Bilateral cochlear implants (CIs) may offer deaf children a range of advantages compared to unilateral CIs. However, speech perception in noise is mainly facilitated by better-ear effects and much less by interaural comparisons or true ‘binaural’ hearing. Little is known about the development of the binaural auditory system with CIs provided at a young age. It is possible that, as with adults, binaural sensitivity exists but is not accessed due to technical limitations in electrical stimulation methods. In this paper, we present results on binaural hearing in children with bilateral CIs. Binaural masking level differences (BMLDs) were measured for a 180-degree phase shift in a 125-Hz sinusoid, presented in a 50-Hz-wide noise band and modulating a 1000-pps carrier pulse train. Stimuli were presented to a single electrode in the middle of the electrode array at both ears. Eight children between 6 and 15 years of age participated in this study. Six children had a significantly better detection threshold when the signal was out of phase (dichotic) between two ears than when it was in phase (diotic), with a mean difference (BMLD) of 6.4 dB. The present results show that children with bilateral CIs are sensitive to binaural cues in electrical stimuli, similar to adults, even when implants are provided at a later age and with a longer delay between implantations.

Keywords:
Cochlear implant, children, Binaural squelch, Masking level difference, Interaural cues
1.
Blanks DA, Roberts JM, Buss E, Hall JW, Fitzpatrick DC: Neural and behavioral sensitivity to interaural time differences using amplitude modulated tones with mismatched carrier frequencies. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol 2007;8:393–408.
2.
Boets B, Wouters J, van Wieringen A, Ghesquière P: Auditory temporal information processing in preschool children at family risk for dyslexia: relations with phonological abilities and developing literacy skills. Brain Lang 2006;97:64–79.
3.
Buss E, Pillsbury HC, Buchman CA, Pillsbury CH, Clark MS, Haynes DS, Labadie RF, Amberg S, Roland PS, Kruger P, Novak MA, Wirth JA, Black JM, Peters R, Lake J, Wackym PA, Firszt JB, Wilson BS, Lawson DT, Schatzer R, D’Haese PS, Barco AL: Multicenter US bilateral MED-EL cochlear implantation study: speech perception over the first year of use. Ear Hear 2008;29:20–32.
4.
Declaration of Helsinki, adopted by the 18th World Medical Assembly, Helsinki, Finland, 1964, and revised by the 29th World Medical Assembly, Tokyo, Japan, 1975.
5.
Francart T, van Wieringen A, Wouters J: APEX 3: a multi-purpose test platform for auditory psychophysical experiments. J Neurosci Methods 2008;172:283–293.
6.
Furst M, Bresloff I, Levine RA, Merlob PL, Attias JJ: Interaural time coincidence detectors are present at birth: evidence from binaural interaction. Hear Res 2004;187:63–72.
7.
Galvin KL, Mok M, Dowell RC: Perceptual benefit and functional outcomes for children using sequential bilateral cochlear implants. Ear Hear 2007;28:470–482.
8.
Greenwood DD: A cochlear frequency-position function for several species – 29 years later. J Acoust Soc Am 1990;87:2592–2605.
9.
Hafter ER, Carrier SC: Masking-level differences obtained with a pulsed tonal masker. J Acoust Soc Am 1970;47:1041–1047.
10.
Hirsh IJ: The influence of interaural phase on interaural summation and inhibition. J Acoust Soc Am 1948;20:536–544.
11.
King AJ, Parsons CH, Moore DR: Plasticity in the neural coding of auditory space in the mammalian brain. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2000;97:11821–11828.
12.
Laneau J, Boets B, Moonen M, van Wieringen A, Wouters J: A flexible auditory research platform using acoustic or electric stimuli for adults and young children. J Neurosci Methods 2005;142:131–136.
13.
Levitt H: Transformed up-down methods in psychoacoustics. J Acoust Soc Am 1971;49:467–477.
14.
Litovsky RY, Johnstone PM, Godar SP: Benefits of bilateral cochlear implants and/or hearing aids in children. Int J Audiol 2006;45(suppl 1):S78–S91.
15.
Long CJ, Carlyon RP, Litovsky RY: Binaural unmasking with ‘transposed’ stimuli in bilateral cochlear implant users. Conference on Implantable Auditory Prostheses, 2007.
16.
Long CJ, Carlyon RP, Litovsky RY, Downs DH: Binaural unmasking with bilateral cochlear implants. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol 2006;7:352–360.
17.
Long CJ, Eddington DK, Colburn HS, Rabinowitz WM: Binaural sensitivity as a function of interaural electrode position with a bilateral cochlear implant user. J Acoust Soc Am 2003;114:1565–1574.
18.
Mok M, Galvin KL, Dowell RC, McKay CM: Spatial unmasking and binaural advantage for children with normal hearing, a cochlear implant and a hearing aid, and bilateral implants. Audiol Neurootol 2007;12:295–306.
19.
Moore DR: Effects of early auditory experience on development of binaural pathways in the brain. Semin Perinatol 1990;14:294–298.
20.
Payton ME, Greenstone MH, Schenker N: Overlapping confidence intervals or standard error intervals: what do they mean in terms of statistical significance? J Insect Sci 2003;3:1–6.
21.
Peters BR, Litovsky R, Parkinson A, Lake J: Importance of age and postimplantation experience on speech perception measures in children with sequential bilateral cochlear implants. Otol Neurotol 2007;28:649–657.
22.
Ponton CW, Don M, Eggermont JJ, Waring MD, Masuda A: Maturation of human cortical auditory function: differences between normal-hearing children and children with cochlear implants. Ear Hear 1996;17:430–437.
23.
Ponton CW, Eggermont JJ, Don M, Waring MD, Kwong B, Cunningham J, Trautwein P: Maturation of the mismatch negativity: effects of profound deafness and cochlear implant use. Audiol Neurootol 2000;5:167–185.
24.
Reiss LA, Turner CW, Erenberg SR, Gantz BJ: Changes in pitch with a cochlear implant over time. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol 2007;8:241–257.
25.
Trahiotis C, Bernstein LR, Buell TN, Spektor Z: On the use of adaptive procedures in binaural experiments. J Acoust Soc Am 1990;87:1359–1361.
26.
Van Deun L, van Wieringen A, Van den Bogaert T, Scherf F, Offeciers FE, Van de Heyning PH, Desloovere C, Dhooge IJ, Deggouj N, Wouters J: Sound localization, sound lateralization and binaural masking level differences in young children with normal hearing. Ear Hear 2009;30: in press.
27.
Van Hoesel R, Bohm M, Pesch J, Vandali A, Battmer RD, Lenarz T: Binaural speech unmasking and localization in noise with bilateral cochlear implants using envelope and fine-timing based strategies. J Acoust Soc Am 2008;123:2249–2263.
28.
Van Hoesel RJM: Exploring the benefits of bilateral cochlear implants. Audiol Neurootol 2004;9:234–246.
29.
Wichmann FA, Hill NJ: The psychometric function. I. Fitting, sampling, and goodness of fit. Percept Psychophys 2001a;63:1293–1313.
30.
Wichmann FA, Hill NJ: The psychometric function. II. Bootstrap-based confidence intervals and sampling. Percept Psychophys 2001b;63:1314–1329.
© 2009 S. Karger AG, Basel
2009
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.