An alternative to bilateral cochlear implantation is offered by the Neurelec Digisonict SP Binaural cochlear implant, which allows stimulation of both cochleae within a single device. The purpose of this prospective study was to compare a group of Neurelec Digisonict SP Binaural implant users (denoted BINAURAL group, n = 7) with a group of bilateral adult cochlear implant users (denoted BILATERAL group, n = 6) in terms of speech perception, sound localization, and self-assessment of health status and hearing disability. Speech perception was assessed using word recognition at 60 dB SPL in quiet and in a ‘cocktail party’ noise delivered through five loudspeakers in the hemi-sound field facing the patient (signal-to-noise ratio = +10 dB). The sound localization task was to determine the source of a sound stimulus among five speakers positioned between –90° and +90° from midline. Change in health status was assessed using the Glasgow Benefit Inventory and hearing disability was evaluated with the Abbreviated Profile of Hearing Aid Benefit. Speech perception was not statistically different between the two groups, even though there was a trend in favor of the BINAURAL group (mean percent word recognition in the BINAURAL and BILATERAL groups: 70 vs. 56.7% in quiet, 55.7 vs. 43.3% in noise). There was also no significant difference with regard to performance in sound localization and self-assessment of health status and hearing disability. On the basis of the BINAURAL group’s performance in hearing tasks involving the detection of interaural differences, implantation with the Neurelec Digisonict SP Binaural implant may be considered to restore effective binaural hearing. Based on these first comparative results, this device seems to provide benefits similar to those of traditional bilateral cochlear implantation, with a new approach to stimulate both auditory nerves.

Keywords:
Cochlear implantation, Binaural, Bilateral, Speech discrimination, Sound localization
1.
Aronoff JM, Yoon YS, Freed DJ, Vermiglio AJ, Pal I, Soli SD: The use of interaural time and level difference cues by bilateral cochlear implant users. J Acoust Soc Am 2010;127:87–92.
2.
Bichey BG, Miyamoto RT: Outcomes in bilateral cochlear implantation. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2008;138:655–661.
3.
Bond M, Mealing S, Anderson R, Elston J, Weiner G, Taylor RS, Hoyle M, Liu Z, Price A, Stein K: The effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of cochlear implants for severe to profound deafness in children and adults: a systematic review and economic model. Health Technol Assess 2009;13:1–330.
4.
Buhagiar R, Lutman ME, Brinton JE, Eyles J: Localization performance of unilateral cochlear implant users for speech, tones and noise. Cochlear Implants Int 2004;5:96–104.
5.
Cox RM, Alexander GC: The abbreviated profile of hearing aid benefit. Ear Hear 1995;16:176–186.
6.
Damen GW, van den Oever-Goltstein MH, Langereis MC, Chute PM, Mylanus EA: Classroom performance of children with cochlear implants in mainstream education. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 2006;115:542–552.
7.
Di Lella F, Bacciu A, Pasanisi E, Vincenti V, Guida M, Bacciu S: Main peak interleaved sampling (MPIS) strategy: effect of stimulation rate variations on speech perception in adult cochlear implant recipients using the Digisonic SP cochlear implant. Acta Otolaryngol 2010;130:102–107.
8.
Dunn CC, Noble W, Tyler RS, Kordus M, Gantz BJ, Ji H: Bilateral and unilateral cochlear implant users compared on speech perception in noise. Ear Hear 2010;31:296–298.
9.
Dunn CC, Tyler RS, Oakley S, Gantz BJ, Noble W: Comparison of speech recognition and localization performance in bilateral and unilateral cochlear implant users matched on duration of deafness and age at implantation. Ear Hear 2008;29:352–359.
10.
Ertmer DJ, Goffman L: Speech production accuracy and variability in young cochlear implant recipients: comparisons with typically developing age-peers. J Speech Lang Hear Res 2011;54:177–189.
11.
Fetterman B, Domico E: Speech recognition in background noise of cochlear implant patients. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2002;126:257–263.
12.
Finley CC, Holden TA, Holden LK, Whiting BR, Chole RA, Neely GJ, Hullar TE, Skinner MW: Role of electrode placement as a contributor to variability in cochlear implant outcomes. Otol Neurotol 2008;29:920–928.
13.
Firszt JB, Holden LK, Skinner MW, Tobey EA, Peterson A, Gaggl W, Runge-Samuelson CL, Wackym PA: Recognition of speech presented at soft to loud levels by adult cochlear implant recipients of three cochlear implant systems. Ear Hear 2004;25:375–387.
14.
Fournier JE: Audiométrie vocale: les épreuves d’intelligibilité et leurs applications au diagnostic, à l’expertise et à la correction prothétique des surdités, Maloine, 1951.
15.
Friedland DR, Venick HS, Niparko JK: Choice of ear for cochlear implantation: the effect of history and residual hearing on predicted postoperative performance. Otol Neurotol 2003;24:582–589.
16.
