Bardoxolone methyl has been reported to cause detrimental cardiovascular events in the terminated BEACON Phase III human clinical trial via modulation of the renal endothelin pathway. However, the effects of bardoxolone methyl administration on the endothelin pathway in the heart are unknown. Our purpose in this perspective is to highlight the distinctive opposing roles of the renal and heart endothelin pathway in cardiac function. Furthermore, we address the need for further investigation in order to determine if bardoxolone methyl has a protective role in cardiac function through the suppression of the endothelin pathway in the heart.

The paradoxical nature of bardoxolone methyl (BM) has been widely noted in recent scientific literature [1]. There are many known anti-inflammatory and anti-oxidative properties of this drug that have shown promise in preclinical studies, including treating complications of diabetes such as retinopathy and nephropathy [2]. In addition, phases 1 and II of human clinical trials in patients with chronic kidney disease found that BM markedly improved kidney function [3,4]. These positive results from the earlier phases led to the BEACON phase III human clinical trial in patients with type 2 diabetes and stage 4 chronic kidney disease [5]. However, this trial was terminated due to safety concerns centred on an increased incidence of cardiovascular events in BM-treated patients compared to the placebo group [6]. This has led to skepticism in the scientific community as to whether BM will ever be used in the future treatment of diseases such as chronic kidney disease.

Mechanisms contributing to adverse cardiovascular events seen in patients treated with BM in the BEACON trial have since been addressed [7]. It was concluded that the modulation of the endothelin pathway provided an explanation of the mechanisms by which BM caused an increase in cardiovascular events in participants. It was also found that BM was able to suppress the endothelin pathway in the kidneys of chronic kidney disease (CKD)-induced rodents and healthy cynomolgus monkeys by reducing the protein expression of the ETA receptor [7]. In healthy cynomolgus monkeys, BM did not affect the ETB receptor expression [7]. However, in rodents induced with CKD, BM restored ETB receptor levels to those observed in the control animals [7]. Thus, these results are extremely important in trying to explain the detrimental cardiovascular events that occurred in a number of patients taking BM in this human clinical trial. Despite this, there are limitations in arriving at this conclusion because only the endothelin pathway of kidney tissue was examined and not the cardiac tissue.

It is well established that renal endothelin 1 (ET-1) has several important functions including regulating sodium and water homeostasis, renal blood flow and acid base balance via activation of ETA and ETB receptors [8] (Table 1). Furthermore, if the endothelin system is suppressed, such as from being targeted by BM, this balance is disturbed causing fluid retention, which can lead to heart failure [8]. However, it is important to note that the endothelin pathway in the heart has a different function with regard to the kidneys. ET-1 in the cardiac muscle promotes cardiac hypertrophy and subsequent heart failure via activation of ETA receptors [9] (table 1). Furthermore, both ETA receptor and combined ETA/ETB receptor antagonism have been shown to lower blood pressure and reduce the infarct size in patients with congestive heart failure [9]. Thus, suppressing the endothelin pathway in the heart would be protective against adverse cardiovascular vascular events.

In our opinion, due to the differing functions of the endothelin pathway in the kidneys and heart, we feel that more evidence is required to conclude that BM treatment causes adverse cardiovascular events by suppressing the renal endothelin pathway. Future investigation of the effects of BM on cardiac tissue is required in order to determine if BM inhibits ETA receptors in the heart causing its protection.

Van Laecke S, Van Biesen W, Vanholder R: The paradox of bardoxolone methyl: a call for every witness on the stand? Diabetes Obes Metab 2014. DOI: 10.1111/dom.12356 [Epub ahead of print].
Camer D, Yu Y, Szabo A, Huang XF: The molecular mechanisms underpinning the therapeutic properties of oleanolic acid, its isomer and derivatives for type 2 diabetes and associated complications. Mol Nutr Food Res 2014;58:1750-1759.
Pergola PE, Raskin P, Toto RD, Meyer CJ, Huff JW, Grossman EB, Krauth M, Ruiz S, Audhya P, Christ-Schmidt H, Wittes J, Warnock DG: Bardoxolone methyl and kidney function in CKD with type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med 2011;365:327-336.
Pergola PE, Krauth M, Huff JW, Ferguson DA, Ruiz S, Meyer CJ, Warnock DG: Effect of bardoxolone methyl on kidney function in patients with T2D and Stage 3b-4 CKD. Am J Nephrol 2011;33:469-476.
de Zeeuw D, Akizawa T, Agarwal R, Audhya P, Bakris GL, Chin M, Krauth M, Lambers Heerspink HJ, Meyer CJ, McMurray JJ, Parving HH, Pergola PE, Remuzzi G, Toto RD, Vaziri ND, Wanner C, Warnock DG, Wittes J, Chertow GM: Rationale and trial design of Bardoxolone Methyl Evaluation in Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease and Type 2 Diabetes: the Occurrence of Renal Events (BEACON). Am J Nephrol 2013;37:212-222.
de Zeeuw D, Akizawa T, Audhya P, Bakris GL, Chin M, Christ-Schmidt H, Goldsberry A, Houser M, Krauth M, Lambers Heerspink HJ, McMurray JJ, Meyer CJ, Parving HH, Remuzzi G, Toto RD, Vaziri ND, Wanner C, Wittes J, Wrolstad D, Chertow GM: Bardoxolone methyl in type 2 diabetes and stage 4 chronic kidney disease. N Engl J Med 2013;369:2492-2503.
Chin MP, Reisman SA, Bakris GL, O'Grady M, Linde PG, McCullough PA, Packham D, Vaziri ND, Ward KW, Warnock DG, Meyer CJ: Mechanisms contributing to adverse cardiovascular events in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and stage 4 chronic kidney disease treated with bardoxolone methyl. Am J Nephrol 2014;39:499-508.
Kohan DE: The renal medullary endothelin system in control of sodium and water excretion and systemic blood pressure. Curr Opin Nephrol Hypertens 2006;15:34-40.
Nasser SA, El-Mas MM: Endothelin ETA receptor antagonism in cardiovascular disease. Eur J Pharmacol 2014;737:210-213.
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.