In young adults with normal hearing, the right ear is more sensitive than the left to simple sounds (peripheral right-ear advantage) and to processing complex sounds such as speech (central right-ear advantage). In the present investigation, the effects of hearing loss and aging on this auditory asymmetry were examined at both peripheral and central levels. Audiograms and transient evoked otoacoustic emission (TEOAE) and distortion product otoacoustic emission amplitudes were used to assess cochlear function. The contralateral suppression of TEOAEs was measured to assess the medial olivocochlear efferent system. The Hearing in Noise Test (HINT; binaural speech) was conducted to assess higher central auditory function. A group of aged subjects with normal hearing (flat audiograms) were compared to a group of aged subjects with sloping audiograms (presbycusis). At the cochlear (peripheral) level, the normal hearing group showed significantly higher otoacoustic emission amplitudes for the right ear compared to the left ear, which is consistent with the right-ear dominance normally seen in young adults. However, this finding was reversed in the presbycusic group that showed higher left-ear emission amplitudes. At the brainstem level, the amplitudes of TEOAE contralateral suppression were small and no significant difference was found between the right and left ears in both groups. On the contrary, HINT results showed a continuous dominance of the right ear (left hemisphere) in both groups, which was consistent with previous reports showing that the right hemisphere is more affected by age than the left hemisphere.

Keywords:
Right-ear advantage, Auditory asymmetry, Presbycusis, Hearing loss, Otoacoustic emissions, Transient evoked otoacoustic emissions, Contralateral suppression, Distortion product otoacoustic emissions, Auditory efferents, Hearing in Noise Test
1.
Alden JD, Harrison DW, Snyder KA, Everhart DE: Age differences in intention to left and right hemispace using a dichotic listening paradigm. Neuropsychiatry Neuropsychol Behav Neurol 1997;10:239–242.
2.
Bilger RC, Matthies ML, Hammel DR, Demorest ME: Genetic implications of gender differences in the prevalence of spontaneous otoacoustic emissions. J Speech Hear Res 1990;33:418–432.
3.
Brown S, Nicholls MER: Hemispheric asymmetries for the temporal resolution of brief auditory stimuli. Percept Psychophys 1997;59:442–447.
4.
Carrasco VN, Prazma J, Faber JE, Triana RJ, Pillsbury HC: Cochlear microcirculation. Acta Otolaryngol (Stockh) 1990;116:411–417.
5.
Chi JG, Dooling EC, Gilles FH: Left-right asymmetries of the temporal speech areas of the human fetus. Arch Neurol 1977;34:346–348.
6.
Chung DY, Mason K, Gannon RP, Wilson GN: The ear effect as a function of age and hearing loss. J Acoust Soc Am 1983;73:1277–1282.
7.
Ehret G: Left hemisphere advantage in the mouse brain for recognizing ultrasonic communication calls. Nature 1987;325:249–251.
8.
Frisina RD: Anatomical and neurochemical bases of presbycusis; in Hof PR, Mobbs CV (eds): Functional Neurobiology of Aging. San Diego, Academic Press, 2001a, chapter 37, pp 531–547.
9.
Frisina RD: Possible neurochemical and neuroanatomical bases of age-related hearing loss – Presbycusis. Sem Hear Innov Aging Audit Res 2001b;22:213–225.
10.
Frisina DR, Frisina RD: Speech recognition in noise and presbycusis: Relations to possible neural mechanisms. Hear Res 1997;106:95–104.
11.
Frisina RD, Walton JP: Aging of the mouse central auditory system; in Willott JP (ed): Handbook of Mouse Auditory Research: From Behavior to Molecular Biology. New York, CRC Press, 2001, chapter 24, pp 339–379.
12.
Galaburda AM, Sanides F, Geschwind N: Human brain: Cytoarchitectonic left-right brain asymmetries in the temporal speech region. Arch Neurol 1978;35:812–817.
13.
Gelfand SA, Hoffman S, Waltzman SB, Piper N: Dichotic CV recognition at various interaural temporal onset asynchronies: Effect of age. J Acoust Soc Am 1980;68:1258–1261.
14.
Geschwind N, Levitsky W: Human brain: Left-right asymmetries in temporal speech region. Science 1968;161:186–187.
15.
Gordon-Salant S, Fitzgibbons PJ: Temporal factors and speech recognition performance in young and elderly listeners. J Speech Hear Res 1993;36:1276–1285.
16.
