Background: Medullary sponge kidney (MSK) is characterized by malformation of the terminal collecting ducts and is associated with an increased risk of nephrolithiasis, nephrocalcinosis, urinary tract infections, renal acidification defects, and reduced bone density. It has been historically diagnosed with intravenous pyelography (IVP), which is falling out of favor as an imaging modality. CT urography (CTU) performed with multidetector CT (MDCT) has been shown to create images of the renal collecting system with similar detail as IVP; however, its utility in diagnosing MSK has not been defined. Case Report: We present the first 15 patients with recurrent symptomatic nephrolithiasis who were evaluated in our renal stone clinic with CTU. Four patients were diagnosed with MSK after visualization of the characteristic radiologic findings. Discussion: CTU effectively demonstrates the characteristic radiologic findings of MSK including collecting tubule dilatation, medullary nephrocalcinosis, nephrolithiasis, and medullary cysts. Dose reduction protocols can reduce radiation exposure below that associated with conventional IVP. We propose CTU be considered for the diagnosis of MSK.

Keywords:
Medullary sponge kidney, CT urography, Kidney stone
1.
Lindvall N: Roentgenologic diagnosis of medullary sponge kidney. Acta Radiol 1959;51:193-206.
2.
McPhail EF, Gettman MT, Patterson DE, Rangel LJ, Krambeck AE: Nephrolithiasis in medullary sponge kidney: evaluation of clinical and metabolic features. Urology 2012;79:277-281.
3.
Gambaro G, Favaro S, D'Angelo A: Risk for renal failure in nephrolithiasis. Am J Kidney Dis 2001;37:233-243.
4.
Feest TG: Medullary sponge kidney: abnormalities of renal tubular and glomerular function, and their relationship to clinical features. Proc Eur Dial Transplant Assoc 1977;14:511-517.
5.
Fabris A, Bernich P, Abaterusso C, Marchionna N, Canciani C, Nouvenne A, Zamboni M, Lupo A, Gambaro G: Bone disease in medullary sponge kidney and effect of potassium citrate treatment. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2009;4:1974-1979.
6.
Higashihara E, Nutahara K, Tago K, Ueno A, Niijima T: Medullary sponge kidney and renal acidification defect. Kidney Int 1984;25:453-459.
7.
Sluysmans T, Vanoverschelde JP, Malvaux P: Growth failure associated with medullary sponge kidney, due to incomplete renal tubular acidosis type 1. Eur J Pediatr 1987;146:78-80.
8.
Fabris A, Lupo A, Ferraro PM, Anglani F, Pei Y, Danza FM, Gambaro G: Familial clustering of medullary sponge kidney is autosomal dominant with reduced penetrance and variable expressivity. Kidney Int 2013;83:272-277.
9.
Fabris A, Anglani F, Lupo A, Gambaro G: Medullary sponge kidney: state of the art. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2013;28:1111-1119.
10.
Torregrossa R, Anglani F, Fabris A, Gozzini A, Tanini A, Del Prete D, Cristofaro R, Artifoni L, Abaterusso C, Marchionna N, Lupo A, D'Angelo A, Gambaro G: Identification of GDNF gene sequence variations in patients with medullary sponge kidney disease. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2010;5:1205-1210.
11.
Laube M, Hess B, Terrier F, Vock P, Jaeger P: Prevalence of medullary sponge kidney in patients with and without nephrolithiasis (in German). Praxis (Bern 1994) 1995;84:1224-1230.
12.
Parks JH, Coe FL, Strauss AL: Calcium nephrolithiasis and medullary sponge kidney in women. N Engl J Med 1982;306:1088-1091.
13.
Fabris A, Lupo A, Bernich P, Abaterusso C, Marchionna N, Nouvenne A, Gambaro G: Long-term treatment with potassium citrate and renal stones in medullary sponge kidney. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2010;5:1663-1668.
14.
