Abstract
Long-chain polyunsaturated fatty acids (LCPUFAs) play specific roles during the perinatal period and are very important nutrients to consider. The possible effects of LCPUFAs, particularly docosahexaenoic acid (DHA), on various clinical outcomes of preterm infants are discussed in this paper. Since DHA accumulates in the central nervous system during development, a lot of attention has focused on the effects of DHA on neurodevelopment. Experimental studies as well as recent clinical trials show that providing larger amounts of DHA than currently and routinely provided is associated with better neurological outcomes at 18 months to 2 years. This early advantage, however, does not seem to translate into detectable change in visual and neurodevelopmental outcomes or behavior when assessed in childhood. There is growing evidence that, in addition to effects on development, omega-3 LCPUFAs may reduce the incidence or severity of neonatal morbidities by affecting different steps of the immune and anti-inflammatory response. Studies in preterm infants suggest that the omega-3 LCPUFAs may play a significant role by reducing the risk of bronchopulmonary dysplasia, necrotizing enterocolitis and possibly retinopathy of prematurity and sepsis. Overall, evidence is increasing to support the benefits of high-dose DHA for various health outcomes of preterm infants. These findings are of major clinical relevance mainly because infants born preterm are at particularly high risk for a nutritional deficit in omega-3 fatty acids, predisposing to adverse neonatal outcomes. Further studies are warranted to address these issues as well as to more precisely determine the LCPUFA requirement in order to favor the best possible outcomes of preterm infants.
Key Messages
• Recent clinical trials show that providing larger amounts of docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) than currently and routinely provided is associated with better neurological outcomes at 18 months to 2 years.
• There is growing evidence that omega-3 long-chain polyunsaturated fatty acids, particularly DHA, may reduce the incidence or severity of neonatal morbidities by affecting different steps of the immune and anti-inflammatory response.
Introduction
Preterm birth is the leading cause of child mortality in high- and middle-income countries. The risk of morbidity and mortality in infants born very and extremely premature has been well documented [1]. Fortunately, improved pre- and postnatal care has led to reduced mortality and morbidity. However, the risk of severe medical disabilities increases sharply with decreasing gestational age (GA) at birth [1].
During the initial part of hospitalization, immature infants need parenteral nutrition to meet their nutritional requirements. Afterwards, nutrition is supplied via the enteral route using either enriched breast milk or preterm formula. However, replacing the nutrition provided by the placenta is difficult, and postnatal malnutrition and growth failure are commonly seen in preterm infants.
The brain is particularly vulnerable to the influences of nutrition between 24 and 42 weeksof gestation [2]. Thus, fetal and neonatal malnutrition may have global or isolated effects on the developing brain, depending on the requirements of the particular nutrients at the time of the deficit [2]. Both early and enhanced supply of energy, protein and lipids have shown to be beneficial for growth and neurodevelopment [3, 4]. Moreover, optimized nutrition has been shown to mediate disease severity [5].
The main target for feeding preterm infants is to achieve growth that resembles normal fetal growth rates [6]. In recent recommendations, this goal has been extended to achieving satisfactory functional development. The estimated amounts of nutrients necessary for growth similar to that of the fetal model are based on estimates obtained by factorial as well as empirical methods [6].
It is important to consider long-chain polyunsaturated fatty acids (LCPUFAs) due to their specific roles during the perinatal period. Therefore, the aim of this paper is to review the possible effects of LCPUFAs, particularly docosahexaenoic acid (DHA), on various clinical outcomes of preterm infants.
LCPUFA Metabolism during the Perinatal Period
The PUFAs linoleic acid and α-linolenic acid are essential fatty acids that must be provided exogenously [6, 7]. Linoleic acid is converted to arachidonic acid (AA) and α-linolenic acid to docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) and eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA). Particularly AA and DHA accumulate rapidly during the last trimester and the first postnatal months, i.e. the period of rapid growth and brain development [6, 7]. DHA is the main lipid of the central nervous system and comprises as much as 30-50% of neuronal plasma membranes by weight [7, 8]. However, fetal brain accretion amounted to only 1.1 and 4.65% of the total body accretion of the omega-6 (n-6) and omega-3 (n-3) fatty acids, respectively [9]. Since most LCPUFAs accumulate in the white adipose tissue and to a lesser extent in the lean mass and in the liver, the DHA accumulation in other organs as well as the accumulation of other LCPUFAs is important to take into account when determining requirements.