Greenwald RR, Jerger J: Aging affects hemispheric asymmetry on a competing speech task. J Am Acad Audiol 2001;12:167–173.
17.
Hatta T, Yamamoto M, Mito H: Functional hemispheric differences in auditory and tactile recognition in aged people. Jap J Psychol 1984;54:358–363.
18.
Ison JR, Walton JP, Frisina RD, O’Neill WE: Elicitation and inhibition of the startle reflex by acoustic transients: Studies of age-related changes in temporal processing; in Willott JP (ed): Handbook of Mouse Auditory Research: From Behavior to Molecular Biology. New York, CRC Press, 2001, chapter 35, pp 381–387.
19.
Jacobson M, Kim S, Romney J, Zhu X, Frisina RD: Contralateral suppression of distortion-product otoacoustic emissions declines with age: A comparison of findings in CBA mice with human listeners. Laryngoscope 2003;113:1707–1713.
20.
Jerger J: Functional asymmetries in the auditory system. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl 1997;168:23–30.
21.
Jerger J, Chmiel R, Allen J, Wilson A: Effects of age and gender on dichotic sentence identification. Ear Hear 1994;15:274–286.
22.
Kawase T, Liberman MC: Antimasking effects of the olivocochlear reflex. 1. Enhancement of compound action potentials to masked tones. J Neurophysiol 1993;70:2519–2532.
23.
Kei J, McPherson B, Smyth V, Latham S, Loscher J: Transient evoked otoacoustic emissions in infants: Effects of gender, ear asymmetry and activity status. Audiology 1997;36:61–71.
24.
Keogh T, Kei J, Driscoll C, Smyth V: Distortion-product otoacoustic emissions in schoolchildren: Effects of ear asymmetry, handedness, and gender. J Am Acad Audiol 2001;12:506–513.
25.
Kim S, Frisina DR, Frisina RD: Effects of age on contralateral suppression of distortion product otoacoustic emissions in human listeners with normal hearing. Audiol Neurootol 2002;7:348–357.
26.
Kimura RS, Perlman HB: Arterial obstruction of the labyrinth. 1. Cochlear changes. 2. Vestibular changes. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1958;67:5–40.
27.
Khalfa S, Morlet T, Micheyl C, Morgon A, Collet L: Evidence of peripheral hearing asymmetry in humans: Clinical implications. Acta Otolaryngol (Stockh) 1997;117:192–196.
28.
Khalfa S, Micheyl C, Veuillet E, Collet L: Peripheral auditory lateralization assessment using TEOAEs. Hear Res 1998;121:29–34.
29.
Laurikainen EA, Kim D, Didier A, et al: Stellate ganglion drives sympathetic regulation of cochlear blood flow. Hear Res 1993;64:199–204.
30.
Levitt H: Transformed up-down methods in psychoacoustics. J Acoust Soc Am 1971;49:476–477.
31.
May B, Moody DB, Stebbins WC: Categorical perception of conspecific communication sounds by Japanese macaques, Macaca fuscata. JAcoust Soc Am 1989;85:837–847.
32.
McFadden D: A speculation about the parallel ear asymmetries and sex differences in hearing sensitivity and otoacoustic emissions. Hear Res 1993;68:143–151.
33.
Micheyl C, Collet L: Involvement of medial olivocochlear system in the detection of tones in noise. J Acoust Soc Am 1996;99:1604–1610.
34.
Miller JM, Hultcrantz E, Short S, Nuttall AL: Pharmacological effects on cochlear blood flow measured with the laser Doppler technique. Scand Audiol Suppl 1986;26:11–20.
35.
Morlet T, Goforth L, Hood LJ, Ferber C, Duclaux R, Berlin CI: Development of human cochlear active mechanism asymmetry: Involvement of the medial olivocochlear system? Hear Res 1999;134:153–162.
36.
Nakashima T, Miller JM, Nuttall AL: Autoregulation of cochlear blood flow in young and aged mice. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 1995;252:308–311.
37.
Nebes RD, Madden DJ, Berg WD: The effect of age on hemispheric asymmetry in visual and auditory identification. Exp Aging Res 1983;9:87–91.
38.
Newmark M, Merlob P, Bresloff I, Olsha M, Attias J: Click evoked otoacoustic emissions: Inter-aural and gender differences in newborns. J Basic Clin Physiol Pharmacol 1997;8:133–139.
39.
