Dear Editor,

Creatine is a ubiquitous nitrogen-containing molecule that can be synthesized endogenously in the liver, kidneys, and pancreas or exogenously ingested from foods (e.g., red meat, seafood, and poultry) or ingested as a dietary supplement. Creatine supplementation is purported to enhance the aging bone [1]. Creatine may impact the bone via indirect and direct mechanisms [1]. Indirectly, creatine supplementation elevates phosphocreatine stores in skeletal muscle, increasing the capacity to re-synthesize adenosine triphosphate leading to a greater resistance training capacity and augmenting gains in muscle mass and strength over time [2]. Greater muscle mass and strength results in enhanced muscle pull and stress on the bone during resistance exercise leading to bone accretion. Creatine may also have a direct impact on the bone. Osteocytes rely on phosphocreatine breakdown via creatine kinase reactions [3]. Furthermore, in a low serum cell culture medium, the addition of creatine increases the metabolic activity and differentiation of osteoblast cells (cells involved in bone formation) [4]. Stimulating osteoblast cell activity elevates osteoprotegerin production, a protein that inhibits osteoclast cell activity and decreases bone resorption [1]. In young healthy males and females, creatine (9 g/day for 5 weeks) decreased urinary excretion of cross-linked n-telopeptides of type I collagen (a marker of bone resorption) by 3.6% compared to a 26% increase in conjunction with an intense resistance training regime [5]. In aging males, creatine supplementation (8 g/day for 10–12 weeks) combined with resistance training decreased bone resorption [6].

Currently, there are 10 human randomized placebo-controlled trials investigating creatine combined with resistance training on indices of bone health (summarized in Table 1). Results across individual studies are mixed with some studies showing a positive effect, while others found no effect. Upon closer examination of individual studies, the dose of creatine appears to be an important determinant altering the efficacy of creatine on indices of bone health. Four studies used a dose of 5 g/day of creatine with and without a loading phase (Table 1). All 4 studies were unable to enhance any markers of bone health. The remaining 6 studies used a higher relative dose of creatine (0.1 g/kg/day; ∼7–9 g/day); of these studies, 5 out of 6 found at least 1 positive outcome on bone health. It is well established that 5 g/day of creatine is sufficient to saturate skeletal muscle [7]; however, recent evidence suggests that a higher dose may be superior to augment resistance training strength adaptations (particularly in lower body strength) in older adults [8]. Future research is urgently needed to examine a dose-response relationship of creatine supplementation combined with resistance training on whole body, regional changes, and potential mechanisms to confirm these findings. It is also important to note that creatine must be combined with resistance training to alter bone, reviewed by Forbes et al. [9]. For example, Sales et al. [10] conducted a large 2-year longitudinal trial with creatine (3 g/day) without an exercise intervention and found no effect on bone.

Table 1.

Study characteristics and outcomes of research examining the influence of creatine with a resistance training program on the bone

Study characteristics and outcomes of research examining the influence of creatine with a resistance training program on the bone
Study characteristics and outcomes of research examining the influence of creatine with a resistance training program on the bone

In conclusion, a high dose of creatine combined with resistance training appears to be an effective strategy to enhance bone. A lower dose of 5 g/day is not sufficient to augment indices of bone health.

An ethics statement was not required for this study type, as no human or animal subjects or materials were used.

S.M.O. serves as a member of the Scientific Advisory Board on creatine in health and medicine (AlzChem LLC, Trostberg, Germany). S.M.O. owns patent “Sports Supplements Based on Liquid Creatine” at European Patent Office (WO2019150323 A1) and active patent application “Synergistic Creatine” at UK Intellectual Property Office (GB2012773.4). S.M.O. has served as a speaker at Abbott Nutrition, Chicago, IL, USA, a consultant of Allied Beverages Adriatic and IMLEK, and an advisory board member for the University of Novi Sad School of Medicine and has received research funding related to creatine from the Serbian Ministry of Education, Science, and Technological Development, Provincial Secretariat for Higher Education and Scientific Research, Alz-Chem GmbH, Trostberg, Germany, KW Pfannenschmidt GmbH, Hamburg, Germany, ThermoLife International LLC, Phoenix, AZ, USA, and Monster Energy Co., Corona, CA, USA. S.M.O. does not own stocks and shares in any organization. S.C.F. has previously served as a scientific advisor for a company that sold creatine. D.G.C. has conducted industry-sponsored research involving creatine supplementation and received creatine donations for scientific studies and travel support for presentations involving creatine supplementation at scientific conferences. In addition, D.G.C. serves on the Scientific Advisory Board for AlzChem (a company that manufactures creatine). The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript; or in the decision to publish the results.

This work was not funded by any agency in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

The authors’ responsibilities were as follows: S.C.F. and D.C.G. designed and wrote the draft of the manuscript and has primary responsibility for the final content, and all authors read and approved the final version of the manuscript.

Data described in the manuscript will be made available upon request.