AA and DHA are transferred by special transport molecules across the placenta to the fetus. The placenta provides the fetus with a selectivity which favors the transfer of DHA over all other fatty acids including AA [10]. There is evidence from stable isotope studies that AA and DHA synthesis can occur in premature infants. It has also been deduced from these tracer studies that the rate of AA synthesis is significantly greater than that of DHA, suggesting that the fetus has a greater ability to regulate its own levels of AA, not those of DHA, by de novo synthesis or reuptake by the placenta [10]. Overall, these data suggest that DHA supply may be more critical than that of AA during the perinatal period.
Studies conducted by using the LCPUFA precursors labeled with stable isotopes indicate that LCPUFA synthesis occurs even in small preterm infants and appears to be higher than in term infants. However, based on estimates of LCPUFA endogenous synthesis rates, premature infants appear to have an endogenous capacity for conversion of α-linolenic acid to DHA and EPA that cannot fulfill the requirement based on the fetal accretion rate [8, 11]. Furthermore, extremely premature infants are at increased risk of developing deficits in n-3 LCPUFAs due to the lack of adipose stores and limited provision of preformed LCPUFAs through nutritional sources.
The in utero accretion rate of DHA is estimated to be 43 and 212 mg/kg/day for DHA and AA, respectively [12]. It has been shown that current nutritional management of preterm infants leads to an early and severe DHA deficit, increasing with decreasing GA [13]. Depletion of DHA may lead to reduced visual function and alterations in behavior or cognitive performance [14], whereas DHA and AA supplementation has shown positive effects on growth, visual function and mental development in randomized controlled trials (RCT) [15, 16, 17, 18].
Vision and Brain Development
In experimental studies, poor accumulation of retinal and brain DHA leads to abnormal retinal physiology, poor visual acuity, increased duration of visual fixation, and increased stereotyped behaviors and locomotor activity [14]. The evidence most relevant to the issue of causality showed that control performance levels can be restored when DHA is added to the diets of animals in which brain DHA concentration had been severely reduced. Nevertheless, the magnitude of these effects is not large, despite the fact that the studies were conducted under profound dietary restriction.
Studies in preterm infants indicate possible benefits for retinal and cognitive development, as suggested by greater retinal sensitivity to photic stimulation assessed by electroretinography, more mature visual acuity, and short-term effects on global developmental outcomes at 6-18 months after DHA supplementation of preterm infant formula in controlled clinical studies [19, 20].
With regard to neurodevelopment in preterm infants, recent meta-analyses suggest that benefits of formula supplementation with LCPUFA are less clear [21]. Among many possible explanations for the difficulty in demonstrating clinical benefits of LCPUFA supplementation in preterm formulas by meta-analysis are the extreme variability in study designs and the selection of relatively mature and healthy preterm infants which are likely less DHA deficient than very preterm infants. Furthermore, the meta-analyses include studies comparing some LCPUFA supplementation versus no supplementation and do not include studies comparing two doses of LCPUFAs. Interestingly, the amount of LCPUFAs used in early studies was chosen to produce the same concentration of AA and DHA in formula as in term breast milk (i.e. 0.2-0.4% fatty acids). This may not be a wise approach for preterm infants and, particularly, for very and extremely preterm infants because the amount of DHA provided by ingesting breast milk is below the in utero accretion rate [13].
Three studies report outcome data in preterm infants fed milk with a higher DHA content of 0.5-1.7% of total fatty acids. The first study, which examined the effect of providing DHA supplementation (0.50% of total fatty acids) for up to 9 months after term, showed that DHA improved growth in the whole cohort of preterm infants and improved mental development in boys [22]. In the second study, the effect of the supplementation during hospitalization of human milk with oils that provided an extra 32 mg of DHA and AA per 100 ml was assessed [15]. At the 6-month follow-up evaluation, the intervention group performed better than the control group in the problem-solving subscore of the Ages and Stages Questionnaire, and in the electrophysiologic assessment of event-related potentials, suggesting better recognition memory. At 20 months' postnatal age, no differences in the mental and motor development scores of the Ages and Stages Questionnaire or in the Mental Development Index (MDI) score of the Bayley Scales of Infant Development were observed, but the intervention group had better results at 20 months at the free-play sessions, suggesting positive effects from supplementation on functions related to attention. Finally, plasma DHA concentration at discharge was positively correlated with the Bayley MDI and with ‘sustained attention' [18]. Long-term follow-up, at 8 years of age, showed no effects on white matter microstructure, behavioral outcome, and cognitive functions [23, 24]. The third study was designed to compare the effects of a high versus standard DHA intake during hospitalization (i.e. 1 vs. 0.35% total fatty acids as DHA) while AA intake was kept constant (0.5% total fatty acids) [17, 25]. Visual acuity was improved significantly at 4 months corrected age. At 18 months, there were no overall differences in MDI or in the Psychomotor Developmental Index of the Bayley Scales, but fewer infants were classified as having an MDI score of less than 70. Infants who weighed <1,250 g and were fed the high-DHA diet had a higher MDI score than controls (mean difference = 4.6, 95% CI 0.1-9.0, p < 0.05), but the difference was not significant when GA at delivery, sex, maternal education, and birth order were taken into account. Girls, but not boys, fed a high-DHA diet had higher MDI scores and were less likely to have mild or significant developmental delay than control girls. Finally, the early advantage seen on visual and cognitive functions did not translate into any clinically meaningful change in visual and neurodevelopmental outcomes or behavior when assessed in childhood [26, 27, 28].
