Music plays an important role in the daily life of cochlear implant (CI) users, but electrical hearing and speech processing pose challenges for enjoying music. Studies of unilateral CI (UCI) users’ music perception have found that these subjects have little difficulty recognizing tempo and rhythm but great difficulty with pitch, interval and melody. The present study is an initial step towards understanding music perception in bilateral CI (BCI) users. The Munich Music Questionnaire was used to investigate music listening habits and enjoyment in 23 BCI users compared to 2 control groups: 23 UCI users and 23 normal-hearing (NH) listeners. Bilateral users appeared to have a number of advantages over unilateral users, though their enjoyment of music did not reach the level of NH listeners.

Anderson I, Baumgartner WD, Boeheim K, Nahler A, Arnolder C, D’Haese P: Telephone use: what benefit do cochlear implant users receive? Int J Audiol 2006;45:446–453.
Boyle D, Radocy R: Measurements and Evaluation of Musical Experiences. New York, Schirmer, 1987.
Brill S, Brockmeier SJ, Ressel L, Mueller J, Helms J: Music perception in bilateral CI with clinical CIS processors. Proceedings of the 5th Asia Pacific Symposium on Cochlear Implants and Related Sciences, Hong Kong, 2005.
Brockmeier SJ, Grasmeder M, Passow S, Mawmann D, Vischer M, Jappel A, Baumgartner W, Stark T, Mueller J, Brill S, Steffens T, Strutz J, Kiefer J, Baumann J, Arnold W: Comparison of musical activities of cochlear implant users with different speech-coding strategies. Ear Hear 2007;28(2 suppl):49S–51S.
Brockmeier SJ, Nopp P, Vischer M, Baumgartner W, Stark T, Schoen F, Mueller J, Braunschweig T, Busch R, Getto M, Arnold W, Allum DJ: Correlation of speech and music perception in postlingually deaf Combi 40/40+ users; in Kubo T, Takahashi Y, Iwaki T (eds): Cochlear Implants – An Update. The Hague, Kugler, 2002, pp 459–464.
Brown KD, Balkany TJ: Benefits of bilateral cochlear implantation: a review. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2007;15:315–318.
Buss E, Pillsbury HC, Buchman CA, Pillsbury CH, Clark MS, Haynes DS, Labadie RF, Amberg S, Roland PS, Kruger P, Novak MA, Wirth JA, Black JM, Peters R, Lake J, Wackym PA, Firszt JB, Wilson BS, Lawson DT, Schatzer R, D’Haese PS, Barco AL: Multicenter U.S. bilateral MED-EL cochlear implantation study: speech perception over the first year of use. Ear Hear 2008;29:20–32.
Farlow PA: Use of Music Therapy for Hearing-Impaired Children with Cochlear Implants. 1998.
Fitzgerald D, Fitzgerald H, Brockmeier SJ, Searle O, Grebenev L, Nopp P: Musical Sounds in Cochlear Implants (Mu.S.I.C) Test. Innsbruck, MED-EL, 2006.
Fujita S, Ito J: Ability of nucleus cochlear implantees to recognize music. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1999;108:634–640.
Gfeller K, Christ A, Knutson JF, Witt S, Mehr M: The effects of familiarity on appraisal of complex songs by cochlear implant recipients and normal hearing adults. J Music Ther 2003;40:72–112.
Gfeller K, Christ A, Knutson JF, Witt S, Murray KT, Tyler RS: Musical backgrounds, listening habits, and aesthetic enjoyment of adult cochlear implant recipients. J Am Acad Audiol 2000;7:390–406.
Gfeller K, Knutson JF: Music to the impaired or implanted ear. Psychosocial implications for aural rehabilitation. 2003. (accessed January 2008).
Gfeller K, Turner C, Mehr M: Recognition of familiar melodies by adult cochlear implant recipients and normal-hearing adults. Cochlear Implants Int 2002a;3:29–53.
Gfeller K, Witt S, Woodworth G, Mehr MA, Knutson J: Effects of frequency, instrumental family, and cochlear implant type on timbre recognition and appraisal. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 2002b;111:349–356.
Gfeller K, Woodworth G, Robin DA, Witt S, Knutson JF: Perception of rhythmic and sequential pitch patterns by normally hearing adults and adult cochlear implant users. Ear Hear 1997;18:252–260.
