Objectives: To review evidence regarding the health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and cost-effectiveness of unilateral and bilateral cochlear implantation (CI) among children and adults with severe-to-profound hearing loss. Study Design: Narrative review. Methods: Publications related to quality of life (QoL) and costs of care in CI were acquired through searches in English-language databases. Studies were included if they had identified the HRQoL attainment, cost of care, cost-utility, or cost-effectiveness associated with CI. Results: 57 studies were critically reviewed. The QoL outcome metrics used in these articles were divided into 2 categories - generic and condition specific. In studies investigating children, many reported no significant difference in QoL attainment between CI recipients and normal-hearing peers. In adults, significant improvements in QoL after implantation and higher QoL than in their nonimplanted (hearing-aided) peers were frequently reported. Studies involving an older adult cohort reported significant improvement in QoL after implantation, which was often independent of audiological performance. Overall, the calculated cost-utility ratios consistently met the threshold of cost acceptance, indicating acceptable values for expenditures on CI. Conclusions: Considerable work has been done on the QoL attainment and health economic implications of CI. Unilateral CI across all age groups leads to reported sustained benefits in the recipients' overall and disease-specific QoL. With increased cost associated with bilateral CI, further study is needed to characterize its costs and benefits with respect to the recipients' health, well-being, and contributions to society.

1.
Barton GR, Bloor KE, Marshall DH, Summerfield AQ: Health-service costs of pediatric cochlear implantation: multi-center analysis. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 2003;672:141-149.
2.
Barton GR, Stacey PC, Fortnum HM, Summerfield AQ: Hearing-impaired children in the United Kingdom, II: cochlear implantation and the cost of compulsory education. Ear Hear 2006a;27:187-207.
3.
Barton GR, Fortnum HM, Stacey PC, Summerfield AQ: Hearing-impaired children in the United Kingdom, III: cochlear implantation and the economic costs incurred by families. Ear Hear 2006b;27:563-574.
4.
Barton GR, Stacey PC, Fortnum HM, Summerfield AQ: Hearing-impaired children in the United Kingdom, IV: cost-effectiveness of pediatric cochlear implantation. Ear Hear 2006c;27:575-588.
5.
Bichey BG, Miyamoto RT: Outcomes in bilateral cochlear implantation. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2008;138:655-661.
6.
Bond M, Mealing S, Anderson R, et al: The effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of cochlear implants for severe to profound deafness in children and adults: a systematic review and economic model. Health Technol Assess 2009;13:1-330.
7.
Buhagiar R, Lutman M: Quality of life measures for patients with bilateral cochlear implants. Cochlear Implants Int 2010;11(Suppl 1):264-267.
8.
Chen JM, Amoodi H, Mittmann N: Cost-utility analysis of bilateral cochlear implantation in adults: a health economic assessment from the perspective of a publicly funded program. Laryngoscope 2014;124:1452-1458.
9.
Cheng AK, Rubin HR, Powe NR, Mellon NK, Francis HW, Niparko JK: Cost-utility analysis of the cochlear implant in children. JAMA 2000;284:850-856.
10.
Chung J, Chueng K, Shipp D, Friesen L, Chen JM, Nedzelski JM, Lin VY: Unilateral multi-channel cochlear implantation results in significant improvement in quality of life. Otol Neurotol 2012;33:566-571.
11.
Clark JH, Wang NY, Riley AW, Carson CM, Meserole RL, Lin FR, Eisenberg LS, Tobey EA, Quittner AL, Francis HW, Team CDI, Niparko JK: Timing of cochlear implantation and parents' global ratings of children's health and development. Otol Neurotol 2012;33:545-552.
12.
Cohen SM, Labadie RF, Dietrich MS, Haynes DS: Quality of life in hearing-impaired adults: the role of cochlear implants and hearing aids. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2004;131:413-422.
13.
Damen GW, Beynon AJ, Krabbe PF, Mulder JJ, Mylanus EA: Cochlear implantation and quality of life in postlingually deaf adults: long-term follow-up. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2007;136:597-604.
14.
Di Nardo W, Anzivino R, Giannantonio S, Schinaia L, Paludetti G: The effects of cochlear implantation on quality of life in the elderly. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2014;271:65-73.
15.
Edwards L, Hill T, Mahon M: Quality of life in children and adolescents with cochlear implants and additional needs. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 2012;76:851-857.
16.
Emmett SD, Francis HW: Bilateral hearing loss is associated with decreased nonverbal intelligence in US children aged 6-16 years. Laryngoscope 2014;124:2176-2181.
17.
Emmett SD, Francis HW: The socioeconomic impact of hearing loss in US adults. Otol Neurotol 2015;36:545-550.
18.
