The auditory brainstem response (ABR) is a commonly used objective clinical measure for hearing evaluation. It can be also used to draw conclusions about the functioning of distinct stages of the auditory pathway including the binaural processing stages using the binaural interaction component (BIC) of the ABR. Objective: To study binaural processing in normal hearing subjects complaining of tinnitus. Methods: Sixty cases with bilateral normal peripheral hearing were included in this work, divided into 2 groups, i.e., group 1 (comprised of 30 healthy subjects representing the control group) and group 2 (comprised of 30 subjects with tinnitus representing the study group). All of the subjects were submitted to a basic audiological evaluation (including pure tone audiometry, speech audiometry, and immittancemetry) and ABR audiometry recorded in monaural and then binaural conditions. Results: In monaural recording, the tinnitus group showed significantly delayed latencies of waves I, III, and V in addition to significantly reduced wave I and III amplitudes when compared with the controls. Similar significant findings were found when binaural ABR responses were compared between both groups. Comparing BIC between both groups showed significant earlier BIC for latencies of waves I and V in the control group, while the BIC for amplitudes showed similar results in both groups. Conclusions: These finding suggest the presence of binaural processing deficits in tinnitus patients at different levels along the ascending auditory pathway.

1.
Auerbach
BD
,
Rodrigues
PV
,
Salvi
R
(
2014
).
Central gain control in tinnitus and hyperacusis.
Front. Neurol. 24;5:206.
2.
Barnea
G
,
Attias
J
,
Gold
S
,
Shahar
A
.
Tinnitus with normal hearing sensitivity: extended high-frequency audiometry and auditory-nerve brain-stem-evoked responses
.
Audiology
.
1990
;
29
(
1
):
36
45
.
[PubMed]
0020-6091
3.
Boettcher
FA
.
Presbyacusis and the auditory brainstem response
.
J Speech Lang Hear Res
.
2002
Dec
;
45
(
6
):
1249
61
.
[PubMed]
1092-4388
4.
Cassvan
A
,
Ralescu
S
,
Moshkovski
FG
,
Shapiro
E
.
Brainstem auditory evoked potential studies in patients with tinnitus and/or vertigo
.
Arch Phys Med Rehabil
.
1990
Jul
;
71
(
8
):
583
6
.
[PubMed]
0003-9993
5.
Chen
YC
,
Zhang
J
,
Li
XW
,
Xia
W
,
Feng
X
,
Gao
B
, et al.
Aberrant spontaneous brain activity in chronic tinnitus patients revealed by resting-state functional MRI
.
Neuroimage Clin
.
2014
Sep
;
6
:
222
8
.
[PubMed]
2213-1582
6.
Dobie
RA
,
Berlin
CI
.
Binaural interaction in brainstem-evoked responses
.
Arch Otolaryngol
.
1979
Jul
;
105
(
7
):
391
8
.
[PubMed]
0003-9977
7.
Dobie
RA
,
Norton
SJ
.
Binaural interaction in human auditory evoked potentials
.
Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol
.
1980
Aug
;
49
(
3-4
):
303
13
.
[PubMed]
0013-4694
8.
Ferber
AT
,
Benichoux
V
,
Tollin
DJ
.
Test-Retest Reliability of the Binaural Interaction Component of the Auditory Brainstem Response
.
Ear Hear
.
2016
Sep-Oct
;
37
(
5
):
e291
301
.
[PubMed]
0196-0202
9.
Gilles
A
,
Schlee
W
,
Rabau
S
,
Wouters
K
,
Fransen
E
,
Van de Heyning
P
.
Decreased speech-in-noise understanding in young adults with tinnitus
.
Front Neurosci
.
2016
Jun
;
10
:
288
.
[PubMed]
1662-4548
10.
Griffiths
TD
.
Central auditory processing disorders
.
Curr Opin Neurol
.
2002
Feb
;
15
(
1
):
31
3
.
[PubMed]
1350-7540
11.
