This study investigated long-term speech and language outcomes in 51 prelingually deaf children, adolescents and young adults who received cochlear implants (CIs) prior to 7 years of age and had used their implants for at least 7 years. Average speech perception scores were similar to those found in prior research with other samples of experienced CI users. Mean language test scores were lower than norm-referenced scores from nationally representative normal-hearing, typically developing samples, although a majority of the CI users scored within 1 standard deviation of the normative mean or higher on the Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test, Fourth Edition (63%), and the Clinical Evaluation of Language Fundamentals, Fourth Edition (69%). Speech perception scores were negatively associated with a meningitic etiology of hearing loss, older age at implantation, poorer preimplant unaided pure-tone average thresholds, lower family income and the use of ‘total communication'. Subjects who had used CIs for 15 years or more were more likely to have these characteristics and were more likely to score lower on measures of speech perception compared to those who had used CIs for 14 years or less. The aggregation of these risk factors in the >15 years of CI use subgroup accounts for their lower speech perception scores and may stem from more conservative CI candidacy criteria in use at the beginning of pediatric cochlear implantation.

Keywords:
Cochlear implant, Deafness, Language, Speech perception, Children, Prelingual hearing loss
1.
Beadle EAR, McKinley DJ, Nikolopoulos TP, Brough J, O'Donoghue GM, Archbol SM: Long-term functional outcomes and academic-occupational status in implanted children after 10 to 14 years of cochlear implant use. Otol Neurotol 2005;26:1152-1160.
2.
Davidson LS, Geers AE, Blamey PJ, Tobey EA, Brenner CA: Factors contributing to speech perception scores in long-term pediatric cochlear implant users. Ear Hear 2011;32(1 suppl): 19S-26S.
3.
Dunn D, Dunn L: Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test, ed 4. Minneapolis, Pearson Assessments, 2007.
4.
Geers AE: Factors affecting the development of speech, language, and literacy in children with early cochlear implantation. Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch 2002;33:172-183.
5.
Geers AE, Brenner CA, Tobey EA: Long-term outcomes of cochlear implantation in early childhood: sample characteristics and data collection methods. Ear Hear 2011;32(1 suppl): 2S-12S.
6.
Geers AE, Hayes H: Reading, writing, and phonological processing skills of adolescents with 10 or more years of cochlear implant experience. Ear Hear 2011;32(1 suppl):49S-59S.
7.
Geers AE, Sedey AL: Language and verbal reasoning skills in adolescents with 10 or more years of cochlear implant experience. Ear Hear 2011;32(1 suppl):39S-48S.
8.
Geers AE, Tobey EA, Moog J, Brenner CA: Long-term outcomes of cochlear implantation in the preschool years: from elementary grades to high school. Int J Audiol 2008;47(suppl 2): S21-S30.
9.
Holt R, Kirk KI, Pisoni DB, Burckhartzmeyer L, Lin A: Lexical and context effects in children's audiovisual speech recognition. J Acoust Soc Am 2005;118:1962-1962.
10.
Kirk KI, Pisoni DB: Lexical effects on spoken word recognition by pediatric cochlear implant users. Ear Hear 1995;16:470-481.
11.
Nilsson MJ, Soli SD, Gelnett DJ: Development of the Hearing in Noise Test for Children (HINT-C). Los Angeles, House Ear Institute, 1996.
12.
Niparko JK, Tobey EA, Thal DJ, Eisenberg LS, Wang N-Y, Quittner AL, Fink NE: Spoken language development in children following cochlear implantation. JAMA 2010;303:1498-1506.
13.
Semel E, Wiig E, Secord W: Clinical Evaluation of Language Fundamentals, ed 4. Minneapolis, Pearson Assessments, 2003.
14.
Spencer LJ, Gantz BJ, Knutson JF: Outcomes and achievement of students who grew up with access to cochlear implants. Laryngoscope 2004;114:1576-1581.
15.
Svirsky MA, Sloan RB, Caldwell M, Miyamoto RT: Speech intelligibility of prelingually deaf children with multichannel cochlear implants. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl 2000;185:123-125.
16.
Svirsky MA, Teoh SW, Neuberger H: Development of language and speech perception in congenitally, profoundly deaf children as a function of age at cochlear implantation. Audiol Neurootol 2004;9:224-233.
17.
Uziel AS, Sillon M, Vieu A, Artieres F, Piron JP, Daures JP, Mondain M: Ten-year follow-up of a consecutive series of children with multichannel cochlear implants. Otol Neurotol 2007;28:615-628.
© 2013 S. Karger AG, Basel
2013
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.