O’Connor KN, Roitblat HL, Bever TG: Auditory sequence complexity and hemispheric asymmetry of function in rats; in Roitblat HL, Harman LM, Nachtigal PE (eds): Language and Communication: Comparative perspectives. Hillsdale, Erlbaum, 1992.
40.
Ohlsen KA, Baldwin DL, Nuttall AL, Miller JM: Influence of topically applied adrenergic agents on cochlear blood flow. Circ Res 1991;69:509–518.
41.
Perlman HB, Kimura RS, Fernandez C: Experiments on temporary obstruction of the internal auditory artery. Laryngoscope 1959;69:591–613.
42.
Peterson MR, Beecher MD, Zoloth SR, Green S, Marler PR, Moody DB, Stebbins WC: Neural lateralization of vocalizations by Japanese macaques: Communicative significance is more important than acoustic structure. Behav Neurosci 1984;98:779–790.
43.
Peterson MR, Beecher MD, Zoloth SR, Moody DB, Stebbins WC: Neural lateralization of species-specific vocalizations by Japanese macaques (Macaca fuscata). Science 1978;202:325–327.
44.
Pirila T: Left-right asymmetry in the human response to experimental noise exposure. Acta Otolaryngol (Stockh) 1991;111:861–866.
45.
Quirk WS, Wright JW, Dengerink HA, Miller JM: Angiotensin II-induced changes in cochlear blood flow and blood pressure in normotensive and spontaneously hypertensive rats. Hear Res 1988;33:129–136.
46.
Ren T, Avinash GB, Nuttall AL, Miller JM, Laurikainen EA, Quirk WS: Dynamic response of cochlear blood flow to occlusion of the anterior inferior cerebellar artery in guinea pig. J Appl Physiol 1994;76:212–217.
47.
Ren T, Laurikainen E, Quirk WS, Miller JM, Nuttall AL: Effects of electrical stimulation of the superior cervical ganglion on cochlear blood flow in the guinea pig. Acta Otolaryngol 1993a;113:146–151.
48.
Ren T, Laurikainen E, Quirk WS, Miller JM, Nuttall AL: Effects of intraneural sympathetic stimulation of the stellate ganglion on the bilateral cochlear blood flow in guinea pig. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1993b;102:378–384.
49.
Short SQ, Goodwin PC, Kaplan JN, Miller JM: Measuring cochlear blood flow by laser Doppler spectroscopy. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1985;93:786–793.
50.
Sillman JS, Masta RI, LaRouere MJ, Nuttall AL, Miller JM: Electrically stimulated increases in cochlear blood flow. 2. Evidence of neural medication. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1989;101:362–374.
51.
Snell KB, Frisina DR: Relationship among age-related differences in gap detection and word recognition. J Acoust Soc Am 2000;107:1615–1626.
52.
Suzuki T, Ren T, Nuttall AL, Miller JM: Age-related changes in cochlear blood flow response to occlusion of anterior inferior cerebellar artery in mice. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1998;107:648–653.
53.
Telisci FF, Widick MP, Stagner BB, Martin GK, Lonsbury-Martin BL: Effects of vascular compromise on rabbit DPOAEs: Implications for cerebellopontine angle surgery. Assoc Res Otolaryngol Abstr 1994;17:46.
54.
Widick MP, Telischi FF, Lonsbury-Martin BL, Stagner BB: Early effects of cerebellopontine angle compression on rabbit distortion-product otoacoustic emissions: A model for monitoring cochlear function during acoustic neuroma surgery. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1994;111:407–416.
55.
Wright JW, Dengerink HA, Miller JM, Goodwin PC: Potential role of angiotensin II in noise-induced increases in inner ear blood flow. Hear Res 1985;17:41–46.
56.
Zettel ML, Frisina RD, Haider S, O’Neill WE: Age-related changes in the immunoreactivity of calbindin D28K and calretinin in the inferior colliculus of the CBA/J and C57/6J mouse. J Comp Neurol 1997;386:92–110.
57.
Zettel ML, O’Neill WE, Trang TT, Frisina RD: Early bilateral deafening prevents calretinin up-regulation in the dorsal cortex of the inferior colliculus of aged CBA/CaJ mice. Hear Res 2001;158:131–138.
58.
Zettel ML, Trang TT, O’Neill WE, Frisina RD: Activity-dependent age-related regulation of calcium-binding proteins in the mouse dorsal cochlear nucleus. Hear Res 2003;183:57–66.
© 2005 S. Karger AG, Basel
2004
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.