Johnstone PM, Litovsky RY: Effect of masker type and age on speech intelligibility and spatial release from masking in children and adults. J Acoust Soc Am 2006;120:2177–2189.
Jourdain R: Music, the Brain, and Ecstasy: How Music Captures our Imagination. New York, Avon, 1998.
Kong YY, Cruz R, Jones JA, Zeng FG: Music perception with temporal cues in acoustic and electric hearing. Ear Hear 2004;25:173–185.
Leal MC, Shin YJ, Laborde ML, Calmels MN, Verges S, Lugardon S, Andrieu S, Deguine O, Fraysse B: Music perception in adult cochlear implants recipients. Acta Otolaryngol 2003;123:826–835.
Litovsky R, Johnstone P, Godar S: Benefits of bilateral cochlear implants and/or hearing aids in children. Int J Audiol 2006a;45(suppl 1):S78–S91.
Litovsky R, Parkinson A, Arcaroli J, Sammeth C: Simultaneous bilateral cochlear implantation in adults: a multicenter clinical study. Ear Hear 2006b;27:714–731.
Looi V, McDermott HJ, McKay CM, Hickson L: Pitch discrimination and melody recognition by cochlear implant users; in: International Congress Series. Amsterdam, Elsevier, 2004, vol 1273: Cochlear Implants. Proceedings of the VIII International Cochlear Implant Conference, pp 197–200.
Mawman DJ, Ramsden RT, O’Driscoll M, Adams T, Saeed RS: Bilateral cochlear implantation – a case report. Adv Otorhinolaryngol 2000;57:360–363.
McDermott HJ: Music perception with cochlear implants: a review. Trends Amplif 2004;8:49–82.
McDermott HJ, Looi V: Perception of complex signals, including musical sounds, with cochlear implants; in: International Congress Series. Amsterdam, Elsevier, 2004, vol 1273: Cochlear Implants. Proceedings of the VIII International Cochlear Implant Conference, pp 201–204.
McDermott HJ, McKay CM: Musical pitch perception with electrical stimulation of the cochlea. J Acoust Soc Am 1997;101:1622–1631.
Mueller J, Schoen F, Helms J: Bilateral cochlear implants – new aspects for the future? Adv Otorhinolaryngol 2000;57:22–27.
Mueller J, Schoen F, Helms J: Speech understanding in quiet and noise in bilateral users of the MED-EL COMBI 40/40+ cochlear implant system. Ear Hear 2002;23:198–206.
Pankseep J: The emotional sources of ‘Chills’ induced by music. Music Percept 1995;13:171–207.
Pijl S, Schwartz DW: Intonation of musical intervals by musical intervals by deaf subjects stimulated with single bipolar cochlear implant electrodes. Hear Res 1995;89:203–211.
Schleich P, Nopp P, D’Haese P: Head shadow, squelch and summation effects in bilateral users of the MED-EL COMBI 40/40+ cochlear implant. Ear Hear 2004;25:197–204.
Schoen F, Mueller J, Helms J: Speech perception thresholds obtained in a symmetrical four-loudspeaker arrangement from bilateral users of MED-EL cochlear implants. Otol Neurotol 2002;23:710–714.
Schulz E, Kerber M: Music perception with the MED-EL implants; in Hochmair-Desoyer IJ, Hochmaier ES (eds): Advances in Cochlear Implants. Vienna, Manz, 1994, pp 326–332.
Szelag E, Kolodzieczyk I, Kanabus M, Szuchnik J, Senderski A: Deficits of non-verbal auditory perception in postlingually deaf humans using cochlear implants. Neurosci Lett 2004;355:49–52.
Tyler RS, Dunn CC, Witt SA, Noble WG: Speech perception and localization with adults with bilateral sequential cochlear implants. Ear Hear 2007;28:86S–90S.
Van Hoesel RJ, Clark GM: Fusion and lateralization study with two binaural cochlear implant subjects. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl 1995;166:233–235.
Van Hoesel RJ, Tong YC, Hollow RD, Clark GM: Psychophysical and speech perception studies: a case report on a binaural cochlear implant subject. J Acoust Soc Am 1993;94:3178–3189.
Wackym PA, Runge-Samuelson CL, Firszt JB, Alkaf FM, Burg LS: More challenging speech-perception tasks demonstrate binaural benefit in bilateral cochlear implant users. Ear Hear 2007;28:80S–85S.
Zeng FG: Trends in cochlear implants. Trends Amplif 2004;8:1–34.
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.