Background/Aims: To improve procedural skill competence in real-time ultrasound-guided renal biopsy, we have developed an inexpensive simulation tool (a porcine kidney inserted under a turkey breast) that mimics biopsy conditions in human patients in terms of kidney size, depth, echogenicity and overall structural characteristics. This study investigated the utility of this simulation tool for improving trainees’ confidence in performing renal biopsy and biop- sy-associated bleeding complications. Methods: We have quantitatively assessed the confidence level of renal fellows before and after their initial renal biopsy simulation training. Subsequently, we determined the effect of this simulation training on trainees’ procedural competence by comparing outcomes of clinical renal biopsies performed by fellows that did versus those who did not participate in the simulation training. Results: We show that renal biopsy simulation has improved the confidence level of trainees (23.4 presimulation to 70.3 postsimulation on a 0–100 scale; p = 0.001; η2 = 0.69). The improvement in trainees’ confidence did not vary across their prior experience performing renal biopsies (η2 = 0.23; p = 0.060). Additionally, fellows who participated in the simulation training demonstrated improved competence in performing the renal biopsy procedure in patients. Successful retrieval of renal tissue per pass was 94% (vs. 73% in fellows who did not participate in this simulation training; p = 0.002) and procedure-related blood loss was reduced as indicated by smaller postbiopsy versus prebiopsy hematocrit decline (1.18 vs. 2.68; p = 0.049). Conclusion: Renal biopsy simulation training may improve trainees’ confidence and reduce the severity of biopsy-associated bleeding complications in patients.

Keywords:
Kidney biopsy, Training, Model, Bleeding complications
1.
Albani JM, Lee DI: Virtual reality-assisted robotic surgery simulation. J Endourol Endourol Soc 2007;21:285–287.
2.
Seymour NE, Gallagher AG, Roman SA, O’Brien MK, Bansal VK, Andersen DK, Satava RM: Virtual reality training improves operating room performance: results of a randomized, double-blinded study. Ann Surg 2002;236:458–463; discussion 463–454.
3.
Uccelli, J, Kahol, K, Ashby, A, Smith, M, Ferrara, J: The validity of take-home surgical simulators to enhance resident technical skill proficiency. Am J Surg 2011;201:315–319; discussion 319.
4.
Gurusamy K, Aggarwal R, Palanivelu L, Davidson BR: Systematic review of randomized controlled trials on the effectiveness of virtual reality training for laparoscopic surgery. Br J Surg 2008;95:1088–1097.
5.
Winters W, McDonald R, Krauter L: The detection of murine autosomal recessive polycystic kidney disease using real-time ultrasound. Pediatr Nephrol 1997;11:337–338.
6.
Mackinnon B, Fraser E, Simpson K, Fox JG, Geddes C: Is it necessary to stop antiplatelet agents before a native renal biopsy? Nephrol Dial Transplant 2008;23:3566–3570.
7.
Mackinnon B, McKinlay J, McQuarrie E, Geddes C: Early ultrasound to detect complications after renal biopsy. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2010;25:316–317.
8.
Waldo, B, Korbet, SM, Freimanis, MG, Lewis, EJ: The value of post-biopsy ultrasound in predicting complications after percutaneous renal biopsy of native kidneys. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2009;24:2433–2439.
9.
Mrug M, Bissler JJ: Simulation of real-time ultrasound-guided renal biopsy. Kidney Int 2010;78:705–707.
10.
McGaghie WC, Issenberg SB, Cohen ER, Barsuk JH, Wayne DB: Does simulation-based medical education with deliberate practice yield better results than traditional clinical education? A meta-analytic comparative review of the evidence. Acad Med 2011;86:706–711.
11.
Byrne AJ, Blagrove MT, McDougall SJP: Dynamic confidence during simulated clinical tasks. Postgrad Med J 2005;81:785–788.
12.
Coy K, McDougall H, Sneed M: Issues regarding practical validity and gender bias of the Perceptual Abilities Test (PAT). J Dent Educ 2003;67:31–37.
© 2012 S. Karger AG, Basel
2012
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.