Recent studies investigating whether the primary auditory cortex (PAC) is involved in silent lipreading gave inconsistent results. We used positron emission tomography to identify which areas in the temporal lobe process visible speech, with a focus on the PAC. Subjects were tested on lipreading numbers and only the best lipreaders were included in the study (n = 18; 9 female, 9 male). Each subject was scanned while either watching a movie with a speaker silently articulating numbers (lipreading condition) or watching a static image of the same speaker (baseline condition). Subjects were instructed to repeat internally the number seen or the number ‘1’. Compared to the baseline condition, silent lipreading activated temporal areas in both hemispheres with the largest activation clusters in the left hemisphere. When the whole group was examined, no activation in the PAC was found. But when investigating the two sexes separately, the female group demonstrated activation of the left PAC. There was no significant activation in the right female PAC or in the left and right male PAC. Since both groups had similar performances in lipreading, differential activity in the PAC has no effect on lipreading scores. These results may explain previous inconsistent results where no differentiation for sex was made.

Keywords:
Human primary auditory cortex, Visible speech processing, Gender, Neuroimaging, Positron emission tomography
1.
Bernstein LE, Auer ET, Moore JK, Ponton CW, Don M, Singh M: Visual speech perception without primary auditory cortex activation. Neuroreport 2002;13:311–315.
2.
Besle J, Fort A, Delpuech C, Giard MH: Bimodal speech: early suppressive visual effects in human auditory cortex. Eur J Neurosci 2004;20:2225–2234.
3.
Brosch M, Selezneva E, Scheich H: Nonauditory events of a behavioral procedure activate auditory cortex of highly trained monkeys. J Neurosci 2005;25:6797–6806.
4.
Calvert GA, Bullmore ET, Brammer MJ, Campbell R, Williams SC, McGuire PK, Woodruff PW, Iversen SD, David AS: Activation of auditory cortex during silent lipreading. Science 1997;276:593–596.
5.
Calvert GA, Campbell R: Reading speech from still and moving faces: the neural substrates of visible speech. J Cogn Neurosci 2003;15:57–70.
6.
Campbell R: Everyday speechreading: understanding seen speech action. Scand J Psychol 1998a;39:163–167.
7.
Campbell R: Speechreading: advances in understanding its cortical bases and implications for deafness and speech rehabilitation. Scand Audiol 1998b;49(suppl):80–86.
8.
Campbell R, de Gelder B, De Haan E: The lateralization of lip-reading: a second look. Neuropsychologia 1996;34:1235–1240.
9.
Campbell R, MacSweeney M, Surguladze S, Calvert G, McGuire P, Suckling J, Brammer MJ, David AS: Cortical substrates for the perception of face actions: an fMRI study of the specificity of activation for seen speech and for meaningless lower-face acts (gurning). Brain Res Cogn Brain Res 2001;12:233–243.
10.
Cohen LG, Celnik P, Pascual-Leone A, Corwell B, Falz L, Dambrosia J, Honda M, Sadato N, Gerloff C, Catala MD, Hallett M: Functional relevance of cross-modal plasticity in blind humans. Nature 1997;389:180–183.
11.
Eickhoff SB, Stephan KE, Mohlberg H, Grefkes C, Fink GR, Amunts K, Zilles K: A new SPM toolbox for combining probabilistic cytoarchitectonic maps and functional imaging data. Neuroimage 2005;25:1325–1335.
12.
Erber NP: Auditory-visual perception of speech. J Speech Hear Disord 1975;40:481–492.
13.
Finney EM, Fine I, Dobkins KR: Visual stimuli activate auditory cortex in the deaf. Nat Neurosci 2001;4:1171–1173.
14.
Friston KJ, Ashburner J, Frith CD, Poline JB, Heather JD, Frackowiak RSJ: Spatial registration and normalization of images. Hum Brain Mapp 1995;3:165–189.
15.
Genovese CR, Lazar NA, Nichols T: Thresholding of statistical maps in functional neuroimaging using the false discovery rate. Neuroimage 2002;15:870–878.
16.
Ghazanfar AA, Maier JX, Hoffman KL, Logothetis NK: Multisensory integration of dynamic faces and voices in rhesus monkey auditory cortex. J Neurosci 2005;25:5004– 5012.
17.
Hunter MD, Eickhoff SB, Miller TW, Farrow TF, Wilkinson ID, Woodruff PW: Neural activity in speech-sensitive auditory cortex during silence. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2006;103:189–194.
18.
Irwin JR, Whalen DH, Fowler CA: A sex difference in visual influence on heard speech. Percept Psychophys 2006;68:582–592.
19.
Jancke L, Shah NJ: Hearing syllables by seeing visual stimuli. Eur J Neurosci 2004;19:2603–2608.
20.
Kaas JH, Hackett TA: Subdivisions of auditory cortex and levels of processing in primates. Audiol Neurootol 1998;3:73–85.
21.
Kimura D: Sex and Cognition. London, MIT Press, 1999.
22.
Leonard CM, Puranik C, Kuldau JM, Lombardino LJ: Normal variation in the frequency and location of human auditory cortex landmarks Heschl’s gyrus: where is it? Cereb Cortex 1998;8:397–406.
23.
Ludman CN, Summerfield AQ, Hall D, Elliott M, Foster J, Hykin JL, Bowtell R, Morris PG: Lip-reading ability and patterns of cortical activation studied using fMRI. Br J Audiol 2000;34:225–230.