Overall, these studies show that providing larger amounts of DHA supplements is associated with better neurological outcomes at 18 months to 2 years (fig. 1). One study suggested that the smallest babies are the most vulnerable to DHA deficiency and likely to reap the greatest benefit from high-dose DHA supplementation. The observation that a nonsignificant difference in mean MDI translated to fewer infants with a low MDI score suggests that a high dose of DHA is more efficient, or is only efficient, in certain subgroups of infants, probably those at high risk of DHA deficiency.
LCPUFAs as Immunonutrients
Immature infants are at risk of experiencing concomitant diseases due to immaturity, among these: bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD), retinopathy of prematurity (ROP), necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC), white matter injury of the brain (WMI), persistent ductus arteriosus, and septicemia. Perinatal infections or inflammation processes seem important in the pathogenesis of several of these comorbidities [29, 30]. Recent studies have demonstrated that immature infants have elevated levels of inflammatory cytokines during the neonatal period, and that upregulated cytokine expression is positively associated with BPD, ROP, WMI, and impaired neurodevelopmental outcomes [30, 31, 32]. A proposed mechanism behind the upregulated immune response is sustained activation (ongoing exogenous exposures) and/or impaired resolution of inflammation [31].
There is growing evidence that in addition to structural effects on growth and organ development, n-3 LCPUFAs, particularly DHA and EPA, may reduce the incidence or severity of BPD, ROP, NEC, and WMI by affecting different steps of the immune response [33, 34]. LCPUFAs have the capacity to influence the immune response by several means.
Certain LCPUFAs serve as precursors for the synthesis of eicosanoids (e.g. dihomo-γ-linolenic acid (20:3n-6), AA, and EPA) and docosanoids (e.g. DHA). AA is a precursor of pro-inflammatory mediators (such as leukotrienes of the n-4 series), and of prostaglandins and thromboxanes of the n-2 series, which increase the vascular tone and promote platelet aggregation. AA is also a precursor of lipoxins which are inflammation-resolving mediators. In contrast, prostaglandins and thromboxanes of the n-3 series and leukotrienes of the n-5 series, formed from EPA, have many antagonistic effects such as a reduction in platelet aggregation and vascular tone as well as less inflammatory effects. Metabolites from EPA can modulate inflammation by decreasing the production of pro-inflammatory cytokines (TNF-α, IL-1β, and IL-6) through the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor pathways, which in turn inhibits the nuclear transcription factor κB (NF-κB), and increasing the production and secretion of anti-inflammatory eicosanoids as interleukin-10 [33]. Resolvins, protectins, and maresins formed from n-3 LCPUFAs evoke anti-inflammatory and pro-resolving mechanisms, and enhance microbial clearance [34].
Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia
BPD is defined as persistent oxygen dependency at 36 weeks' postmenstrual age and is, along with postnatal growth restriction, the most common morbidity of prematurity. BPD occurs mostly in infants born before 28 weeks of gestation [1]. BPD is characterized by diffuse fibrosis of the lung and impaired alveolar development [35]. Although the pathogenesis is multifactorial, intrauterine and postnatal growth restriction is an independent risk factor, possibly by affecting pulmonary alveolar and vessel growth [35].
