Abstract
Background: Industrialization and urbanization jeopardized infant nutrition during the 19th century. Cow's milk was produced in the cities or transported long distances under suspect conditions. Milk was contaminated with bacteria or adulterated with water, flour, chalk and other substances. When distilleries proliferated in the metropoles, their waste slop was fed to cows which then produced thin and contaminated swill milk. Summary: Following a press campaign in the USA, the sale of swill milk was prohibited by law in 1861. Bacterial counts became available in 1881 and helped to improve the quality of milk. Debates on pasteurization remained controversial; legislation varied from country to country. Disposal of the wastewater of millions of inhabitants and the manure of thousands of cows was environmentally hazardous. It was not until 1860 and after several pandemics of Asiatic cholera that effective sewage systems were built in the metropoles. Milk depots were established in the USA by Koplik for sterilized and by Coit for certified milk. In France, Budin and Dufour created consultation services named goutte de lait, which distributed sterilized milk and educated mothers in infant care. Message: Multiple efforts to improve milk quality culminated in the International gouttes de lait Congresses for the Study and Prevention of Infantile Mortality.
References
1.
Commission on adulteration. The Lancet 1855;66:551.
2.
Mitchell J: Treatise on the Falsifications of Food, and the Chemical Means Employed to Detect Them. London, Baillière, 1848, pp 74-81.
3.
Griset E, Hood T: The cow with the iron tail; in Griset E (ed): Griset's Grotesques; or, Jokes Drawn on Wood. London, Routledge & Sons, 1867, p 80.
4.
Vernois AGM, Becquerel A: Recherches sur le lait. Deuxième partie. Ann Hyg Publ Méd Légale 1853;50:43-147.
5.
Hennig C: Neuere Erfahrungen über Ersatzmittel der Muttermilch. Jahrb Kinderheilkd 1874;7:41-60.
6.
Martiny B: Die Milch, ihr Wesen und ihre Verwerthung. Danzig, Kafemann, 1871, vol 1, pp 126-169.
7.
Braudel F: Die Geschichte der Zivilisation. 15. bis 18. Jahrhundert; in Schmalzriedt E (ed): Kindlers Kulturgeschichte. München, Kindler, 1971, p 258.
8.
Hartley RM: An Historical, Scientific, and Practical Essay on Milk as an Article of Human Sustenance; with a Consideration of the Effects Consequent upon the Present Unnatural Methods of Producing It for the Supply of Large Cities. New York, Jonathan Leavitt, 1842, pp 132-146, 198.
9.
Reese DM: Report in Infant Mortality in Large Cities, the Sources of Its Increase, and Means for Its Diminution. Philadelphia, T.K. and P.G. Collins, Printers, 1857.
10.
Berghaus A, Nast T: Exposure of the milk trade of New York and Brooklyn/the swill milk trade. Frank Leslie's Illustrated Newspaper 1858;5:358-410.
11.
Leslie F: A great victory won! Swill milk abolished by law. Frank Leslie's Illustrated Newspaper 1861;11:305.
12.
Sutherland JB: Improved refrigerator-car. United States Patent Office. Patent No 71423. 1867.
13.
Dodd FL: Municipal Milk and Public Health. Fabian Tracts 1905;3:1-19, reprint London 1969.
14.
Fauvel H: Note sur les altérations du lait dans les biberons, constatées en même temps que la présence d'une végétation cryptogamique dans l'appareil en caoutchouc qui s'adapte au récipient en verre. Bull Acad Méd 1881;10:614-617.
15.
Atkins PJ: White poison? The social consequences of milk consumption, 1850-1930. Social Hist Med 1992;5:207-227.
16.
Koch R: The combating of tuberculosis in the light of the experience that has been gained in the successful combating of other infectious diseases. Lancet 1901;158:187-191.
17.
Francis J: The work of the British Royal Commission on Tuberculosis, 1901-1911. Tubercle (London) 1959;40:124-132.
18.
Orland B: Cow's milk and human disease. Bovine tuberculosis and the difficulties involved in combating animal diseases. Food Hist 2003;1:179-202.
19.
Nocard M: Mammite contagieuse. Bull Mém Soc Centrale Méd Vét 1885;39:296-302.
20.
Lancefield RC: A serological differentiation of human and other groups of hemolytic streptococci. J Exp Med 1933;57:571-595.
21.