Gu
JW
,
Herrmann
BS
,
Levine
RA
,
Melcher
JR
.
Brainstem auditory evoked potentials suggest a role for the ventral cochlear nucleus in tinnitus
.
J Assoc Res Otolaryngol
.
2012
Dec
;
13
(
6
):
819
33
.
[PubMed]
1525-3961
12.
Henry
JA
,
Roberts
LE
,
Caspary
DM
,
Theodoroff
SM
,
Salvi
RJ
.
Underlying mechanisms of tinnitus: review and clinical implications
.
J Am Acad Audiol
.
2014
Jan
;
25
(
1
):
5
22
.
[PubMed]
1050-0545
13.
Hofmeier
B
,
Wolpert
S
,
Aldamer
ES
,
Walter
M
,
Thiericke
J
,
Braun
C
, et al.
Reduced sound-evoked and resting-state BOLD fMRI connectivity in tinnitus
.
Neuroimage Clin
.
2018
Aug
;
20
:
637
49
.
[PubMed]
2213-1582
14.
Hyvärinen
P
,
Mäkitie
A
,
Aarnisalo
AA
(
2016
). Self administered Domiciliary tDCS Treatment for Tinnitus:A Double-Blind Sham-Controlled Study .PLoS One. 28;11(4):e0154286.
15.
Jain
C
,
Sahoo
JP
.
The effect of tinnitus on some psychoacoustical abilities in individuals with normal hearing sensitivity
.
Int Tinnitus J
.
2014
;
19
(
1
):
28
35
.
[PubMed]
0946-5448
16.
Jastreboff
PJ
.
Phantom auditory perception (tinnitus): mechanisms of generation and perception
.
Neurosci Res
.
1990
Aug
;
8
(
4
):
221
54
.
[PubMed]
0168-0102
17.
Kamal
N
,
Tawfic
S
,
Ahmed
S
(
1995
).
Evaluation of tinnitus.
Egypt J 339 Otolaryngol12(92):211–225.
18.
Kehrle
HM
,
Granjeiro
RC
,
Sampaio
AL
,
Bezerra
R
,
Almeida
VF
,
Oliveira
CA
.
Comparison of auditory brainstem response results in normal-hearing patients with and without tinnitus
.
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg
.
2008
Jun
;
134
(
6
):
647
51
.
[PubMed]
0886-4470
19.
Kujawa
SG
,
Fallon
M
,
Bobbin
RP
.
Time-varying alterations in the f2-f1 DPOAE response to continuous primary stimulation. I: response characterization and contribution of the olivocochlear efferents
.
Hear Res
.
1995
May
;
85
(
1-2
):
142
54
.
[PubMed]
0378-5955
20.
Lalaki
P
,
Hatzopoulos
S
,
Lorito
G
,
Kochanek
K
,
Sliwa
L
,
Skarzynski
H
.
A connection between the Efferent Auditory System and Noise-Induced Tinnitus Generation. Reduced contralateral suppression of TEOAEs in patients with noise-induced tinnitus
.
Med Sci Monit
.
2011
Jul
;
17
(
7
):
MT56
62
.
[PubMed]
1234-1010
21.
Laumen
G
,
Ferber
AT
,
Klump
GM
,
Tollin
DJ
.
The Physiological Basis and Clinical Use of the Binaural Interaction Component of the Auditory Brainstem Response
.
Ear Hear
.
2016
Sep-Oct
;
37
(
5
):
e276
90
.
[PubMed]
0196-0202
22.
Lemaire
MC
,
Beutter
P
.
Brainstem auditory evoked responses in patients with tinnitus
.
Audiology
.
1995
Nov-Dec
;
34
(
6
):
287
300
.
[PubMed]
0020-6091
23.
Longenecker
RJ
,
Galazyuk
AV
.
Development of tinnitus in CBA/CaJ mice following sound exposure
.
J Assoc Res Otolaryngol
.
2011
Oct
;
12
(
5
):
647
58
.
[PubMed]
1525-3961
24.
