Background/Aims: Physician characteristics are associated with differential performance on quality measures and patient outcomes in several medical fields. We aimed to determine whether characteristics of physicians who provide care to dialysis patients were associated with patient outcomes. Methods: This cohort study used United States Renal Data System data for patients who initiated in-center hemodialysis between October 1, 2003, and September 30, 2006 (n = 91,276). Patient characteristics were defined and physicians identified from Part B Medicare claims for outpatient dialysis services submitted during months 4-6 of hemodialysis. Physician characteristics were obtained from the American Medical Association Physician Master File. Associations of physician characteristics with 1-year patient mortality and first hospitalization were determined using Cox proportional hazards analysis; associations with quality of care (defined by influenza vaccination and waitlisting for kidney transplant) were determined using logistic regression. Results: Physician characteristics were not associated with patient mortality. After adjustment for patient and other provider characteristics, patients whose physicians had practiced longer or were in administrative, research, or teaching practices were more likely to be hospitalized; patients whose providers practiced in smaller metropolitan statistical areas (MSAs) were less likely. More years since training was associated with greater chance of waitlisting, and practicing in smaller MSAs with less chance. Graduation from a foreign medical school, practicing in smaller MSAs, and travelling farther from office to dialysis unit were associated with greater odds of influenza vaccination. Conclusions: Several characteristics of physicians seeing incident outpatient hemodialysis patients were associated with hospitalization and quality of care, but none with mortality.

1.
Reid RO, Friedberg MW, Adams JL, McGlynn EA, Mehrotra A: Associations between physician characteristics and quality of care. Arch Intern Med 2010;170:1442-1449.
2.
Choudhry NK, Fletcher RH, Soumerai SB: Systematic review: the relationship between clinical experience and quality of health care. Ann Intern Med 2005;142:260-273.
3.
Pham HH, Schrag D, Hargraves JL, Bach PB: Delivery of preventive services to older adults by primary care physicians. JAMA 2005;294:473-481.
4.
Ko DT, Austin PC, Chan BT, Tu JV: Quality of care of international and Canadian medical graduates in acute myocardial infarction. Arch Intern Med 2005;165:458-463.
5.
Norcini JJ, Kimball HR, Lipner RS: Certification and specialization: do they matter in the outcome of acute myocardial infarction? Acad Med 2000;75:1193-1198.
6.
Chen J, Radford MJ, Wang Y, Krumholz HM: Care and outcomes of elderly patients with acute myocardial infarction by physician specialty: the effects of comorbidity and functional limitations. Am J Med 2000;108:460-469.
7.
Frances CD, Go AS, Dauterman KW, Deosaransingh K, Jung DL, Gettner S, Newman JM, Massie BM, Browner WS: Outcome following acute myocardial infarction: are differences among physician specialties the result of quality of care or case mix? Arch Intern Med 1999;159:1429-1436.
8.
O'Neill L, Lanska DJ, Hartz A: Surgeon characteristics associated with mortality and morbidity following carotid endarterectomy. Neurology 2000;55:773-781.
9.
Harley KT, Streja E, Rhee CM, Molnar MZ, Kovesdy CP, Amin AN, Kalantar-Zadeh K: Nephrologist caseload and hemodialysis patient survival in an urban cohort. J Am Soc Nephrol 2013;24:1678-1687.
10.
US Renal Data System. Researcher's Guide to the USRDS Database: 2009 ADR Edition. National Institutes of Health, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases. http://www.usrds.org/2009/fb/index_rg.html (accessed March 14, 2014).
11.
Liu J, Huang Z, Gilbertson DT, Foley RN, Collins AJ: An improved comorbidity index for outcome analyses among dialysis patients. Kidney Int 2010;77:141-151.
12.
Ward MM: Socioeconomic status and the incidence of ESRD. Am J Kidney Dis 2008;51:563-572.
13.
US Census Bureau. US Census Bureau Data Set. 2000. http://www.census.gov/main/www/cen2000.html (accessed March 14, 2014).
14.
Hartz AJ, Kuhn EM, Pulido J: Prestige of training programs and experience of bypass surgeons as factors in adjusted patient mortality rates. Med Care 1999;37:93-103.
15.
Birkmeyer JD, Stukel TA, Siewers AE, Goodney PP, Wennberg DE, Lucas FL: Surgeon volume and operative mortality in the United States. N Engl J Med 2003;349:2117-2127.
16.
Davidson W, Molloy DW, Bedard M: Physician characteristics and prescribing for elderly people in New Brunswick: relation to patient outcomes. CMAJ 1995;152:1227-1234.
17.
Aubin M, Vezina L, Fortin JP, Bernard PM: Effectiveness of a program to improve hypertension screening in primary care. CMAJ 1994;150:509-515.
18.
Czaja R, McFall SL, Warnecke RB, Ford L, Kaluzny AD: Preferences of community physicians for cancer screening guidelines. Ann Intern Med 1994;120:602-608.
19.
Ayanian JZ, Hauptman PJ, Guadagnoli E, Antman EM, Pashos CL, McNeil BJ: Knowledge and practices of generalist and specialist physicians regarding drug therapy for acute myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med 1994;331:1136-1142.
20.
Streja DA, Rabkin SW: Factors associated with implementation of preventive care measures in patients with diabetes mellitus. Arch Intern Med 1999;159:294-302.
21.
Tonelli M, Klarenbach S, Rose C, Wiebe N, Gill J: Access to kidney transplantation among remote- and rural-dwelling patients with kidney failure in the United States. JAMA 2009;301:1681-1690.
22.
Maripuri S, Arbogast P, Ikizler TA, Cavanaugh KL: Rural and micropolitan residence and mortality in patients on dialysis. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2012;7:1121-1129.
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.