The number of pediatric cochlear implant (CI) recipients has increased substantially over the past 10 years, and it has become more important to understand the underlying mechanisms of the variable outcomes in this population. In this study, psychoacoustic measures of spectral-ripple and Schroeder-phase discrimination, the Clinical Assessment of Music Perception, and consonant-nucleus-consonant (CNC) word recognition in quiet and spondee reception threshold (SRT) in noise tests have been presented to 11 prelingually deafened CI users, aged 8–16 years with at least 5 years of CI experience. The children’s performance was compared to the previously reported results of postlingually deafened adult CI users. The average spectral-ripple threshold (n = 10) was 2.08 ripples/octave. The average Schroeder-phase discrimination was 67.3% for 50 Hz and 56.5% for 200 Hz (n = 9). The Clinical Assessment of Music Perception test showed that the average complex pitch direction discrimination was 2.98 semitones. The mean melody score was at a chance level, and the mean timbre score was 34.1% correct. The mean CNC word recognition score was 68.6%, and the mean SRT in steady noise was –8.5 dB SNR. The children’s spectral-ripple resolution, CNC word recognition, and SRT in noise performances were, within statistical bounds, the same as in a population of postlingually deafened adult CI users. However, Schroeder-phase discrimination and music perception were generally poorer than in the adults. It is possible then that this poorer performance seen in the children might be partly accounted for by the delayed maturation in their temporal processing ability, and because of this, the children’s performance may have been driven more by their spectral sensitivity.

Keywords:
Psychophysics, Music, Speech perception, Cochlear implant, Prelingual hearing loss
1.
Bradham T, Jones J: Cochlear implant candidacy in the United States: prevalence in children 12 months to 6 years of age. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 2008;7:1023–1028.
2.
Buss E, Hall JW 3rd, Grose JH, Dev MB: Development of adult-like performance in backward, simultaneous, and forward masking. J Speech Lang Hear Res 1999;4:844–849.
3.
Cazals Y, Pelizzone M, Saudan O, Boex C: Low-pass filtering in amplitude modulation detection associated with vowel and consonant identification in subjects with cochlear implants. J Acoust Soc Am 1994;4:2048–2054.
4.
Chen JK, Chuang AY, McMahon C, Hsieh JC, Tung TH, Li LP: Music training improves pitch perception in prelingually deafened children with cochlear implants. Pediatrics 2010;4:e793–e800.
5.
Dooling RJ, Leek MR, Gleich O, Dent ML: Auditory temporal resolution in birds: discrimination of harmonic complexes. J Acoust Soc Am 2002;2:748–759.
6.
Drennan WR, Longnion JK, Ruffin C, Rubinstein JT: Discrimination of Schroeder-phase harmonic complexes by normal-hearing and cochlear-implant listeners. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol 2008;1:138–149.
7.
Elfenbein JL, Small AM, Davis JM: Developmental patterns of duration discrimination. J Speech Hear Res 1993;4:842–849.
8.
Fu QJ: Temporal processing and speech recognition in cochlear implant users. Neuroreport 2002;13:1635–1639.
9.
Harris RW: Speech Audiometry Materials Compact Disk. Provo, Brigham Young University, 1991.
10.
Henry BA, Turner CW: The resolution of complex spectral patterns by cochlear implant and normal-hearing listeners. J Acoust Soc Am 2003;5:2861–2873.
11.
Henry BA, Turner CW, Behrens A: Spectral peak resolution and speech recognition in quiet: normal hearing, hearing impaired, and cochlear implant listeners. J Acoust Soc Am 2005;2:1111–1121.
12.
Kang R, Nimmons GL, Drennan W, Longnion J, Ruffin C, Nie K, Won JH, Worman T, Yueh B, Rubinstein J: Development and validation of the University of Washington Clinical Assessment of Music Perception test. Ear Hear 2009;4:411–418.
13.
Lauer AM, Molis M, Leek MR: Discrimination of time-reversed harmonic complexes by normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol 2009;4:609–619.
14.
Levitt H: Transformed up-down methods in psychoacoustics. J Acoust Soc Am 1971;2:(suppl 2):467.
15.
Nimmons GL, Kang RS, Drennan WR, Longnion J, Ruffin C, Worman T, Yueh B, Rubenstien JT: Clinical assessment of music perception in cochlear implant listeners. Otol Neurotol 2008;2:149–155.
16.
Oh SH, Kim CS, Kang EJ, Lee DS, Lee HJ, Chang SO, Ahn SH, Hwang CH, Park HJ, Koo JW: Speech perception after cochlear implantation over a 4-year time period. Acta Otolaryngol 2003;2:148–153.
17.
Oxenham AJ, Dau T: Towards a measure of auditory-filter phase response. J Acoust Soc Am 2001;6:3169–3178.
18.
Peterson GE, Lehiste I: Revised CNC lists for auditory tests. J Speech Hear Disord 1962;27:62–70.
19.
Plack CJ, Moore BC: Temporal window shape as a function of frequency and level. J Acoust Soc Am 1990;5:2178–2187.
20.
Saoji AA, Litvak L, Spahr AJ, Eddins DA: Spectral modulation detection and vowel and consonant identifications in cochlear implant listeners. J Acoust Soc Am 2009;3:955–958.
21.
Schroeder MR: Synthesis of low-peak-factor signals and binary sequences with low autocorrelation. IEEE Trans Inf Theory 1970; 16:85–89.
22.
Smith ZM, Delgutte B, Oxenham AJ: Chimaeric sounds reveal dichotomies in auditory perception. Nature 2002;6876:87–90.
23.
Stone MA, Fullgrabe C, Moore BC: Benefit of high-rate envelope cues in vocoder processing: effect of number of channels and spectral region. J Acoust Soc Am 2008;4:2272–2282.
24.
Summers V: Effects of hearing impairment and presentation level on masking period patterns for Schroeder-phase harmonic complexes. J Acoust Soc Am 2000;5:2307–2317.
25.
Summers V, Leek MR: Masking of tones and speech by Schroeder-phase harmonic complexes in normally hearing and hearing-impaired listeners. Hear Res 1998;1–2:139–150.
26.
Turner CW, Gantz BJ, Vidal C, Behrens A, Henry BA: Speech recognition in noise for cochlear implant listeners: benefits of residual acoustic hearing. J Acoust Soc Am 2004;4:1729–1735.
27.
Tyler RS, Rubinstein JT, Teagle H, Kelsay D, Gantz BJ: Pre-lingually deaf children can perform as well as post-lingually deaf adults using cochlear implants. Cochlear Implants Int 2000;1:39–44.
28.
Wightman F, Allen P, Dolan T, Kistler D, Jamieson D: Temporal resolution in children. Child Dev 1989;3:611–624.
29.
Won JH, Drennan WR, Kang RS, Rubinstein JT: Psychoacoustic abilities associated with music perception in cochlear implant users. Ear Hear 2010;6:796–805.
30.
Won JH, Drennan WR, Rubinstein JT: Spectral-ripple resolution correlates with speech reception in noise in cochlear implant users. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol 2007;3:384–392.
31.
Won JH, Drennan WR, Nie K, Jameyson EM, Rubinstein JT: Acoustic temporal modulation detection and speech perception in cochlear implant listeners. J Acoust Soc Am 2011;130:376–388.
32.
Xu L, Thompson CS, Pfingst BE: Relative contributions of spectral and temporal cues for phoneme recognition. J Acoust Soc Am 2005;5:3255–3267.
© 2012 S. Karger AG, Basel
2012
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.