Malmierca
MS
,
Hackett
A
. Structural organization of the ascending auditory pathway. In:
Rees
A
,
Palmer
AR
, editors
.
The Oxford Handbook of Auditory Science: The Auditory Brain
.
Oxford, UK
:
Oxford University Press
;
2010
. pp.
9
41
.
25.
Manzoor
NF
,
Licari
FG
,
Klapchar
M
,
Elkin
RL
,
Gao
Y
,
Chen
G
, et al.
Noise-induced hyperactivity in the inferior colliculus: its relationship with hyperactivity in the dorsal cochlear nucleus
.
J Neurophysiol
.
2012
Aug
;
108
(
4
):
976
88
.
[PubMed]
0022-3077
26.
McKee
GJ
,
Stephens
SD
.
An investigation of normally hearing subjects with tinnitus
.
Audiology
.
1992
;
31
(
6
):
313
7
.
[PubMed]
0020-6091
27.
Melcher
JR
,
Kiang
NY
.
Generators of the brainstem auditory evoked potential in cat. III: identified cell populations
.
Hear Res
.
1996
Apr
;
93
(
1-2
):
52
71
.
[PubMed]
0378-5955
28.
Middlebrooks
JC
,
Green
DM
.
Sound localization by human listeners
.
Annu Rev Psychol
.
1991
;
42
(
1
):
135
59
.
[PubMed]
0066-4308
29.
Milloy
V
,
Fournier
P
,
Benoit
D
,
Noreña
A
, Korav and A.
Auditory Brainstem Responses in Tinnitus: A Review of Who, How, and What? Front Aging Neurosci. 2017;9:237
.
Published
.
2017
;
2017
(
Jul
):
21
.
[PubMed]
30.
Møller
AR
.
Auditory neurophysiology
.
J Clin Neurophysiol
.
1994
May
;
11
(
3
):
284
308
.
[PubMed]
0736-0258
31.
Møller
AR
. Pathology of the auditory system that can cause tinnitus. In:
Møller
AR
,
Langguth
B
,
DeRidder
D
,
Kleinjung
T
, editors
.
Textbook of Tinnitus
.
New York
:
Springer
;
2011
. pp.
77
93
.
32.
Møller
AR
,
Jannetta
PJ
,
Sekhar
LN
.
Contributions from the auditory nerve to the brain-stem auditory evoked potentials (BAEPs): results of intracranial recording in man
.
Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol
.
1988
May-Jun
;
71
(
3
):
198
211
.
[PubMed]
0013-4694
33.
Pickles
JO
.
An Introduction to the Physiology of Hearing
. 2nd ed.
New York
:
Academic
;
1988
.
34.
Robertson
D
,
Bester
C
,
Vogler
D
,
Mulders
WH
.
Spontaneous hyperactivity in the auditory midbrain: relationship to afferent input
.
Hear Res
.
2013
Jan
;
295
:
124
9
.
[PubMed]
0378-5955
35.
Robertson
D
,
Mulders
WH
. The inferior colliculus: involvement in hyperactivity and tinnitus. In:
Eggermont
JJ
,
Zeng
FG
,
Popper
AN
,
Fay
RN
, editors
.
Tinnitus
.
New York
:
Springer
;
2012
. pp.
121
35
.
36.
Rosenhall
U
,
Axelsson
A
.
Auditory brainstem response latencies in patients with tinnitus
.
Scand Audiol
.
1995
;
24
(
2
):
97
100
.
[PubMed]
0105-0397
37.
Rüttiger
L
,
Singer
W
,
Panford-Walsh
R
,
Matsumoto
M
,
Lee
SC
,
Zuccotti
A
, et al.
The reduced cochlear output and the failure to adapt the central auditory response causes tinnitus in noise exposed rats
.
PLoS One
.
2013
;
8
(
3
):
e57247
.
[PubMed]
1932-6203
38.
Salvi
RJ
,
Hamernik
RP
,
Henderson
D
.
