The aim of this study was to determine whether the greater medial-lateral (ML) instability observed in patients with compensated unilateral vestibular loss (UVL), tested on a seesaw platform with eyes closed, is task-dependent. UVL patients, categorized into three groups according to time since lesion (1 week, 1 month and 1 year), bilateral vestibular loss patients and age-matched healthy control subjects were tested in three dynamic postural tasks. These tasks involved different supports – a seesaw platform (Satel), a platform generating horizontal linear translations (Synapsys) and foam rubber placed on a static platform – each requiring different somatosensory cues to maintain equilibrium. Displacements of the subjects’ center of pressure in both the anterior-posterior (AP) and ML directions were recorded by strain gauges within the platforms. Only tests performed with eyes closed were analyzed. Bilateral vestibular loss patients fell during foam and seesaw trials but not on the platform generating translations. We previously reported that UVL patients had greater postural oscillations on the seesaw platform in the ML compared to AP direction. In this study, we show similar ML/AP differences in patient performance on foam when standing with ‘feet close together’. In contrast, these differences were not found when patients were tested on linear translation or on foam standing with feet apart. In conclusion, the postural performance of patients with vestibular loss depends on the exact task used to measure postural stability. UVL patients are less stable when subjected to movement in the ML direction because of the biomechanical constraints of the tasks and/or the availability of proprioceptive information.

1.
Allum JH, Adkin AL, Carpenter MG, Held-Ziolkowska M, Honegger F, Pierchala K: Trunk sway measures of postural stability during clinical balance tests: effects of a unilateral vestibular deficit. Gait Posture 2001;14:227–237.
2.
Allum JH, Carpenter MG, Honegger F: Directional aspects of balance corrections in man. IEEE Eng Med Biol Mag 2003;22:37–47.
3.
Allum JH, Honegger F, Schicks H: The influence of a bilateral peripheral vestibular deficit on postural synergies. J Vestib Res 1994;4:49–70.
4.
Allum JH, Zamani F, Adkin AL, Ernst A: Differences between trunk sway characteristics on a foam support surface and on the Equitest ankle-sway-referenced support surface. Gait Posture 2002;16:264–270.
5.
Aoki M, Ito Y, Burchill P, Brookes GB, Gresty MA: Tilted perception of the subjective ‘upright’ in unilateral loss of vestibular function. Am J Otol 1999;20:741–747.
6.
Baloh RW, Fife TD, Zwerling L, Socotch T, Jacobson K, Bell T, Beykirch K: Comparison of static and dynamic posturography in young and older normal people. J Am Geriatr Soc 1994;42:405–412.
7.
Bloem BR, Allum JH, Carpenter MG, Verschuuren JJ, Honegger F: Triggering of balance corrections and compensatory strategies in a patient with total leg proprioceptive loss. Exp Brain Res 2002;142:91–107.
8.
Borel L, Harlay F, Magnan J, Chays A, Lacour M: Deficits and recovery of head and trunk orientation and stabilization after unilateral vestibular loss. Brain 2002;125:880–894.
9.
Carpenter MG, Allum JHJ, Honegger F: Vestibular influences on human postural control in combinations of pitch and roll planes reveal differences in spatiotemporal processing. Exp Brain Res 2001;140:95–111.
10.
Colebatch JG, Halmagyi GM, Skuse NF: Myogenic potentials generated by a click-evoked vestibulocollic reflex. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1994;57:190–197.
11.
Deliagina T, Beloozerova IN, Popova LB, Sirota MG, Swadlow HA, Grant G, Orlovsky GN: Role of different sensory inputs for maintenance of body posture in sitting rat and rabbit. Motor Control 2000;4:439–452.
12.
Fetter M, Diener HC, Dichgans J: Recovery of postural control after an acute unilateral vestibular lesion in humans. J Vestib Res 1990;1:373–383.
13.
Fish U: The vestibular responses following unilateral vestibular neurectomy. Acta Otolaryngol 1973;76:229–238.
14.
Halmagyi GM, Curthoys IS: A clinical sign of canal paresis. Arch Neurol 1988;45:737–739.
15.
Horak FB, Buchanan J, Creath R, Jeka J: Vestibulospinal control of posture. Adv Exp Med Biol 2002;508:139–145.
16.
Horak FB, Hlavacka F: Somatosensory loss increases vestibulospinal sensitivity. J Neurophysiol 2001;86:575–585.
17.
Inglis JT, Horak FB, Shupert CL, Jones-Rycewicz C: The importance of somatosensory information in triggering and scaling automatic postural responses in humans. Exp Brain Res 1994;101:159–164.
18.
Lacour M, Roll JP, Appaix M: Modifications and development of spinal reflexes in the alert baboon (Papio papio) following an unilateral vestibular neurotomy. Brain Res 1976;113:255–269.
19.
Macpherson JM, Inglis JT: Stance and balance following bilateral labyrinthectomy. Prog Brain Res 1993;97:219–228.
20.
Maki BE, Holliday PJ, Topper AK: A prospective study of postural balance and risk of falling in an ambulatory and independent elderly population. J Gerontol 1994;49:M72–M84.
21.
Maurer C, Mergner T, Bolha B, Hlavacka F: Vestibular, visual, and somatosensory contributions to human control of upright stance. Neurosci Lett 2000;281:99–102.
22.
Mbongo F, Patko T, Vidal PP, Vibert N, Tran Ba Huy P, de Waele C: Postural control in patients with unilateral vestibular lesions is more impaired in the roll than in the pitch plane: a static and dynamic posturography study. Audiol Neurootol 2005;10:291–302.
23.
Runge CF, Shupert CL, Horak FB, Zajac FE: Role of vestibular information in initiation of rapid postural responses. Exp Brain Res 1998;122:403–412.
24.
Statler KD, Wrisley DM, Okita N, Horak FB, Peterka RJ: Chronic unilateral vestibular loss impairs vestibular-somatosensory reweighting for posture control (abstract 272.14A6). Soc Neurosci 33rd Annu Meet, 2003, New Orleans.
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.