Background/Aims: Physical exhaustion is not always peripheral, and it is the brain that causes the sensation of fatigue either due to decrease of metabolic resources or due to central activation process that regulates attention and performance. This study was undertaken to observe the variations in event-related potentials (ERPs) and cognitive performance after an exhausting physical exercise. Methods: A total of 60 healthy young adult subjects were included in the study. The study was conducted in 2 phases with at least a week gap between the phases. The participants answered a Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory (MFI-20) questionnaire before and after trials in each phase to measure the induced physical exhaustion. In phase I (control trial), the ERP data were processed using P300, Standard auditory “oddball paradigm,” on computerized evoked potential recorder (RMS EMG MK-2) using 10/20 system to know the engagement of attention after which participants were given to perform cognitive tasks such as “Stroop Test, Trial Making Test and Mini Mental State Examination.” In Phase II (exercise trial), the participants were instructed to cycle as hard as they could, till they could not continue anymore, which was followed by recording of P300-evoked potentials and performance of cognitive tasks as in Phase I. Paired t test was used to compare between any dependent variables. Results: Fatigue-related subjective measures (MFI-20) showed that both mental and physical exhaustion were significantly greater in the exercise-involved cognitive trial than in the control trial. Lower P300 latencies reflect faster reaction time; however, their response accuracies were poorer resulting in poorer cognitive performances. Participants subjected to control trial performed better in terms of higher percentage accuracy but with slow reaction time. Conclusion: The participants experienced more fatigue physically and mentally during the exercise that involved cognitive tasks. An apparent decrease in attention based on decreased percentage accuracy of response was evident, implying that fatigue, performance, and attention are interdependent.

Keywords:
Event related potential, Cognitive performance, Exhaustion, Stroop test
1.
Ishii A, Tanaka M, Watanabe Y: Neural mechanisms of mental fatigue. Rev Neurosci 2014; 25: 469–479.
2.
Bartlett FC: Fatigue following highly skilled work, Proc. R Soc 1943; 131: 247–257.
3.
Watanabe Y: Preface and mini-review: fatigue science for human health in: Watanabe Y, Evengård B, Natelson BH, et al (eds): Fatigue Science for Human Health (ed 1). New York, Springer, 2008, pp 5–11.
4.
Wessely S: The epidemiology of chronic fatigue syndrome. Epidemiol Rev 1995; 17: 139–151
5.
Chaudhuri A, Behan PO: Fatigue in neurological disorders. Lancet 2004; 363: 978–988.
6.
Brown ID: Driver fatigue. Hum Factors 1994; 36: 298–314.
7.
Dosher BA, Lu ZL: Mechanisms of perceptual attention in precuing of location. Vision Res 2000; 40: 1269–1292.
8.
Murray SO, Wojciulik E: Attention increases neural selectivity in the human lateral occipital complex. Nat Neurosci 2004; 7: 70–74.
9.
Posner MI, Snyder CR, Davidson BJ: Attention and the detection of signals. J Exp Psychol 1980; 109: 160–174.
10.
Sellers EW, Donchin E: A P300-based brain-computer interface: initial tests by ALS patients. Clin Neurophysiol 2006; 117: 538–548.
11.
Colcombe S, Kramer AF: Fitness effects on the cognitive function of older adults: a meta-analytic study. Psychol Sci 2003; 14: 125–130.
12.
Tomporowski PD: Effects of acute bouts of exercise on cognition. Acta Psychol (Amst) 2003; 112: 297–324.
13.
Persson J, Welsh KM, Jonides J, Reuter-Lorenz PA: Cognitive fatigue of executive processes: interaction between interference resolution tasks. Neuropsychologia 2007; 45: 1571–1579.
14.
Boksem MA, Meijman TF, Lorist MM: Mental fatigue, motivation and action monitoring. Biol Psychol 2006; 72: 123–132.
