Benign paroxysmal positional vertigo (BPPV) due to canalithiasis can be treated with particle repositioning manoeuvres, which aim to evacuate trapped particles from the semicircular canals (SCC). The movement of particles within the SCC is affected by gravity as well as by the accelerations of the head during the manoeuvres. Moreover, as experienced by the particles, gravity is indistinguishable from an upward acceleration of the SCC in free space. We used a set of three orthogonal linear accelerometers to measure the net three-dimensional linear acceleration vector acting on the head during the Hallpike manoeuvre and Epley and Semont particle repositioning manoeuvres (which are used to treat posterior canal BPPV). The projection of the net acceleration vector onto the SCC planes showed that both the Epley and Semont manoeuvres approximated to stepwise, 360°, backward rotations in the plane of the targeted posterior canal. Angular velocity measurements however showed that the rotational component during the central stages of these two manoeuvres is opposite in direction. A simple model of head rotations during particle repositioning manoeuvres was created which showed good agreement to the linear acceleration measurements. Analysis of modelled and measured data identified that speed of movement during the Semont manoeuvre should be critical to its clinical success.

Keywords:
Benign paroxysmal positional vertigo, Particle repositioning manoeuvres, Hallpike manoeuvre, Epley manoeuvre, Semont manoeuvre
1.
Blanks RH, Curthoys IS, Markham CH: Planar relationships of the semicircular canals in man. Acta Otolaryngol 1975;80:185–196.
2.
Dix MR, Hallpike CS: The pathology, symptomatology and diagnosis of certain common disorders of the vestibular system. Proc R Soc Med 1952;45:341–354.
3.
Epley JM: The canalith repositioning procedure: for treatment of benign paroxysmal positional vertigo. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1992;107:399–404.
4.
Furman JM, Cass SP, Briggs BC: Treatment of benign positional vertigo using heels-over-head rotation. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1998;107:1046–1053.
5.
Furuya M, Suzuki M, Sato H: Experimental study of speed-dependent positional nystagmus in benign paroxysmal positional vertigo. Acta Otolaryngol 2002;123:709–712.
6.
Hall SF, Ruby RRF, McClure JA: The mechanics of benign paroxysmal vertigo. J Otolaryngol 1979;8:151–158.
7.
House MG, Honrubia V: Theoretical models for the mechanisms of benign paroxysmal positional vertigo. Audiol Neurootol 2003;8:91–99.
8.
Kleppner D, Kolenkow RJ: An Introduction to Mechanics (International Student Edition). Singapore, McGraw-Hill, 1978, p 346.
9.
Lempert T, Gresty MA, Bronstein AM: Benign positional vertigo: recognition and treatment. BMJ 1995;311:489–491.
10.
Lempert T, Wolsley C, Davies R, Gresty MA, Bronstein AM: Three hundred sixty-degree rotation of the posterior semicircular canal for treatment of benign positional vertigo: a placebo-controlled trial. Neurology 1997;49:729–733.
11.
Nakayama M, Epley JM: BPPV and variants: improved treatment results with automated, nystagmus-based repositioning. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2005;133:107–112.
12.
Radtke A, von Brevern M, Tiel-Wilck K, Mainz-Perchalla A, Neuhauser H, Lempert T: Self-treatment of benign paroxysmal positional vertigo: Semont maneuver vs Epley procedure. Neurology 2004;63:150–152.
13.
Rajguru SM, Ifediba MA, Rabbitt RD: Three-dimensional biomechanical model of benign paroxysmal positional vertigo. Ann Biomed Eng 2004;32:831–846.
14.
Rajguru SM, Rabbitt RD: Afferent responses during experimentally induced semicircular canalithiasis. J Neurophysiol 2007;97:2355–2363.
15.
Semont A, Freyss G, Vitte E: Curing the BPPV with a liberatory maneuver. Adv Otorhinolaryngol 1988;42:290–293.
16.
Solomon D: Benign paroxysmal positional vertigo. Curr Treat Options Neurol 2000;2:417–428.
17.
Viirre E, Purcell I, Baloh RW: The Dix-Hallpike test and the canalith repositioning maneuver. Laryngoscope 2005;115:184–187.
18.
Zappa B, Legnani G, van den Bogert AJ, Adamini R: On the number and placement of accelerometers for angular velocity and acceleration determination. J Dyn Syst Meas Control 2001;123:552–554.
© 2008 S. Karger AG, Basel
2008
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.