Cochlear implant surgery has become a successful procedure for deaf patients to restore their hearing again. Some of the patients, however, complain of persisting dizziness after the surgery which can have a major impact on their quality of life. Neurotological tests of the vestibular system were applied in a total of 18 cochlear implantees pre- and postoperatively. In addition, vestibular evoked myogenic potentials were evoked intraoperatively to investigate possible interferences of the electrically stimulated cochlear implant electrode (eVEMP) with vestibular receptor cells of the saccule in more detail. After cochlear implantation, the saccular function was impaired in the majority of the patients. However, eVEMPs could be recorded intraoperatively in all patients by intracochlear, high-level electrical stimulation via the cochlear implant electrode. In essence, acute, short-term dizziness after cochlear implantation seems to result primarily from a transient vestibular deficit of various origins. In contrast to this, chronic, persisting dizziness after cochlear implant surgery is largely based on a dysfunction of the saccular macula which is an integral component of the otolith system. This saccular impairment is induced most likely by the insertion trauma of the cochlear implant electrode when advancing it into the inner ear. A possible coactivation of the inferior vestibular nerve by the electrical stimulation might play an additional role in the pathogenesis of the persisting postsurgical dizziness.

Keywords:
Cochlear implant, Vestibular function, Dizziness
1.
Baloh RW, Sakala SM, Yee RD: Quantitative vestibular testing. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1984;92:145–150.
2.
Basta D, Todt I, Eisenschenk A, Ernst A: Vestibular evoked myogenic potentials induced by intraoperative electrical stimulation of the human inferior vestibular nerve. Hear Res 2005a;204:111–114.
3.
Basta D, Todt I, Ernst A: Normative data for P1/N1-latencies of vestibular evoked myogenic potentials induced by air- or bone-conducted tone bursts. Clin Neurophysiol 2005b;116:2216–2219.
4.
Brey RH, Facer GW, Trine MB, Lynn SG, Peterson AM, Suman VJ: Vestibular effects associated with implantation of a multiple channel cochlear prosthesis. Am J Otol 1995;16:424–430.
5.
Buchmann CA, Joy J, Hodges A, Telischi FF, Balkany TJ: Vestibular effects of cochlear implantation. Laryngoscope 2004;114:1–22.
6.
Colebatch JG, Halmagyi GM: Vestibular evoked potentials in human neck muscles before and after unilateral vestibular deafferentation. Neurology 1992;42:1635–1636.
7.
Colebatch JG, Halmagyi GM, Skuse NF: Myogenic potentials generated by a click-evoked vestibulocollic reflex. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1994;57:190–197.
8.
Di Nardo W, Cantore I, Cianfrone F, Melillo P, Rigante M, Paludetti G: Residual hearing thresholds in cochlear implantation and reimplantation. Audiol Neurotol 2007;12:165–169.
9.
Ernst A, Basta D, Seidl RO, Todt I, Scherer H, Clake A: Management of posttraumatic vertigo. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2005;132:554–558.
10.
Fina M, Skinner M, Goebel JA, Picccirillo J, Neely JG, Black O: Vestibular dysfunction after cochlear implantation. Otol Neurotol 2003;24:234–242.
11.
Gstoettner WK, Helbig S, Maier N, Kiefer J, Radeloff A, Adunka OF: Ipsilateral electric acoustic stimulation of the auditory system: results of long-term hearing preservation. Audiol Neurootol 2006;11:49–56.
12.
Halmagyi GM, Aw ST, Cremer PD, Todd MJ, Curthoys IS: The human vertical vestibuloocular reflex in response to high-acceleration stimulation after unilateral vestibular neurectomy. Ann NY Acad Sci 1992;656:732–738.
13.
Halmagyi GM, Curthoys IS: A clinical sign of canal paresis. Arch Neurol 1988;45:737–739.
14.
Huygen PL, van den Broek P, Spies TH, Mens LH, Admiraal RJ: Does intracochlear implantation jeopardize vestibular function? Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1994;103:609–614.
15.
Ito J: Influence of the multichannel cochlear implant on vestibular function. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1998;118:900–902.
16.
Jacobson GP, Newman CW: The development of the dizziness handicap inventory (DHI). Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1990;116:424–427.
17.
Jacobson GP, Newman CW, Hunter I, Balzer GK: Balance function test correlates of the DHI. J Am Acad Audiol 1991;2:253–360.
18.
Jin Y, Nakamura M, Shinjo Y, Kaga K: Vestibular-evoked myogenic potentials in cochlear implant children. Acta Otolaryngol 2006;126:164–169.
19.
Jongkees LB, Maas J, Philipszoon A: Clinical electronystagmography: a detailed study of electronystagmography in 341 patients. Pract Otorhinolaryngol 1962;24:65–93.
20.
Klenzner T, Neumann M, Aschendorff A, Laszig R: Caloric stimulation of the vestibular organ after cochlear implant surgery. Laryngorhinootol 2004;83:659–664.
21.
Kusuma S, Liou S, Haynes DS: Disequilibrium after cochlear implantation caused by a perilymphatic fistula. Laryngoscope 2005;115:25–26.
22.
Limb CJ, Francis HF, Lustig LR, Niparko JK, Jammal H: Benign positional vertigo after cochlear implantation. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2005;132:741–745.
23.
McCue MP, Guinan JJ: Acoustically responsive fibers in the vestibular nerve of the cat. J Neurosci 1994;14:6058–6070.
24.
Smullen JL, Polak M, Hodges AV, Payne SB, Telischi FF, Balkany TJ: Facial nerve stimulation after cochlear implantation. Laryngoscope 2005;115:977–982.
25.
Steenerson RL, Cronin GW, Gary LB: Vertigo after cochlear implantation. Otol Neurotol 2001;22:842–843.
26.
Strutz J, Mann W: Praxis der HNO-Heilkunde, Kopf- und Halschirurgie. Stuttgart, Thieme, 2000.
27.
Tien HC, Linthicum FH Jr: Histopathologic changes in the vestibule after cochlear implantation. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2002;127:260–264.
28.
Todt I, Basta D, Eisenschenk A, Ernst A: The ‘pull-back’ technique for Nucleus 24 perimodiolar electrode insertion. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2005;132:751–754.
29.
Vibert D, Hausler R, Kompis M, Vischer M: Vestibular function in patients with cochlear implantation. Acta Otolaryngol Suppl 2001;545:29–34.
30.
Westhofen M: Subjective vertical during static tilt: a method of clinical testing of otolith organs; in Haid CT (ed): Vestibular Diagnosis and Neuro-Otosurgical Management of Skull Base. Gräfelfing, Demeter Publications, 1991, pp 109–113.
© 2008 S. Karger AG, Basel
2008
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.