15.
van der Linden D, Frese M, Meijman TF: Mental fatigue and the control of cognitive processes: effects on perseveration and planning. Acta Psychologica (Amst) 2003; 113: 45–65.
16.
Hockey GR: Compensatory control in the regulation of human performance under stress and high workload; a cognitive-energetical framework. Biol Psychol 1997; 45: 73–93.
17.
Vogt T, Herpers R, Scherfgen D, Strüder HK, Schneider S: Neuroelectric adaptations to cognitive processing in virtual environments: an exercise-related approach. Exp Brain Res 2015; 233: 1321–1329.
18.
Kumar N, Singh M, Sood S, Beena, Sakshi, Roy PS, et al: Effect of acute moderate exercise on cognitive P300 in persons having sedentary lifestyles. Int J Appl Basic Med Res 2012; 2: 67–69.
19.
Kumar N, Sood S, Singh M, Beena, Sakshi: Effect of acute moderate exercise on cognitive event-related potentials n100, p200, n200, and interpeak latencies. Indian J Psychol Med 2010; 32: 131–135.
20.
Nanda B, Balde J, Manjunatha S: The acute effects of a single bout of moderate-intensity aerobic exercise on cognitive functions in healthy adult males. J Clin Diagn Res 2013; 7: 1883–1885.
21.
Pontifex MB, Parks AC, Henning DA, Kamijo K: Single bouts of exercise selectively sustain attentional processes. Psychophysiology 2015; 52: 618–625
22.
Smets EM, Garssen B, Bonke B, De Haes JC: The multidimensional fatigue inventory (MFI) psychometric qualities of an instrument to assess fatigue. J Psychol Res 1995; 39: 315–325.
23.
Lorist MM, Klein M, Nieuwenhuis S, De Jong R, Mulder G, Meijman TF: Mental fatigue and task control: planning and preparation. Psychophysiology 2000; 37: 614–625.
24.
Polich J: Updating P300: an integrative theory of P3a and P3b. Clin Neurophysiol 2007; 118: 2128–2148.
25.
Furdea A, Halder S, Krusienski DJ, Bross D, Nijboer F, Birbaumer N, et al: An auditory oddball (P300) spelling system for brain-computer interfaces. Psychophysiology 2009; 46: 617–625.
26.
Henik A: Paying attention to the Stroop effect? J Int Neuropsychol Soc 1996; 2: 467–470.
27.
Folstein MF, Folstein SE, McHugh PR: “Mini-mental state”. A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J Psychiatr Res 1975; 12: 189–198.
28.
Tombaugh TN, McIntyre NJ: The mini-mental state examination: a comprehensive review. J Am Geriatr Soc 1992; 40: 922–935.
29.
Sanchez-Cubillo I, Perianez JA, Adrover-Roig D, Rodriguez-Sanchez JM, Rios-Lago M, Tirapu J, Barcelo F: Construct validity of the trail making test: role of task-switching, working memory, inhibition/interference control, and visuomotor abilities. J Int Neuropsychol Soc 2009; 15: 438–450.
30.
Lord SW, Clayton RH, Hall MC, Gray JC, Murray A, McComb JM, Kenny RA: Reproducibility of three different methods of measuring baroreflex sensitivity in normal subjects. Clin Sci (Lond). 1998; 95: 575–581.
31.
Nash AJ, Williams CS: Effects of preparatory set and task demands on auditory event-related potentials. Biol Psychol 1982; 15: 15–31.
32.
Nakamura Y, Nishimoto K, Akamatu M, Takahashi M, Maruyama A: The effect of jogging on P300 event related potentials. Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol 1999; 39: 71–74.
33.
Koyama H, Fukuda S, Shoji T, Inaba M, Tsujimoto Y, Tabata T, et al: Fatigue is a predictor for cardiovascular outcomes in patients undergoing hemodialysis. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2010; 5: 659–666.
© 2019 S. Karger AG, Basel
2019
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.