1.
Forbes
SC
,
Chilibeck
PD
,
Candow
DG
.
Creatine supplementation during resistance training does not lead to greater bone mineral density in older humans: a brief meta-analysis
.
Front Nutr
.
2018
;
5
:
27
. .
2.
Forbes
SC
,
Candow
DG
,
Ostojic
SM
,
Roberts
MD
,
Chilibeck
PD
.
Meta-Analysis Examining the Importance of Creatine Ingestion Strategies on Lean Tissue Mass and Strength in Older Adults
.
Nutrients
.
2021
;
13
(
6
):
1912
.
3.
Wallimann
T
,
Tokarska-Schlattner
M
,
Schlattner
U
.
The creatine kinase system and pleiotropic effects of creatine
.
Amino Acids
.
2011
;
40
(
5
):
1271
1296
.
4.
Gerber
I
.
Stimulatory effects of creatine on metabolic activity, differentiation and mineralization of primary osteoblast-like cells in monolayer and micromass cell cultures
.
eCM
.
2005
;
10
:
8
22
.
5.
Cornish
SM
,
Candow
DG
,
Jantz
NT
,
Chilibeck
PD
,
Little
JP
,
Forbes
S
,
Conjugated linoleic acid combined with creatine monohydrate and whey protein supplementation during strength training
.
Int J Sport Nutr Exerc Metab
.
2009
;
19
:
79
96
. .
6.
Candow
DG
,
Little
JP
,
Chilibeck
PD
,
Abeysekara
S
,
Zello
GA
,
Kazachkov
M
,
Low-dose creatine combined with protein during resistance training in older men
.
Med Sci Sports Exerc
.
2008
;
40
:
1645
52
. .
7.
Hultman
E
,
Söderlund
K
,
Timmons
JA
,
Cederblad
G
,
Greenhaff
PL
.
Muscle creatine loading in men
.
J Appl Physiol
.
1996
;
81
:
232
7
. .
8.
Forbes
SC
,
Candow
DG
,
Ostojic
SM
,
Roberts
MD
,
Chilibeck
PD
.
Meta-analysis examining the importance of creatine ingestion strategies on lean tissue mass and strength in older adults
.
Nutrients
.
2021
;
13
:
1912
.
9.
Forbes
S
,
Candow
D
,
Ferreira
L
,
Souza-Junior
T
.
Effects of creatine supplementation on properties of muscle, bone, and brain function in older adults: a narrative review
.
J Diet Suppl
.
2021
:
1
18
.
10.
Sales
LP
,
Pinto
AJ
,
Rodrigues
SF
,
Alvarenga
JC
,
Gonçalves
N
,
Sampaio-Barros
MM
,
Creatine supplementation (3 g/d) and bone health in older women: a 2-year, randomized, placebo-controlled trial
.
J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci
.
2020
;
75
:
931
8
. .
11.
Brose
A
,
Parise
G
,
Tarnopolsky
MA
.
Creatine supplementation enhances isometric strength and body composition improvements following strength exercise training in older adults
.
J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci
.
2003
;
58
:
11
9
. .
12.
Candow
DG
,
Forbes
SC
,
Vogt
E
.
Effect of pre-exercise and post-exercise creatine supplementation on bone mineral content and density in healthy aging adults
.
Exp Gerontol
.
2019
;
119
:
89
92
. .
13.
Candow
DG
,
Chilibeck
PD
,
Gordon
J
,
Vogt
E
,
Landeryou
T
,
Kaviani
M
,
Effect of 12 months of creatine supplementation and whole-body resistance training on measures of bone, muscle and strength in older males
.
Nutr Health
.
2020
;
27
:
151
9
. .
14.
Chilibeck
P
,
Chrusch
M
,
Chad
K
,
Davison
S
,
Burke
D
.
Creatine monohydrate and resistance training increase bone mineral content and density in older men
.
J Nutr Health Aging
.
2005
;
9
:
352
3
.
15.
Chilibeck
PD
,
Candow
DG
,
Landeryou
T
,
Kaviani
M
,
Paus-Jenssen
L
.
Effects of creatine and resistance training on bone health in postmenopausal women
.
Med Sci Sports Exerc
.
2015
;
47
(
8
):
1587
95
. .
16.
Gualano
B
,
Macedo
AR
,
Alves
CR
,
Roschel
H
,
Benatti
FB
,
Takayama
L
,
Creatine supplementation and resistance training in vulnerable older women: a randomized double-blind placebo-controlled clinical trial
.
Exp Gerontol
.
2014
;
53
:
7
15
. .
17.
Pinto
CL
,
Botelho
PB
,
Carneiro
JA
,
Mota
JF
.
Impact of creatine supplementation in combination with resistance training on lean mass in the elderly
.
J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle
.
2016
;
7
:
413
. .
18.
Tarnopolsky
M
,
Zimmer
A
,
Paikin
J
,
Safdar
A
,
Aboud
A
,
Pearce
E
,
Creatine monohydrate and conjugated linoleic acid improve strength and body composition following resistance exercise in older adults
.
PLoS One
.
2007
;
2
:
e991
. .
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.