Eickhoff TC, Klein JO, Daly K, Ingall D, Finland M: Neonatal sepsis and other infections due to group B beta-hemolytic streptococci. New Engl J Med 1964;271:1221-1228.
22.
Plinius Secundus the Elder C: Naturalis Historia - Naturkunde. Darmstadt, Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft, 1992, p 75.
23.
Mercier LS: Paris Delineated, from the French of Mercier, Including a Description of the Principal Edifices and Curiosities of that Metropolis. London, Symonds, 1802, vol 1, pp 21-25.
24.
Brunfaut J: Hygiène publique. Les odeurs de Paris, ed 2. Paris, Ambroise Lefèvre, Libraire, 1882.
25.
Forsyth D: The history of infant-feeding from Elizabethan times. Proc R Soc Med 1911;4:110-141.
26.
Furnivall FJ: Early English Meals and Manners: John Russells Boke of Nurture etc. with Some Forewords on Education in Early England. London, Trübner & Co, 1868, p LXVI.
27.
Ward R: London's New River. London, Historical Publications Ltd, 2003.
28.
Halliday S: The Great Stink of London: Sir Joseph Bazalgette and the Cleansing of the Victorian Metropolis. Stroud, Sutton, 1999.
29.
Duffy J: A History of Public Health in New York City 1625-1866. New York, Russell Sage Foundation, 1968.
30.
Hobrecht J: Die Canalisation von Berlin. Im Auftrage des Magistrats der königl. Haupt- und Residenzstadt Berlin entworfen und ausgeführt, nebst einem Atlas in Gross-Folio mit LVII Tafeln. Berlin Ernst & Korn, 1884.
31.
Koplik H: The history of the first milk depot or Gouttes de Lait with consultants in America. JAMA 1914;63:1574-1575.
32.
Waserman M: Henry L: Coit and the certified milk movement in the development of modern pediatrics. Bull Hist Med 1946;46:359-390.
33.
Coit HL: Certified milk. Arch Pediatr 1897;14:824-826.
34.
Kerr JW: Data regarding operations of infants' milk depots in the United States in 1910. Public Health Rep 1911;26:1227-1245.
35.
Atkins P: Liquid materialities. A history of milk, science and the law. Farnham, Ashgate, 2010.
36.
Hess AF: Scurvy. Past and Present. Philadelphia, Lippincott, 1920.
37.
Morse JL: Recollections and reflections on forty-five years of artificial infant feeding. Pediatrics 1935;7:303-324.
38.
Straus LG: Disease in milk - The Remedy: Pasteurization. New York, Dutton, 1913, pp 47, 161.
39.
Harris FD: The supply of sterilised humanised milk for the use of infants in St Helens. Br Med J 1900;2:427-431.
40.
McCleary GF: The infants' milk depot: its history and functions. J Hyg (London) 1904;4:329-368.
41.
Anderson BWF, Straus N, Lister TD, et al: A discussion on infant milk depots. Br Med J 1905;2:643-647.
42.
Editorial: Milk: safe or unsafe? Boston Med Surg J 1923;188:177.
43.
Sharp JCM, Paterson GM, Barrett NJ: Pasteurisation and the control of milkborne infection in Britain. Br Med J 1985;291:463-464.
44.
Weisbecker A: A legal history of raw milk in the United States. J Environ Health 2007;69:62-63.
45.
Sautereau M: Aux origines de la pédiatrie moderne: le docteur Léon Dufour et l'oeuvre de la ‘Goutte de lait' (1894-1928). Ann Normandie 1991;41:217-233.
46.
Dwork D: The milk option. An aspect of the history of the infant welfare movement in England 1898-1908. Med Hist 1987;31:51-69.
47.
Rollet C: La santé et la protection de l'enfant vues à travers les congrès internationaux (1880-1920). Ann Dém Hist 2001;1:97-116.
48.
Agostoni C, Turck D: Is cow's milk harmful to a child's health? J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 2011;53:594-600.
49.
Krafft G: Lehrbuch der Landwirthschaft auf wissenschaftlicher und praktischer Grundlage, ed 4. Berlin, Parey, 1885, vol 3: Tierzucht, pp 124-131.
50.
Geoffroy J: L'oeuvre de la goutte de lait (triptych [,]oil on canvas). Paris, Musée de l'Assistance Publique, 1901.
© 2014 S. Karger AG, Basel
2014
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.