Emmett SD, Tucci DL, Smith M, Macharia IM, Ndegwa SN, Nakku D, Mukara KB, Ibekwe TS, Mulwafu W, Gong W, Francis HW, Saunders JE: GDP matters: cost effectiveness of cochlear implantation and deaf education in sub-Saharan Africa. Otol Neurotol 2015;36:1357-1365.
19.
Faber CE, Grøntved AM: Cochlear implantation and change in quality of life. Acta Otolaryngol 2000;120:151-153.
20.
Fortunato-Tavares T, Befi-Lopes D, Bento RF, De Andrade CRF: Children with cochlear implants: communication skills and quality of life. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol 2012;78:15-25.
21.
Foteff C, Kennedy S, Milton AH, Deger M, Payk F, Sanderson G: Cost-utility analysis of cochlear implantation in Australian adults. Otol Neurotol 2016;37:454-461.
22.
Francis HW, Koch ME, Wyatt JR, Niparko JK: Trends in educational placement and cost-benefit considerations in children with cochlear implants. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1999;125:499-505.
23.
Francis HW, Chee N, Yeagle J, Cheng A, Niparko JK: Impact of cochlear implants on the functional health status of older adults. Laryngoscope 2002;112(8 Pt 1):1482-1488.
24.
Froberg DG, Kane RL: Methodology for measuring health-state preferences. II. Scaling methods. J Clin Epidemiol 1989;42:459-471.
25.
Fuller C, Mallinckrodt L, Maat B, Baskent D, Free R: Music and quality of life in early-deafened late-implanted adult cochlear implant users. Otol Neurotol 2013;34:1041-1047.
26.
Gusi N, Olivares PR, Rajendram R: The EQ-5D Health-Related Quality of Life Questionnaire; in Preedy VR, Watson RR (eds): Handbook of Disease Burdens and Quality of Life Measures. New York, Springer, 2010.
27.
Harris JP, Anderson JP: An outcomes study of cochlear implants in deaf patients. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1999;121:675-676.
28.
Hawthorne G, Hogan A, Giles E, Stewart M, Kethel L, White K, Plaith B, Pedley K, Rushbrooke E, Taylor A: Evaluating the health- related quality of life effects of cochlear implants: a prospective study of an adult cochlear implant program. Int J Audiol 2004;43:183-192.
29.
Hinderink JB, Krabbe PF, Van Den Broek P: Development and application of a health-related quality-of-life instrument for adults with cochlear implants: the Nijmegen Cochlear Implant Questionnaire. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2000;123:756-765.
30.
Huber M: Health-related quality of life of Austrian children and adolescents with cochlear implants. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 2005;69:1089-1101.
31.
Huttunen K, Rimmanen S, Vikman S, Virokannas N, Sorri M, Archbold S, Lutman ME: Parents' views on the quality of life of their children 2-3 years after cochlear implantation. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 2009;73:1786-1794.
32.
Klop WM, Boermans PP, Ferrier MB, Van Den Hout WB, Stiggelbout AM, Frijns JH: Clinical relevance of quality of life outcome in cochlear implantation in postlingually deafened adults. Otol Neurotol 2008;29:615-621.
33.
Klop WM, Briaire JJ, Stiggelbout AM, Frijns JH: Cochlear implant outcomes and quality of life in adults with prelingual deafness. Laryngoscope 2007;117:1982-1987.
34.
Kobau R, Sniezek J, Zack MM, Lucas RE, Burns A: Well-being assessment: an evaluation of well-being scales for public health and population estimates of well-being among US adults. Appl Psychol Health Well-Being 2010;2:272-297.
35.
Koch ME, Wyatt JR, Francis HW, Niparko JK: A model of educational resource use by children with cochlear implants. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1997;117(3 Pt 1):174-179.
36.
Kral A, O'Donoghue GM: Profound deafness in childhood. N Engl J Med 2010;363:1438-1450.
37.
Kuthubutheen J, Mittmann N, Amoodi H, Qian W, Chen JM: The effect of different utility measures on the cost-effectiveness of bilateral cochlear implantation. Laryngoscope 2015;125:442-447.
38.
Lassaletta L, Castro A, Bastarrica M, De Sarria MJ, Gavilan J: Quality of life in postlingually deaf patients following cochlear implantation. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2006;263:267-270.
39.
Lee H-Y, Park E-C, Kim HJ, Choi J-Y, Kim H-N: Cost-utility analysis of cochlear implants in Korea using different measures of utility. Acta Otolaryngol 2006;126:817-823.
40.
Lindemark F, Norheim OF, Johansson KA: Making use of equity sensitive QALYs: a case study on identifying the worse off across diseases. Cost Eff Resour Alloc 2014;12:16.
41.
Looi V, Mackenzie M, Bird P, Lawrenson R: Quality-of-life outcomes for adult cochlear implant recipients in New Zealand. NZ Med J 2011;124:21-34.
42.
