Objective: The aim of our study was to evaluate the accuracy of the equations to estimate REE in obese patents and develop a new equation in our obese population. Subjects and Methods: A population of 200 obesity outpatients was analyzed in a prospective way. The following variables were specifically recorded: age, weight, body mass index (BMI), waist circumference, and waist-to-hip ratio. Basal glucose, insulin, and TSH (thyroid-stimulating hormone) were measured. An indirect calorimetry and a tetrapolar electrical bioimpedance were performed. REE measured by indirect calorimetry was compared with REE obtained by prediction equations to obese or nonobese patients. Results: The mean age was 44.8 ± 16.81 years and the mean BMI 34.4 ± 5.3. Indirect calorimetry showed that, as compared to women, men had higher resting energy expenditure (REE) (1,998.1 ± 432 vs. 1,663.9 ± 349 kcal/day; p < 0.05) and oxygen consumption (284.6 ± 67.7 vs. 238.6 ± 54.3 ml/min; p < 0.05). Correlation analysis among REE obtained by indirect calorimetry and REE predicted by prediction equations showed the next data; Berstein’s equation (r = 0.65; p < 0.05), Harris Benedict’s equation (r = 0.58; p < 0.05), Owen’s equation (r = 0.56; p < 0.05), Ireton’s equation (r = 0.58; p < 0.05) and WHO’s equation (r = 0.57; p < 0.05). Both the Berstein’s and the Ireton’s equations overpredicted REE and showed nonsignificant mean differences form measured REE. The Owen’s, WHO’s, and Harris Benedict’s equations underpredicted REE. Our male prediction equation was REE = 58.6 + (6.1×weight (kg)) + (1,023.7×height (m)) – (9.5×age). The female model was REE = 1,272.5 + (9.8×weight (kg)) – (61.6×height (m)) – (8.2×age). Our prediction equations showed a nonsignificant difference with REE measured (–3.7 kcal/day) with a significant correlation coefficient (r = 0.67; p < 0.05). Conclusion: Previously developed prediction equations overestimated and underestimated REE measured. WHO equation developed in normal weight individuals provided the closest values. The two new equations (male and female equations) developed in our study had a good accuracy.

This content is only available via PDF.
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.