Yagisawa T, Kobayashi C, Hayashi T, Yoshida A, Toma H: Contributory metabolic factors in the development of nephrolithiasis in patients with medullary sponge kidney. Am J Kidney Dis 2001;37:1140-1143.
15.
Lang EK, Macchia RJ, Thomas R, Watson RA, Marberger M, Lechner G, Gayle B, Richter F: Improved detection of renal pathologic features on multiphasic helical CT compared with IVU in patients presenting with microscopic hematuria. Urology 2003;61:528-532.
16.
Gambaro G, Danza FM, Fabris A: Medullary sponge kidney. Curr Opin Nephrol Hypertens 2013;22:421-426.
17.
Ginalski JM, Spiegel T, Jaeger P: Use of low-osmolality contrast medium does not increase prevalence of medullary sponge kidney. Radiology 1992;182:311-314.
18.
Sourtzis S, Thibeau JF, Damry N, Raslan A, Vandendris M, Bellemans M: Radiologic investigation of renal colic: unenhanced helical CT compared with excretory urography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1999;172:1491-1494.
19.
Franco A, Tomas M, Alonso-Burgos A: Intravenous urography is died. Long live the computerized tomography (in Spanish)! Actas Urol Esp 2010;34:764-774.
20.
Ginalski JM, Schnyder P, Portmann L, Jaeger P: Medullary sponge kidney on axial computed tomography: comparison with excretory urography. Eur J Radiol 1991;12:104-107.
21.
Hida T, Nishie A, Asayama Y, Ishigami K, Fujita N, Inokuchi J, Naito S, Ando S, Honda H: MR imaging of focal medullary sponge kidney: case report. Magn Res Med Sci 2012;11:65-69.
22.
Stratta P, Fenoglio R, Quaglia M, Lazzarich E, Airoldi A: The missing medullary sponge kidney. Kidney Int 2009;76:459-460, author reply 460.
23.
Maw AM, Megibow AJ, Grasso M, Goldfarb DS: Diagnosis of medullary sponge kidney by computed tomographic urography. Am J Kidney Dis 2007;50:146-150.
24.
Forster JA, Taylor J, Browning AJ, Biyani CS: A review of the natural progression of medullary sponge kidney and a novel grading system based on intravenous urography findings. Urol Int 2007;78:264-269.
25.
Van Der Molen AJ, Cowan NC, Mueller-Lisse UG, Nolte-Ernsting CC, Takahashi S, Cohan RH; CT Urography Working Group of the European Society of Urogenital Radiology (ESUR): CT urography: definition, indications and techniques. A guideline for clinical practice. Eur Radiol 2008;18:4-17.
26.
Nawfel RD, Judy PF, Schleipman AR, Silverman SG: Patient radiation dose at CT urography and conventional urography. Radiology 2004;232:126-132.
27.
Spielmann AL, Heneghan JP, Lee LJ, Yoshizumi T, Nelson RC: Decreasing the radiation dose for renal stone CT: a feasibility study of single- and multidetector CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2002;178:1058-1062.
28.
Juri H, Matsuki M, Itou Y, Inada Y, Nakai G, Azuma H, Narumi Y: Initial experience with adaptive iterative dose reduction 3D to reduce radiation dose in computed tomographic urography. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2013;37:52-57.
29.
Takeuchi M, Kawai T, Ito M, Ogawa M, Ohashi K, Hara M, Shibamoto Y: Split-bolus CT-urography using dual-energy CT: feasibility, image quality and dose reduction. Eur J Radiol 2012;81:3160-3165.
30.
Lee S, Jung SE, Rha SE, Byun JY: Reducing radiation in CT urography for hematuria: effect of using 100 kilovoltage protocol. Eur J Radiol 2012;81:e830-e834.
31.
Dahlman P, van der Molen AJ, Magnusson M, Magnusson A: How much dose can be saved in three-phase CT urography? A combination of normal-dose corticomedullary phase with low-dose unenhanced and excretory phases. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2012;199:852-860.
© 2014 S. Karger AG, Basel
2014
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.