24.
MacSweeney M, Amaro E, Calvert GA, Campbell R, David AS, McGuire P, Williams SC, Woll B, Brammer MJ: Silent speechreading in the absence of scanner noise: an event-related fMRI study. Neuroreport 2000;11:1729–1733.
25.
Mai JK, Assheuer J, Paxinos G: Atlas of the Human Brain. San Diego, Academic Press, 1997.
26.
McGurk H, MacDonald J: Hearing lips and seeing voices. Nature 1976;264:746–748.
27.
Morosan P, Rademacher J, Schleicher A, Amunts K, Schormann T, Zilles K: Human primary auditory cortex: cytoarchitectonic subdivisions and mapping into a spatial reference system. Neuroimage 2001;13:684–701.
28.
Mottonen R, Krause CM, Tiippana K, Sams M: Processing of changes in visual speech in the human auditory cortex. Brain Res Cogn Brain Res 2002;13:417–425.
29.
Nishitani N, Hari R: Viewing lip forms: cortical dynamics. Neuron 2002;36:1211–1220.
30.
Ojanen V, Mottonen R, Pekkola J, Jaaskelainen IP, Joensuu R, Autti T, Sams M: Processing of audiovisual speech in Broca’s area. Neuroimage 2005;25:333–338.
31.
Olson IR, Gatenby JC, Gore JC: A comparison of bound and unbound audio-visual information processing in the human cerebral cortex. Brain Res Cogn Brain Res 2002;14:129–138.
32.
Paulesu E, Perani D, Blasi V, Silani G, Borghese AN, De Giovanni U, Sensolo S, Fazio F: A functional-anatomical model for lip-reading. J Neurophysiol 2003;90:2005–2013.
33.
Pekkola J, Ojanen V, Autti T, Jaaskelainen IP, Mottonen R, Tarkiainen A, Sams M: Primary auditory cortex activation by visual speech: an fMRI study at 3 T. Neuroreport 2005;16:125–128.
34.
Penhune VB, Zatorre RJ, MacDonald JD, Evans AC: Interhemispheric anatomical differences in human primary auditory cortex: probabilistic mapping and volume measurement from magnetic resonance scans. Cereb Cortex 1996;6:661–672.
35.
Rademacher J, Morosan P, Schleicher A, Freund HJ, Zilles K: Human primary auditory cortex in women and men. Neuroreport 2001a;12:1561–1565.
36.
Rademacher J, Morosan P, Schormann T, Schleicher A, Werner C, Freund HJ, Zilles K: Probabilistic mapping and volume measurement of human primary auditory cortex. Neuroimage 2001b;13:669–683.
37.
Reinders AA, Willemsen AT, Georgiadis JR, Hovius M, Paans AM, den Boer JA: Interscan displacement-induced variance in PET activation data is excluded by a scan-specific attenuation correction. Neuroimage 2002;17:1844–1853.
38.
Rhodes G: Lateralized processes in face recognition. Br J Psychol 1985;76:249–271.
39.
Ruytjens L, Albers F, van Dijk P, Wit H, Willemsen A: Neural responses to lipreading in normal hearing male and female subjects. Eur J Neurosci 2006;24:1835–1844.
40.
Saint-Amour D, De Sanctis P, Molholm S, Ritter W, Foxe JJ: Seeing voices: high-density electrical mapping and source-analysis of the multisensory mismatch negativity evoked during the McGurk illusion. Neuropsychologia 2007;45:587–597.
41.
Sams M, Aulanko R, Hamalainen M, Hari R, Lounasmaa OV, Lu ST, Simola J: Seeing speech: visual information from lip movements modifies activity in the human auditory cortex. Neurosci Lett 1991;127:141–145.
42.
Sekiyama K, Kanno I, Miura S, Sugita Y: Auditory-visual speech perception examined by fMRI and PET. Neurosci Res 2003;47:277–287.
43.
Smeele PMT, Massaro DW, Cohen MM, Sittig AC: Laterality in visual speech perception. J Exp Psychol-Hum Percept Perform 1998;24:1232–1242.
44.
Summerfield Q: Lipreading and audio-visual speech perception. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 1992;335:71–78.
45.
Talairach J, Tournoux P: Co-Planar Stereotaxic Atlas of the Human Brain. New York, Thieme, 1988.
46.
Tervaniemi M, Hugdahl K: Lateralization of auditory-cortex functions. Brain Res Brain Res Rev 2003;43:231–246.
47.
Tzourio-Mazoyer N, Landeau B, Papathanassiou D, Crivello F, Etard O, Delcroix N, Mazoyer B, Joliot M: Automated anatomical labeling of activations in SPM using a macroscopic anatomical parcellation of the MNI MRI single-subject brain. Neuroimage 2002;15:273–289.
48.
Watson CS, Qiu WW, Chamberlain MM, Li X: Auditory and visual speech perception: confirmation of a modality-independent source of individual differences in speech recognition. J Acoust Soc Am 1996;100:1153–1162.
49.
Weeks R, Horwitz B, Aziz-Sultan A, Tian B, Wessinger CM, Cohen LG, Hallett M, Rauschecker JP: A positron emission tomographic study of auditory localization in the congenitally blind. J Neurosci 2000;20:2664–2672.
© 2007 S. Karger AG, Basel
2007
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.