Hearing impairment has been associated with cognitive deficits. It is not yet clear whether cochlear implants enable children to reduce or overcome these deficits. This study examined whether hearing impaired children with cochlear implants differed from hearing impaired children without cochlear implants or from hearing children. The three age-matched groups were compared on a non-verbal measure of cognition, the Leiter International Performance Scale-Revised (LIPS-R), and a measure of behaviour, the Child Behaviour Checklist (CBCL). Apart from their scores on the Attention Sustained Subtest of the LIPS-R, the performance of the implanted group and the hearing group closely corresponded, while the hearing impaired children without cochlear implants performed below the level achieved by both these groups. There were no differences between any groups on the CBCL. It was concluded that hearing impaired children with cochlear implants were able to perform at the same non-verbal cognitive level as hearing children.

1.
Achenbach TM: Integrative Guide for the 1991 CBCL/4–18, YSR and TRF Profiles. Burlington, University of Vermont, Department of Psychiatry, 1991.
2.
Achenbach TM: Manual for the Child Behaviour Checklist/2–3 and 1992 Profile. Burlington, University of Vermont, Department of Psychiatry, 1992.
3.
Anderson RJ, Sisco FH: Standardization of the WISC-R performance scale for deaf children. Washington, Office of Demographic Studies Publication Series T, No 1, Gallaudet College, 1977.
4.
Athanasiou MS: Current nonverbal assessment instruments: A comparison of psychometric integrity and test fairness. J Psychoeduc Assess 2000;18:211–229.
5.
Braden JP: The factorial similarity of the WISC-R performance scale in deaf and hearing samples. Pers Individ Differ 1984;5:403–409.
6.
Braden JP: Do deaf persons have a characteristic psychometric profile on the Wechsler performance scales? J Psychoeduc Assess 1990;8:518–526.
7.
Burkholder RA, Pisoni DB: Speech timing and working memory in profoundly deaf children after cochlear implantation. J Exp Child Psychol 2003;85:63–88.
8.
Clark-Carter D: Doing Quantitative Psychological Research: From Design to Report. Hove, Psychology Press, 1997.
9.
Cleary M, Pisoni D, Geers AE: Some measures of verbal and spatial working memory in eight- and nine-year-old hearing-impaired children with cochlear implants. Ear Hear 2001;22:395–411.
10.
Conrad R, Weiskrantz BC: On the cognitive ability of deaf children with deaf parents. Am Ann Deaf 1981;126:995–1003.
11.
Giraud AL, Price CJ, Graham JM, Frackowiak RS: Functional plasticity of language-related brain areas after cochlear implantation. Brain 2001;124:1307–1316.
12.
Gregory P: Deaf Children and Their Families: The Handicap of Deafness. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1996.
13.
Hindley P, Hill P, McGuigan S, Kitson N: Psychiatric disorder in deaf and hearing impaired children and young people: A prevalence study. J Child Psychol Psychiatry 1994;35:917–934.
14.
Hindley P, Kroll L: Theoretical and epidemiological aspects of attention deficit and overactivity in deaf children. J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ 1998;3:64–72.
15.
Korkman M, Kirk U, Kemp S: Nepsy Manual. A Developmental Neuropsychological Assessment. San Antonio, The Psychological Corporation, 1998.
16.
LHO: London Health Observatory, 21 March 2001. Mental health: Child and Adolescent. http://www.lho.org.uk/hil/mh1_ca.htm2001.
17.
Martin DS: Cognitive development and deafness; in Nowell RC, Marshak LE (eds): Understanding Deafness and the Rehabilitation Process. London, Allyn & Bacon, 1994, pp 35–49.
18.
Miller MS: Experimental use of signed presentations of the verbal scale of the WISC-R with profoundly deaf children: A preliminary report; in Martin DS (ed): Cognition, Education and Deafness: Directions for Research and Instruction. Washington, Gallaudet College Press, 1985, pp 134–136.
19.
20.
Pinter R, Eisenson J, Stanton: The Psychology of the Physically Disabled. New York, Crofts & Company, 1941.
21.
Pisoni DB, Cleary M: Measures of working memory span and verbal rehearsal speed in deaf children after cochlear implantation. Ear Hear 2003;24(suppl 1):106–120.
22.
Pisoni DB, Geers AE: Working memory in deaf children with cochlear implants: Correlations between digit span and measures of spoken language processing. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 2000;185(suppl):92–93.
23.
Quittner AL, Smith LB, Osberger MJ, Mitchell TV, Katz, DB: The impact of audition on the development of visual attention. Psychol Sci 1994;5:347–353.
24.
Roid GH, Miller LJ: Leiter International Performance Scale-Revised. Wood Dale, Stoelting Co., 1997a.
25.
Roid GH, Miller LJ: Leiter International Performance Scale-Revised: Examiner’s Manual; in Roid GH, Miller LJ: Leiter International Performance Scale-Revised. Wood Dale, Stoelting Co., 1997b.
26.
Sisco F, Anderson RJ: Deaf children’s performance on the WISC-R relative to hearing status of parents and child-rearing experiences. Am Ann Deaf 1980;125:923–930.
27.
SOC: Standard Occupational Classification 2000. http://www.statistics.gov.uk/methods_quality/ns_sec/soc2000.asp.
28.
Spencer PE, Deyo DA: Cognitive and social aspects of deaf children’s play; in Marschark M, Clark MD (eds): Psychological Perspectives on Deafness. Hillsdale, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1993, pp 65–91.
29.
Stiles J: Neural plasticity and cognitive development. Dev Neuropsychol 2000;18:237–272.
30.
Sullivan PM: Administration and modifications of the WISC-R performance scale with different categories of children. Am Ann Deaf 1982;127:780–788.
31.
Tharpe AM, Ashmead DH, Rothpletz AM: Visual attention in children with normal hearing, children with hearing aids, and children with cochlear implants. J Speech Lang Hear Res 2002;45:403–413.
32.
Tiber N: A psychological evaluation of cochlear implants in children. Ear Hear 1985;6(suppl):48–51.
33.
Vostantis P, Hayes M, Du Feu M, Warren J: Detection of behavioural and emotional problems in deaf children and adolescents: Comparison of two rating scales. Child Care Health Dev 1997;23:233–246.
34.
Vygotsky L: Thought and Language. Cambridge, MIT Press, 1962.
35.
Wechsler D: Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children-Revised. New York, The Psychological Corporation, 1974.
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.