Lovett RES, Kitterick PT, Hewitt CE, Summerfield AQ: Bilateral or unilateral cochlear implantation for deaf children: an observational study. Arch Dis Child 2010;95:107-112.
43.
Loy B, Warner-Czyz AD, Tong L, Tobey EA, Roland PS: The children speak: an examination of the quality of life of pediatric cochlear implant users. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2010;142:247-253.
44.
Manrique M, Ramos A, Morera C, et al: Analysis of the cochlear implant as a treatment technique for profound hearing loss in pre and postlocutive patients (in Spanish). Acta Otorrinolaringol Esp 2006;57:2-23.
45.
McKinnon BJ: Cost effectiveness of cochlear implants. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2014;22:344-348.
46.
Meserole RL, Carson CM, Riley AW, Wang NY, Quittner AL, Eisenberg LS, Tobey EA, Francis HW, Niparko JK: Assessment of health-related quality of life 6 years after childhood cochlear implantation. Qual Life Res 2014;23:719-731.
47.
Meyer A, Sie K, Skalicky A, Edwards TC, Schick B, Niparko J, Patrick DL: Quality of life in youth with severe to profound sensorineural hearing loss. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2013;139:294-300.
48.
Mo B, Lindbaek M, Harris S: Cochlear implants and quality of life: a prospective study. Ear Hear 2005;26:186-194.
49.
Monteiro E, Shipp D, Chen J, Nedzelski J, Lin V: Cochlear implantation: a personal and societal economic perspective examining the effects of cochlear implantation on personal income. J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2012; 41(Suppl 1):S43-S48.
50.
Necula V, Cosgarea M, Necula SE: Health-related quality of life in cochlear implanted patients in Romania. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 2013;77:216-222.
51.
Olze H, Gräbel S, Förster U, Zirke N, Huhnd LE, Haupt H, Mazurek B: Elderly patients benefit from cochlear implantation regarding auditory rehabilitation, quality of life, tinnitus, and stress. Laryngoscope 2012;122:196-203.
52.
Olze H, Szczepek AJ, Haupt H, Förster U, Zirke N, Gräbel S, Mazurek B: Cochlear implantation has a positive influence on quality of life, tinnitus, and psychological comorbidity. Laryngoscope 2011;121:2220-2227.
53.
O'Neill C, O'Donoghue GM, Archbold, SM, Normand C: A cost-utility analysis of pediatric cochlear implantation. Laryngoscope 2000; 110:156-160.
54.
O'Neill C, Archbold SM, O'Donoghue GM, McAlister DA, Nikolopoulos TP: Indirect costs, cost-utility variations and the funding of paediatric cochlear implantation. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 2001;58:53-57.
55.
O'Neill C, Lutman ME, Archbold SM, Gregory S, Nikolopoulos TP: Parents and their cochlear implanted child: questionnaire development to assess parental views and experiences. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 2004;68:149-160.
56.
Orabi AA, Mawman D, Al-Zoubi F, Saeed SR, Ramsden RT: Cochlear implant outcomes and quality of life in the elderly: Manchester experience over 13 years. Clin Otolaryngol 2006;31:116-122.
57.
Palmer CS, Niparko JK, Wyatt JR, Rothman M, de Lissovoy G: A prospective study of the cost-utility of the multichannel cochlear implant. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1999;125: 1221-1228.
58.
Patrick DL, Edwards TC, Skalicky AM, Schick B, Topolski TD, Kushalnagar P, Leng M, O'Neill-Kemp AM, Sie KS: Validation of a quality-of-life measure for deaf or hard of hearing youth. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2011;145:137-145.
59.
Perez-Mora R, Lassaletta L, Castro A, Herran B, San-Roman-Montero J, Valiente E, Gavilan J: Quality of life in hearing-impaired children with bilateral hearing devices. B-ENT 2012;8: 251.
60.
Ramos A, Guerra-Jimenez G, Rodriguez C, Borkoski S, Falcon JC, Perez D: Cochlear implants in adults over 60: a study of communicative benefits and the impact on quality of life. Cochlear Implants Int 2013;14:241-245.
61.
Ravens-Sieberer U, Bullinger M: Assessing health-related quality of life in chronically ill children with the German KINDL: first psychometric and content analytical results. Qual Life Res 1998;7:399-407.
62.
Rembar SH, Lind O, Romundstad P, Helvik AS: Psychological well-being among cochlear implant users: a comparison with the general population. Cochlear Implants Int 2012;13:41-49.
63.
Rembar S, Lind O, Arnesen H, Helvik AS: Effects of cochlear implants: a qualitative study. Cochlear Implants Int 2009;10:179-197.
64.
Riley AW, Forrest CB, Rebok GW, Starfield B, Green BF, Robertson JA, Friello P: The Child Report Form of the CHIP-Child Edition. Med Care 2004;42:221-231.
65.
