The present study examined the long-term consequences of otitis media (OM) on speech perception abilities in noise. 55 children with a prospective 3-monthly documented middle-ear status and hearing loss between birth and 24 months completed a ‘speech-in-noise’ (SPiN) test at the age of 7 years. Both hearing loss and the cumulation of uni- and bilateral OM incidents in early life were significantly correlated to the performance on the SPiN test at school age. Other background factors such as socio-economic status, language perception and cognitive development did not predict the performance on the SPiN test. Only the language production score at age 7 was also significantly related to the score on the SPiN test. The present study deals with the risk of OM in early life and its accompanied hearing loss on auditory processing, specifically speech perception in noise, up to school age.

1.
Anteunis LJC, Engel JAM: Maastricht Otitis Media with Effusion Study; PhD thesis, Maastricht, 2000.
2.
ASHA: American Speech Language Hearing Association. Guidelines for Audiologic Screening. Rockville, ASHA, 1997.
3.
Bayley N: Bayley Scales of Infant Development. New York, Psychological Corp, 1969.
4.
Bennett KE, Haggard MP: Behaviour and cognitive outcomes from middle ear disease. Arch Dis Child 1999;80:28–35.
5.
Biesalski P: Technique et jugement de l’audiométrie du nourrisson. La sourdité du premier âge. Besançon, Campanov, 1971.
6.
Casselbrant ML, Brostoff LM, Cantekin EI, Flaherty MR, Doyle WJ, Bluestone CD, Fria TJ: Otitis media with effusion in preschool children. Laryngoscope 1985;95:428–436.
7.
Casselbrant ML, Mandel EM: Epidemiology; in Rosenfeld RM, Bluestone CD (eds): Evidence-Based Otitis Media, ed 2. London/Hamilton, BC Decker, 2003, pp 147–150.
8.
Doyle KY, Kong YY, Strobel K, Dallaire P, Ray RM: Neonatal middle ear effusion predicts chronic otitis media with effusion. Otol Neurotol 2004;25:318–322.
9.
Engel J, Anteunis L, Chenault M, Marres E: Otoscopic findings in relation to tympanometry during infancy. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2000;257:366–371.
10.
Engel J, Anteunis L, Volovics A, Hendriks J, Marres E: Prevalence rates of otitis media with effusion from 0 to 2 years of age: healthy-born versus high-risk-born infants. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 1999;47:243–251.
11.
Fallon M, Trehub SE, Schneider BA: Children’s perception of speech in multitalker babble. J Acoust Soc Am 2000;108:3023–3029.
12.
Gravel JS, Roberts JE, Roush J, Grose J, Besing J, Burchinal M, Neebe E, Wallace IF, Zeisel SA: Early otitis media with effusion, hearing loss, and auditory processes at school age. Ear Hear 2006;27:353–368.
13.
Gravel JS, Wallace IF: Listening and language at 4 Years of age: effects of early otitis media. J Speech Lang Hear Res 1992;35:588–595.
14.
Hall JW, Grose JH: The effect of otitis media with effusion on the masking-level difference and the auditory brainstem response. J Speech Lang Hear Res 1993;6:210–217.
15.
Hartley DE, Moore DR: Effects of otitis media with effusion on auditory temporal resolution. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 2005;69:757–769.
16.
Howie VM, Ploussard JH, Sloyer J: The otitis-prone condition. Am J Dis Child 1975;129:676–678.
17.
Jerger J: Clinical experience with impedance audiometry. Arch Otolaryngol 1970;92:311–324.
18.
Keogh T, Kei J, Driscoll C, Cahill L, Hoffmann A, Wilce E, Kondamuri P, Marinac J: Measuring the ability of schoolchildren with a history of otitis media to understand everyday speech. J Am Acad Audiol 2005;165:301–311.
19.
Lous J, Fiellau-Nikolajsen M: Epidemiology of middle ear effusion and tubal dysfunction. A one-year prospective study comprising monthly tympanometry in 387 non-selected 7-year-old children. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 1981;3:303–317.
20.
Majerus S, Amand P, Bonvier V, Demanez JP, Demanez L, Van der Linden M: A quantitative and qualitative assessment of verbal short-term memory and phonological processing in 8-year-olds with a history of repetitive otitis media. J Commun Disord 2005;38:473–498.
21.
Marchant CD, Shurin PA, Turczyk VA, Wasikowski DE, Tutihasi MA, Kinney SE: Course and outcome of otitis media in early infancy: a prospective study. J Pediatr 1984;104:826–831.
22.
Moore DR, Hine JE, Jiang ZD, Matsuda H, Parsons CH, King AJ: Conductive hearing loss produces a reversible binaural hearing impairment. J Neurosci 1999;19:8704–8711.
23.
Moore DR, Hogan SC, Kacelnik O, Parsons CH, Rose MM, King AJ: Auditory learning as a cause and treatment of central dysfunction. Audiol Neurootol 2001;6:216–220.
24.
Moore JK: Maturation of human auditory cortex: implications for speech perception. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl 2002;189:7–10.
25.
Pape JH: Spraakverstaan in achtergrondlawaai bij kinderen (Speech-in-Noise perception of children). Stem Spraak Taalpathol 1993;2:178–191.
26.
Plomp R: A signal-to-noise ratio model for the speech-reception threshold of the hearing impaired. J Speech Hear Res 1986;29:146–154.
27.
Plomp R, Mimpen AR: Improving the reliability of testing the speech reception threshold for sentences. Audiology 1979;181:43–52.
28.
Roberts JE, Burchinal MR, Davis BP, Collier AM, Henderson FW: Otitis media in early childhood and later language. J Speech Hear Res 1991;34:1158–1168.
29.
Rovers M, Straatman H, Ingels K, van der Wilt G, van den Broek P, Zielhuis GA: The effect of ventilation tubes on laguage development in infants with otitis media with effusion: A randomized trial. Pediatrics 2000;106:E42.
30.
Schilder AG, Snik AF, Straatman H, van den Broek P: The effect of otitis media with effusion at preschool age on some aspects of auditory perception at school age. Ear Hear 1994;153:224–231.
31.
Stuermer IW, Scheich H: Early unilateral auditory deprivation increases 2-deoxyglucose uptake in contralateral auditory cortex of juvenile Mongolian gerbils. Hear Res 2000;146:185–199.
32.
Suzuki T: Conditioned orientation audiometry. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1961;74:192–198.
33.
Van der Meulen BF, Smrkovský M: Bayley Ontwikkelingsschalen (Bayley Scales of Infant Development). Groningen, Academisch Proefschrift RUG, 1984.
34.
Werker JF, Tees RC: Speech perception as a window for understanding plasticity and commitment in language systems of the brain. Dev Psychobiol 2005;46:233–251.
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.