Objective: The aim of this work was to describe the dimensions of the crista fenestra and determine its presence by means of high-resolution computed tomography (CT) for the purpose of cochlear implantation via the round window approach. Methods: A series of 10 adult human temporal bones underwent high-resolution CT scanning and were further dissected for microscopic study of the round window niche. Results: In all of the specimens, the round window membrane was fully visualized after the complete removal of bony overhangs. The crista fenestra was identified as a sharp bony crest located in the anterior and inferior borders of the niche; its area ranged from 0.28 to 0.80 mm2 (mean 0.51 ± 0.18). The proportion of the area occupied by the crista fenestra in the whole circumference of the round window ranged from 23 to 50% (mean 36%). We found a moderate positive correlation between the area of the niche and the dimensions of the crista fenestra (Spearman rho: 0.491). In every case, high-resolution CT scanning was unable to determine the presence of the crista fenestra. Conclusion: The crista fenestra occupies a variable but expressive area within the bony round window niche. Narrower round window niches tended to house smaller crests. The presence of the crista fenestra is an important obstacle to adequate access to the scala tympani. Nevertheless, a high-resolution CT scan provides no additional preoperative information with regard to its presence for the purpose of surgical access to the scala tympani via the round window niche.

1.
Adunka OF, Dillon MT, Adunka MC, King ER, Pillsbury HC, Buchman CA: Cochleostomy versus round window insertions: influence on functional outcomes in electric-acoustic stimulation of the auditory system. Otol Neurotol 2014;35:613-618.
2.
Atturo F, Barbara M, Rask-Andersen H: Is the human round window really round? An anatomic study with surgical implications. Otol Neurotol 2014;35:1354-1360.
3.
Briggs RJ, Tykocinski M, Xu J, Risi F, Svehla M, Cowan R, Stover T, Erfurt P, Lenarz T: Comparison of round window and cochleostomy approaches with a prototype hearing preservation electrode. Audiol Neurotol 2006;11(suppl 1):42-48.
4.
Cohen D, Blinder G, Perez R, Raveh D: Standardized computed tomographic imaging and dimensions of the round window niche. Int Tinnitus J 2005;11:158-162.
5.
Erixon E, Köbler S, Rask-Andersen H: Cochlear implantation and hearing preservation: results in 21 consecutively operated patients using the round window approach. Acta Otolatyngol 2012;132:923-931.
6.
Franz BKH, Clark GM, Bloom DM: Surgical anatomy of the round window with special reference to cochlear implantation. J Laryngol Otol 1987;101:97-102.
7.
Hamerschmidt R, Schuch LH, Rezende RK, Wiemes GR, Oliveira AK, Mocellin M: A comparison between neural response telemetry via cochleostomy or the round window approach in cochlear implantation. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol 2012;78:71-75.
8.
Havenith S, Lammers MJ, Tange RA, Trabalzini F, della Volpe A, van der Heijden GJJ, Grolman W: Hearing preservation surgery: cochleostomy or round window approach? A systematic review. Otol Neurotol 2013;34:667-674.
9.
House WF: Cochlear implants. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1976;85(suppl 27):1-93.
10.
Kang BJ, Kim AH: Comparison of cochlear implant performance after round window electrode insertion compared with traditional cochleostomy. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2013;148:822-826.
11.
Lavinsky L, Lavinsky-Wolff M, Lavinsky J: Transcanal cochleostomy in cochlear implantation: experience with 50 cases. Cochlear Implants Int 2010;11:228-232.
12.
Lavinsky-Wolff M, Lavinsky L, Dall'Igna C, Lavinsky L, Setogutti E, Viletti MC: Transcanal cochleostomy in cochlear implant surgery: long-term results of a cohort study. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol 2012;78:118-123.
13.
Leong AC, Jiang D, Agger A, Fitzgerald-O'Connor A: Evaluation of round window accessibility to cochlear implant insertion. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2013;270:1237-1242.
14.
Mom T, Bachy A, Houette A, Pavier Y, Pastourel R, Gabrillargues J, Saroul N, Gilain L, Avan P: Cochlear implantation through the round window with a straight slotted electrode array: optimizing the surgical procedure. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2016;273:853-858.
15.
Park E, Amoodi H, Kuthubutheen J, Chen JM, Nedzelski JM, Lin VY: Predictors of round window accessibility for adult cochlear implantation based on pre-operative CT scan: a prospective observational study. J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2015;44:20-26.
16.
Proctor B, Bollobas B, Niparko JK: Anatomy of the round window niche. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1986;95:444-446.
17.
Roland PS, Wright CG, Isaacson B: Cochlear implant electrode insertion: the round window revisited. Laryngoscope 2007;117:397-402.
18.
Singla A, Sahni D, Gupta AK, Loukas M, Aggarwal A: Surgical anatomy of round window and its implications for cochlear implication. Clin Anat 2013;27:331-336.
19.
Waltzman SB, Roland JT Jr: Cochlear Implants, ed 3. New York, Thieme, 2014.
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.