Lipids have been considered toxic in acute respiratory failure since they may induce or intensify gas exchange abnormalities. The historical pure soybean lipid emulsion induces an increase in intrapulmonary shunt with reduction of the PaO2/FiO2 ratio concordant with an increase in pulmonary blood pressure and vascular resistances [36]. In contrast there is some evidence from experimental studies that n-3 LCPUFAs may be beneficial in conditions associated with pulmonary hypertension through production of epoxides [37]. This, in turn, may reduce the need for mechanical ventilation and the risk of BPD.
The beneficial effect of DHA on lung function is supported by animal studies. For example, in a rat model of hyperoxia-induced lung injury, DHA supplementation was shown to decrease leukocyte infiltration in the pups of DHA supplemented nursing dams [38]. Separate studies have also demonstrated that exposure to high DHA increases the production of dipalmitoylphosphatidylcholine, the major surfactant lipid in the fetal and neonatal lung [39]. Some studies suggest that the use of a fish oil lipid emulsion or of a fish oil mixed lipid emulsion may reduce the risk of BPD and that adequate n-3 LCPUFA status may protect newborns from lung injuries induced by hyperoxia [40]. Along with sufficient early supply of protein and energy to promote growth, n-3 PUFAs seem to protect against lung injury or reduce BPD severity by a DHA-dependent activation of the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor pathways, thereby accelerating lung maturation, pneumocyte growth and vasoproliferation [41].
In severe sepsis and in patients with acute lung injury, fatty acids from fish oil were found to attenuate the initial injurious hyperinflammatory state [42]. The bronchoalveolar lavages of adult patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome receiving n-3 fatty acids and γ-linoleic acid show an important decrease in global cell count, in polymorphonuclear cell percentage, IL-8 and leukotriene B4 concentrations. The specific change in immune response was associated with an improvement of the PaO2/FiO2 ratio, a reduction in mechanical ventilation need and duration, a decrease risk of complications, and a decreased length of stay in the intensive care unit [43].
Studies in preterm infants suggest improved lung development and a reduced incidence of BPD with fish oil supplementation [35]. The best evidence of the effects of n-3 fatty acids on the prevention of BPD comes from a large randomized trial assessing the effects of 60 mg/kg/day DHA compared with a standard dose of 20 mg/kg/day DHA on neurodevelopmental outcome of 657 preterm infants [17]. The study was not designed to test BPD; however, in exploratory analyses in the subgroup of infants less than 29 weeks' GA, there was a significant reduction in infants requiring supplemental oxygen at 36 weeks' postmenstrual age (RR 0.76, 95% CI 0.58-1.00, p = 0.05).
A recent meta-analysis targeting the role of LCPUFA supplementation in preterm infants born before 33 weeks of gestation found potential protective effects of n-3 fatty acids on BPD [44]. The effects were found for all interventions (RR 0.88, 95% CI 0.74-1.05) and in the subgroup of RCT that exclusively supplemented with n-3 LCPUFA (RR 0.84, 95% CI 0.66-1.13).
Retinopathy of Prematurity
In the retina, DHA is especially enriched in rod photoreceptor outer segments and essential for their differentiation, survival, and signal transduction [45]. ROP is a disorder of vascular development of the retina and it is the main reason for visual impairment in extreme premature infants. As for the lung, both nutritional and inflammatory factors seem to be important mediators in disease progression. Dietary n-3 LCPUFA reduces pathologic retinal neovascularization in oxygen-induced retinopathy in mice [46]. Two studies, one observational and one not blinded, reported a reduction in the need for laser therapy for ROP in very premature infants using fish oil supplementation in the lipid emulsion [47, 48]. Another study of infants with a GA of 28-31 weeks reported less ROP in fish oil-supplemented infants but no difference in need for treatment of proliferative disease [49]. Two other randomized controlled studies did not show any beneficial of fish oil lipid emulsion on ROP [50, 51].
While many studies have focused on DHA and its importance for vision and cognitive development, few studies have addressed the role of AA during fetal and neonatal life and after preterm birth. Just like DHA, AA is an important component of cell membranes where a change in composition results in changed function [52]. AA is an important precursor of factors, which appear essential for angiogenesis and thereby may play a significant role in the pathogenicity of ROP [52].
