.
Hear Res
.
2013 Dec
;
306
:
104
14
.
2.
Deng
J
,
Chen
S
,
Zeng
X
,
Li
G
.
Using a dynamic tracking filter to extract distortion-product otoacoustic emissions evoked with swept-tone signals
.
IEEE J Biomed Health Inform
.
2014 July
;
18
:
1186
95
.
3.
Elberling
C
,
Don
M
,
Kristensen
SGB
.
Auditory brainstem responses to chirps delivered by an insert earphone with equalized frequency response
.
J Acoust Soc Am
.
2012
;
132
:
EL149
54
.
4.
Escera
C
,
Althen
H
,
Grimm
S
.
Auditory evoked brainstem responses
.
New York
:
Springer
;
2013
. p.
1
3
.
5.
Gardner-Berry
K
,
Chang
H
,
Ching
TY
,
Hou
S
.
Detection rates of cortical auditory evoked potentials at different sensation levels in infants with sensory/neural hearing loss and auditory neuropathy spectrum disorder
.
Semin Hear
.
2016 Feb
;
37
(
1
):
53
61
.
6.
Guastini
L
,
Mora
R
,
Dellepiane
M
,
Santomauro
V
,
Mora
M
,
Rocca
A
, et al.
Evaluation of an automated auditory brainstem response in a multi-stage infant hearing screening
.
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol
.
2010 Aug
;
267
(
8
):
1199
205
.
7.
Lewis
JD
,
Kopun
J
,
Neely
ST
,
Schmid
KK
,
Gorga
MP
.
Tone-burst auditory brainstem response wave V latencies in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired ears
.
J Acoust Soc Am
.
2015 Nov
;
138
(
5
):
3210
9
.
8.
McCandless
DW
.
Auditory brainstem response
.
New Jersey
:
Humana Press
;
2011
. p.
175
87
.
9.
Mourtzouchos
K
,
Riga
M
,
Cebulla
M
,
Danielides
V
,
Naxakis
S
.
Comparison of click auditory brainstem response and chirp auditory steady-state response thresholds in children
.
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol
.
2018 Sep
;
112
:
91
6
.
10.
Negin Salehi
FB
,
Hamid Ramezani
F
.
Effects of hyperbilirubinemia on auditory brainstem response of neonates treated with phototherapy
.
Iran J Otorhinolaryngol
.
2016
;
28
(
1
):
23
9
.
11.
Strelcyk
O
,
Christoforidis
D
,
Dau
T
.
Relation between derived-band auditory brainstem response latencies and behavioral
.
J Acoust Soc Am
.
2009
;
126
(
4
):
1878
88
.
12.
Schwartz
MS
,
Wilkinson
EP
,
Lekovic
GP
,
Shannon
RV
.
Factors affecting auditory brainstem implant performance in patients with neurofibromatosis type 2
.
Brain Stimul
.
2015
;
8
(
2
):
364
.
13.
Sisneros
JA
,
Popper
AN
,
Hawkins
AD
,
Fay
RR
.
Auditory evoked potential audiograms compared with behavioral audiograms in aquatic animals
.
Adv Exp Med Biol
.
2016
;
875
:
1049
56
.
14.
Skoe
E
,
Kraus
N
.
Auditory brain stem response to complex sounds: a tutorial
.
Ear Hearing
.
2010 Jun
;
31
(
3
):
302
24
.
15.
Smit
AL
,
Been
JV
,
Zimmermann
LJ
,
Kornelisse
RF
,
Andriessen
P
,
Vanterpool
SF
, et al.
Automated auditory brainstem response in preterm newborns with histological chorioamnionitis
.
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med
.
2015
;
28
(
15
):
1864
9
.
16.
Spitzer
E
,
White-Schwoch
T
,
Carr
KW
,
Skoe
E
,
Kraus
N
.
Continued maturation of the click-evoked auditory brainstem response in preschoolers
.
J Am Acad Audiol
.
2015 Jan
;
26
(
1
):
30
5
.
17.
Stapells
DR
,
Herdman
A
,
A
Small S
,
Dimitrijevic
A
,
Hatton
J
.
Current status of the auditory steady-state responses for estimating an infant’s audiogram
.
J Audiol Speech Pathol
.
2008
;
16
:
2
15
.
18.
Zaitoun
M
,
Cumming
S
,
Purcell
A
,
O’brien
K
.
Inter and intra-reader variability in the threshold estimation of auditory brainstem response (ABR) results
.
Hearing Balance Commun
.
2015
;
14
(
1
):
59
63
.
19.
Zhang
F
,
Chen
S
,
Zhang
H
,
Zhang
X
,
Li
G
.
Bioelectric signal detrending using smoothness prior approach
.
Med Eng Phys
.
2014 Aug
;
36
(
8
):
1007
13
.
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.