Adult quail were exposed one, two or three times to an intense octave band noise. Birds were sacrificed 0 or 14 days after the last exposure and their ears processed for scanning electron microscopy (SEM). SEM observations demonstrated a patch lesion in every ear at 0 and 14 days after exposure. In the single-exposed ear immediately after noise, the lesion lacked any tectorial membrane (TM). At 14 days of recovery, the site of injury was covered by a partially regenerated TM (referred to as the honeycomb). However, the patterns of TM damage and repair varied among the twice- and thrice-exposed papillae. At 0 days after exposure, the multiple-exposed ear displayed a lesion with two segments. In one portion the TM was missing, and in the other portion the TM was present as one or two honeycomb layers. Fourteen days later, a new honeycomb was observed underneath the remaining honeycomb. These results suggest that the quail is able to repeatedly repair its TM following multiple noise exposures.

Keywords:
Acoustic overstimulation, Damage, Regeneration, Basilar papilla
This content is only available via PDF.
© 1996 S. Karger AG, Basel
1996
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.