White Matter Injury
The most common brain injuries in premature infants are intraventricular hemorrhage and periventricular leukomalacia; with severe brain injury being defined as the presence of either intraventricular hemorrhage grade ≥3 or cystic periventricular leukomalacia. Indeed, WMI is associated with poor nutritional status as well as inflammation [29]. n-3 LCPUFAs, particularly DHA, are essential nutrients in brain development. In addition to being an important building block, DHA is also a substrate for neuroprotectin D1, which inhibits the pro-inflammatory cytokine production in human glial cells. In the same line of evidence, some experimental studies have shown that providing DHA may prevent neonatal brain injury by inhibiting oxidative stress and apoptosis of neuron cells [53]. Since most extremely premature infants receive insufficient amounts of DHA during neonatal hospitalization, providing adequate amounts of essential fatty acids to extremely premature infants, including preformed DHA and EPA, from birth onward, may improve neurodevelopmental outcome by mediating brain inflammation.
Sepsis and Noninfectious Inflammation
Very preterm infants are susceptible to sepsis, possibly as a result of attenuated innate immune responses [31]. Interestingly, these infants also show signs of sustained systemic inflammation with elevated pro-inflammatory cytokines. Sepsis may be defined as ‘the host's deleterious and nonresolving systemic inflammatory response to microbial infection' [54]. The host response is similar to the activation triggered by noninfectious tissue injuries like trauma, burns and ischemic reperfusion events [30], making it difficult to distinguish them from another. The newly identified alarmin molecule High Mobility Group Box 1 (HMGB1), which has been recognized as an important mediator of sepsis [30], is also thought to play an important role in lung injury and the pathogenesis of BPD [55]. HMGB1, an activator of NF-κB, is released by necrotic, but not apoptotic cells, and sustains the inflammatory process after the resolution of the early stage of inflammation [55]. As mentioned, one of the anti-inflammatory potentials of n-3 LCPUFAs is the ability to inhibit the activation of NF-κB [33], and thereby possibly modulate an inappropriate inflammatory response. These pathophysiological observations are in accordance with the observed association between low DHA and AA concentrations and the increased incidence of sepsis in preterm infants [58].
Necrotizing Enterocolitis
NEC is a serious disease of the gastrointestinal tract in very preterm infants and may lead to intestinal failure or death. The pathogenesis is multifactorial, but as with the other above-mentioned neonatal comorbidities, numerous inflammatory mediators seem to play a role in disease progression, among them HGMB1 [56, 57]. Several experimental models of NEC have demonstrated LCPUFA modulated reduction in both incidence and severity of bowel disease through multiple pathways associated with intestinal inflammation and necrosis [58, 59, 60, 61]. The protective effects of DHA are multifactorial. Local cell membrane phospholipids play a structural role in protecting the integrity of intestinal cells and alterations in LCPUFA content is important in bacterial translocation and intracellular fluid shifts associated with cell stress signaling that initiates NEC [58].
Despite promising animal studies, results in preterm infants are mixed. In part, this may also be due to limited sample sizes, variable timing and dosing of DHA supplementation and similar confounding as described above. In an RCT, premature infants who were fed a DHA-supplemented formula had a decreased incidence of NEC compared to those who were fed a formula devoid of LCPUFAs [62]. Recently, a systematic review of n-3 LCPUFAs for extremely preterm infants found a trend toward a reduction in the risk of NEC (RR 0.50, 95% CI 0.23-1.10) [44].
Conclusion
Since DHA accumulates in the central nervous system during development, a lot of attention has initially focused on the effects of DHA on neurodevelopment. Experimental studies as well as recent clinical trials show that providing larger amounts of DHA than currently and routinely provided is associated with better neurological outcomes at 18 months to 2 years. This early advantage, however, does not seem to translate into detectable change in visual and neurodevelopmental outcomes or behavior when assessed in childhood. However, this does not mean that supplementing with adequate amounts of LCPUFA during the perinatal period is not necessary.
Beside the effects on somatic development, there is growing evidence that n-3 LCPUFAs, particularly DHA and EPA, may reduce the incidence or severity of the most common comorbidities of prematurity by affecting different steps of the immune and anti-inflammatory response. These findings are of major clinical relevance mainly because infants born preterm, especially the smallest ones, are at particularly high risk for a nutritional deficit in n-3 fatty acids, predisposing to adverse neonatal outcomes. Further studies are warranted to address these issues as well as to more precisely determine the LCPUFA requirement in order to favor the best possible outcomes of preterm infants.
Acknowledgements
The authors thank the ‘Association pour la Recherche et la Formation En Neonatologie (ARFEN)' for providing technical assistance.
Disclosure Statement
The authors have no conflicts of interest relevant to this article to disclose and have no financial disclosure to declare.
The writing of this article was supported by Nestlé Nutrition Institute.