The protein-creatinine ratio was measured in urine samples obtained at three different times of the day and compared to the 24-hour protein excretion in 51 patients with a wide spectrum of renal function and proteinuria. A linear correlation, which was highly significant, was found between the two variables. The higher correlation was found in urine samples obtained at 08.00 and at 12.00 h and the lowest in samples obtained at 16.00 h. This correlation did not depend on the degree of proteinuria or on the sex of the patients, but was slightly dependent on the glomerular filtration rate. The protein-creatinine ratio was essentially identical with the 24-hour protein excretion. Thus, the normal range of proteinuria was represented by a ratio of less than 0.2, while nephrotic patients had a ratio above 3.5. We suggest that the protein-creatinine ratio in random urine samples could replace the timed collection methods at least for follow-up and screening.

Keywords:
Proteinuria, Protein-creatinine ratio
This content is only available via PDF.
© 1988 S. Karger AG, Basel
1988
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.