Discharge patterns in the cochlear nucleus of the chinchilla following noise induced asymptotic threshold shift
.
Exp Brain Res
.
1978
Jul
;
32
(
3
):
301
20
.
[PubMed]
0014-4819
39.
Sedley
W
,
Alter
K
,
Gander
PE
,
Berger
J
,
Griffiths
TD
(
2019
). Exposing Pathological Sensory Predictions in Tinnitus Using Auditory Intensity Deviant Evoked Responses. J Neurosci. 11;39(50):10096-10103
40.
Sedley
W
,
Friston
KJ
,
Gander
PE
,
Kumar
S
,
Griffiths
TD
.
An integrative tinnitus model based on sensory precision
.
Trends Neurosci
.
2016
Dec
;
39
(
12
):
799
812
.
[PubMed]
0166-2236
41.
Shore
SE
,
Roberts
LE
,
Langguth
B
.
Maladaptive plasticity in tinnitus—triggers, mechanisms and treatment
.
Nat Rev Neurol
.
2016
Mar
;
12
(
3
):
150
60
.
[PubMed]
1759-4758
42.
Shulman
A
,
Seitz
MR
.
Central tinnitus—diagnosis and treatment. Observations simultaneous binaural auditory brain responses with monaural stimulation in the tinnitus patient
.
Laryngoscope
.
1981
Dec
;
91
(
12
):
2025
35
.
[PubMed]
0023-852X
43.
Spivak
LG
,
Seitz
MR
.
Response asymmetry and binaural interaction in the auditory brain stem evoked response
.
Ear Hear
.
1988
Apr
;
9
(
2
):
57
64
.
[PubMed]
0196-0202
44.
Stollman
MH
,
Snik
AF
,
Hombergen
GC
,
Nieuwenhuys
R
,
ten Koppel
P
.
Detection of the binaural interaction component in the auditory brainstem response
.
Br J Audiol
.
1996
Jun
;
30
(
3
):
227
32
.
[PubMed]
0300-5364
45.
Tait
C
,
Miller
J
,
Cycowicz
Y
,
Sohmer
H
.
Experimental analyses of the source of ABR wave II
.
Arch Otorhinolaryngol
.
1987
;
244
(
1
):
26
9
.
[PubMed]
0302-9530
46.
Uppunda
AK
,
Bhat
J
,
D’costa
PE
,
Raj
M
,
Kumar
K
.
Binaural Interaction Component in Speech Evoked Auditory Brainstem Responses
.
J Int Adv Otol
.
2015
Aug
;
11
(
2
):
114
7
.
[PubMed]
1308-7649
47.
Vogler
DP
,
Robertson
D
,
Mulders
WH
.
Hyperactivity in the ventral cochlear nucleus after cochlear trauma
.
J Neurosci
.
2011
May
;
31
(
18
):
6639
45
.
[PubMed]
0270-6474
48.
Weisz
N
,
Müller
S
,
Schlee
W
,
Dohrmann
K
,
Hartmann
T
,
Elbert
T
.
The neural code of auditory phantom perception
.
J Neurosci
.
2007
Feb
;
27
(
6
):
1479
84
.
[PubMed]
0270-6474
49.
Yang
S
,
Bao
S
.
Homeostatic mechanisms and treatment of tinnitus
.
Restor Neurol Neurosci
.
2013
;
31
(
2
):
99
108
.
[PubMed]
0922-6028
50.
Zeng
FG
,
Tang
Q
,
Dimitrijevic
A
,
Starr
A
,
Larky
J
,
Blevins
NH
.
Tinnitus suppression by low-rate electric stimulation and its electrophysiological mechanisms
.
Hear Res
.
2011
Jul
;
277
(
1-2
):
61
6
.
[PubMed]
0378-5955
51.
Zhang
J
.
Auditory cortex stimulation to suppress tinnitus: mechanisms and strategies
.
Hear Res
.
2013
Jan
;
295
:
38
57
.
[PubMed]
0378-5955
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.