Laszig R, Aschendorff A, Stecker M, Müller-Deile J, Maune S, Dillier N, Weber B, Hey M, Begall K, Lenarz T, Battmer RD, Böhm M, Steffens T, Strutz J, Linder T, Probst R, Allum J, Westhofen M, Doering W: Benefits of bilateral electrical stimulation with the nucleus cochlear implant in adults: 6-month postoperative results. Otol Neurotol 2004;25:958–968.
17.
Lazard DS, Bordure P, Lina-Granade G, Magnan J, Meller R, Meyer B, Radafy E, Roux PE, Gnansia D, Péan V, Truy E: Speech perception performance for 100 post-lingually deaf adults fitted with Neurelec cochlear implants: Comparison between Digisonict Convex and Digisonict SP devices after a 1-year follow-up. Acta Otolaryngol 2010;130:1267–1273.
18.
Litovsky RY, Parkinson A, Arcaroli J: Spatial hearing and speech intelligibility in bilateral cochlear implant users. Ear Hear 2009;30:419–431.
19.
Litovsky RY, Parkinson A, Arcaroli J, Sammeth C: Simultaneous bilateral cochlear implantation in adults: a multicenter clinical study. Ear Hear 2006;27:714–731.
20.
MED-EL: Summary of safety and effectiveness data. P000025. FDA; 2001. URL: http://www.fda.gov/cdrh/pdf/P000025b.pdf. Accessed July 2011.
21.
Mosnier I, Sterkers O, Bebear JP, Godey B, Robier A, Deguine O, Fraysse B, Bordure P, Mondain M, Bouccara D, Bozorg-Grayeli A, Borel S, Ambert-Dahan E, Ferrary E: Speech performance and sound localization in a complex noisy environment in bilaterally implanted adult patients. Audiol Neurotol 2009;14:106–114.
22.
Nava E, Bottari D, Portioli G, Bonfioli F, Beltrame MA, Formigoni P, Pavani F: Hearing again with two ears: recovery of spatial hearing after bilateral cochlear implantation. Neuropsychologia 2009;47:928–932.
23.
Neuman AC, Haravon A, Sislian N, Waltzam SB: Sound-direction identification with bilateral cochlear implants. Ear Hear 2007;28:73–82.
24.
Noble W, Tyler RS, Dunn CC, Bhullar N: Younger- and older-age adults with unilateral and bilateral cochlear implants: speech and spatial hearing self-ratings and performance. Otol Neurotol 2009;30:921–929.
25.
Ramsden R, Greenham P, O’Driscoll M, Mawman D, Proops D, Craddock L, Fielden C, Graham J, Meerton L, Verschuur C, Toner J, McAnallen C, Osborne J, Doran M, Gray R, Pickerill M: Evaluation of bilaterally implanted adult subjects with the nucleus 24 cochlear implant system. Otol Neurotol 2005;26:988–998.
26.
Robinson K, Gatehouse S, Browning GG: Measuring patient benefit from otorhinolaryngological surgery and therapy. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1996;105:415–422.
27.
Senn P, Kompis M, Vischer M, Haeusler R: Minimum audible angle, just noticeable interaural differences and speech intelligibility with bilateral cochlear implants using clinical speech processors. Audiol Neurootol 2005;10:342–352.
28.
Summerfield AQ, Barton GR, Toner J, McAnallen C, Proops D, Harries C, Cooper H, Court I, Gray R, Osborne J, Doran M, Ramsden R, Mawman D, O’Driscoll M, Graham J, Aleksy W, Meerton L, Verschure C, Ashcroft P, Pringle M: Self-reported benefits from successive bilateral cochlear implantation in post-lingually deafened adults: randomised controlled trial. Int J Audiol 2006;45(suppl 1):99–107.
29.
Summerfield AQ, Marshall DH, Barton GR, Bloor KE: A cost-utility scenario analysis of bilateral cochlear implantation. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2002;128:1255–1262.
30.
Truy E, Ionescu E, Ceruse P, Gallego S: The binaural digisonic cochlear implant: surgical technique. Otol Neurotol 2002;23:704–709.
31.
Tyler RS, Perreau AE, Ji H: Validation of the Spatial Hearing Questionnaire. Ear Hear 2009;30:466–474.
32.
Tyler RS, Noble W, Dunn C, Witt S: Some benefits and limitations of binaural cochlear implants and our ability to measure them. Int J Audiol 2006;45(suppl 1):113–119.
33.
Van Hoesel RJ, Tyler RS: Speech perception, localization, and lateralization with bilateral cochlear implants. J Acoust Soc Am 2003;113:1617–1630.
34.
Verhaert N, Lazard DS, Gnansia D, Bebear JP, Romanet P, Meyer B, Péan V, Mollard D, Truy E: Speech performance and sound localization abilities in Neurelec Digisonict SP Binaural cochlear implant users. Audiol Neurootol 2012;17:256–266.
35.
Zarandy MM, Malekpour M: Two cochlear implants: halving the number of recipients. Lancet 2007;17:1686.
© 2013 S. Karger AG, Basel
2013
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.