Sach T, O'Neill C, Whynes DK, Archbold SM, O'Donoghue GM: Evidence of improving cost-effectiveness of pediatric cochlear implantation. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 2003;19:421-431.
66.
Sach TH, Barton GR: Interpreting parental proxy reports of (health-related) quality of life for children with unilateral cochlear implants. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 2007;71:435-445.
67.
Schorr EA, Roth FP, Fox NA: Quality of life for children with cochlear implants: perceived benefits and problems and the perception of single words and emotional sounds. J Speech Lang Hear Res 2009;52:141.
68.
Schulze-Gattermann H, Illg A, Schoenermark M, Lenarz T, Lesinski-Schiedat A: Cost-benefit analysis of pediatric cochlear implantation: German experience. Otol Neurotol 2002;23: 674-681.
69.
Seiber WJ, Groessl EJ, David KM, Ganiats TG, Kaplan RM: Quality of Well-Being Self- Administered (QWB-SA) Scale. San Diego, Health Services Research Center, University of California, 2008.
70.
Semenov YR, Martinez-Monedero R, Niparko JK: Cochlear implants: clinical and societal outcomes. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 2012;45:959-981.
71.
Semenov YR, Yeh ST, Seshamani M, Wang NY, Tobey EA, Eisenberg LS, Quittner AL, Frick KD, Niparko JK; CDaCI Investigative Team: Age-dependent cost-utility of pediatric cochlear implantation. Ear Hear 2013;34:402-412.
72.
Sparreboom M, Snik AF, Mylanus EA: Sequential bilateral cochlear implantation in children: quality of life. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2012;138:134-141.
73.
Spencer LJ, Tomblin JB, Gantz BJ: Growing up with a cochlear implant: education, vocation, and affiliation. J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ 2012;17:483-498.
74.
Stacey PC, Fortnum HM, Barton GR, Summerfield AQ: Hearing-impaired children in the United Kingdom. I. Auditory performance, communication skills, educational achievements, quality of life, and cochlear implantation. Ear Hear 2006;27:161-186.
75.
Steiner CA, Powe NR, Anderson GF: Coverage decisions for medical technology by managed care: relationship to organizational and physician payment characteristics. Am J Manag Care 1996;2:1321-1331.
76.
Summerfield AQ, Barton GR: Getting acceptable value for money from bilateral cochlear implantation. Cochlear Implants Int 2003; 4(Suppl 1):66-67.
77.
Summerfield AQ, Barton GR, Toner J, et al: Self-reported benefits from successive bilateral cochlear implantation in post-lingually deafened adults: randomised controlled trial. Int J Audiol 2006;45(Suppl 1):S99-S107.
78.
Summerfield AQ, Lovett RES, Bellenger H, Batten G: Estimates of the cost-effectiveness of pediatric bilateral cochlear implantation. Ear Hear 2010;31:611-624.
79.
Summerfield AQ, Marshall DH, Barton GR, Bloor KE: A cost-utility scenario analysis of bilateral cochlear implantation. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2002;128:1255-1262.
80.
Thebaut C: Dealing with moral dilemma raised by adaptive preferences in health technology assessment: the example of growth hormones and bilateral cochlear implants. Soc Sci Med 2013;99:102-109.
81.
UK Cochlear Implant Study Group: Criteria of candidacy for unilateral cochlear implantation in postlingually deafened adults II: cost-effectiveness analysis. Ear Hear 2004;25:336-360.
82.
Vermeire K, Brokx JPL, Wuyts FL, Cochet E, Hofkens A, Van De Heyning PH: Quality-of-life benefit from cochlear implantation in the elderly. Otol Neurotol 2005;26:188-195.
83.
Warner-Czyz AD, Loy B, Roland PS, Tong L, Tobey EA: Parent versus child assessment of quality of life in children using cochlear implants. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 2009;73:1423-1429.
84.
Warner-Czyz AD, Loy B, Tobey EA, Nakonezny P, Roland PS: Health-related quality of life in children and adolescents who use cochlear implants. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 2011;75:95-105.
85.
Weinberg N, Sterritt M: Disability and identity: a study of identity patterns in adolescents with hearing impairments. Rehabil Psychol 1986;31:95-102.
86.
Wyatt JR, Niparko JK, Rothman M, deLissovoy G: Cost utility of the multichannel cochlear implant in 258 profoundly deaf individuals. Laryngoscope 1996;106:816-821.
87.
Zhao F, Bai Z, Stephens D: The relationship between changes in self-rated quality of life after cochlear implantation and changes in individual complaints. Clin Otolaryngol 2008;33:427-434.
88.
Zullig KJ, Matthews MR, Gilman R, Valois RF, Huebner ES: Generic quality of life measures for children and adolescents; in Preedy VR, Watson RR (eds): Handbook of Disease Burdens and Quality of Life Measures. New York, Springer, 2010.
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.