Abstract
Gender inequity in access to hemodialysis and kidney transplantation has created a public health crisis in the US. Women have a lower chance of receiving hemodialysis and kidney transplant than men, but they constitute the majority of living kidney donors. Research has shown that economic factors such as greater income of men may encourage females to be donors; while gender-bias on part of physicians or institutions, lack of social support networks and differences in health-seeking behaviors compared to men are cited as reasons for this imbalance. We suggest various strategies to improve participation of women in the transplant process by education; raising awareness by publishing gender-specific data for dialysis and transplant centers; education and workshops to eliminate gender-bias within institutions and health-care providers and establishment of gender-specific support groups. Transplant teams that are more sensitive to the social complexities of women’s lives may lead to increased understanding of the effects of renal disease and indicate measures that need to be in place in order to address this gender disparity in the treatment of renal failure. Research needs to be done to elucidate the underlying medical, societal or psychological processes that lead to gender bias in the field of kidney transplantation.
References
1.
McCauley J, Irish W, Thompson L, et al: Factors determining the rate of referral, transplantation, and survival on dialysis in women with end-stage renal disease. Am J Kidney Dis 1997;30:739–748.
2.
Powe NR, Boulware LE: The uneven distribution of kidney transplants: Getting at the root causes and improving care. Am J Kidney Dis 2002;40:861–863.
3.
Boulware LE, Ratner LE, Sosa JA, Cooper LA, LaVeist TA, Powe NR: Determinants of willingness to donate living related and cadaveric organs: Identifying opportunities for intervention. Transplantation 2002;73:1683–1691.
4.
Khajehdehi P: Living nonrelated versus related renal transplantation, its relationship to the social status, age and gender of recipients and donors. Nephrol Dial Transplant 1999;14:2621.
5.
Meier-Kriesche HU, Ojo AO, Leavy SF, et al: Gender differences in the risk for chronic renal allograft failure. Transplantation 2001;71:429–432.
6.
Baines LS, Zawada ET Jr, Jindal RM: Psychosocial profiling: a holistic management tool for noncompliance. Clin Transplant 2005;19:38–44.
7.
Garg PP, Diener-West M, Powe NR: Reducing racial disparities in transplant activation: whom should we target? Am J Kidney Dis 2001;37:921–931.
8.
Norcross WA, Ramirez C, Palinkas LA: The influence of women on the health care-seeking behavior of men. J Fam Pract 1996;43:475–480.
9.
Dong W, Ben-Shlomo Y, Colhoun H, Chaturvedi N: Gender differences in accessing cardiac surgery across England: A cross-sectional analysis of the health survey for England. Soc Sci Med 1998;47:1773–1780.
10.
Young L, Little M: Women and heart transplantation: an issue of gender equity? Health Care Women Int 2004;25:436–453.
11.
Aaronson KD, Schwartz S, Goin JE, Mancini DM: Sex differences in patient acceptance of cardiac transplant candidacy. Circulation 1995;91:2753–2761.
12.
Soucie JM, Neylan JF, McClellan W: Race and sex differences in the identification of candidates for renal transplantation. Am J Kidney Dis 1992;19:414–419.
13.
Kjellstrand CM: Age, sex, and race inequality in renal transplantation. Arch Intern Med 1988;148:1305–1309.
14.
Held P, Pauly M, Bovbjerg R, Newmann J, Salvatierra O: Access to kidney transplantation: Has the United States eliminated income and racial differences? Arch Intern Med 1988;148:2594–2600.
15.
Gaylin DS, Held PJ, Port FK, et al: The impact of comorbid and sociodemographic factors on access to renal transplantation. JAMA 1993;269:603–608.
16.
Ojo A, Port FK: Influence of race and gender on related donor renal transplantation rates: Am J Kidney Dis 1993;22:835–841.
17.
Bloembergen WE, Port FK, Mauger EA, Briggs JP, Leichtman AB: Gender discrepancies in living related renal transplant donors and recipients. J Am Soc Nephrol 1996;7:1139–1144.
18.
Bloembergen WE, Mauger EA, Wolfe RA, Port FK: Association of gender and access to cadaveric renal transplantation. Am J Kidney Dis 1997;30:733–738.
19.
Garg PP, Furth SL, Fivush BA, Powe NR: Impact of gender on access to the renal transplant waiting list for pediatric and adult patients. J Am Soc Nephrol 2000;11:958–964.
20.
Nyberg G, Blohme I, Norden G: Gender differences in a kidney transplant population. Nephrol Dial Transplant 1997;12:559–563.
21.
Schaubel D, Stewart D, Morrison H, et al: Sex inequality in kidney transplantation rates. Arch Intern Med 2000;160:2349–2354.
22.
Alexander GC, Sehgal AR: Barriers to cadaveric renal transplantation among blacks, women, and the poor. JAMA 1998;280:1148–1152.
23.
Avula S, Sharma RK, Singh AK, et al: Age and gender discrepancies in living related renal transplant donors and recipients. Transplant Proc 1998;30:3674.
24.
Wolfe RA, Ashby VB, Milford EL, et al: Differences in access to cadaveric renal transplantation in the United States. Am J Kidney Dis 2000;36:1025–1033.
25.
Alexander GC, Sehgal AR: Variation in access to kidney transplantation across dialysis facilities: Using process of care measures for quality improvement. Am J Kidney Dis 2002;40:824–831.
26.
Kayler LK, Meier-Kriesche HU, Punch JD, et al: Gender imbalance in living donor renal transplantation. Transplantation 2002;73:248–252.
27.
Zimmerman D, Donnelly S, Miller J, Stewart D, Albert S: Gender disparity in living renal transplant donation. Am J Kidney Dis 2000;36:534–540.
28.
Kayler LK, Rasmussen CS, Dykstra DM, et al: Gender imbalance and outcomes in living donor renal transplantation in the United States. Am J Transplant 2003;3:452–458.
29.
Boulware LE, Ratner LE, Cooper LA, Sosa JA, LaVeist TA, Powe NR: Understanding disparities in donor behavior: race and gender differences in willingness to donate blood and cadaveric organs. Med Care 2002;40:85–95.
30.
Oh C-K, Kim SJ, Kim JH, Shin GT, Kim HS: Influence of donor and recipient gender on early graft function after living donor kidney transplantation. Transplant Proc 2004;36:2015–2017.
31.
Kwon OJ, Kwak JY: The impact of sex and age matching for long-term graft survival in living donor renal transplantation. Transplant Proc 2004;36:2040–2042.
32.
Zeier M, Dohler B, Opelz G, Ritz E: The effect of donor gender on graft survival. J Am Soc Nephrol 2002;13:2570–2576.
33.
Vereerstraeten P, Wissing M, De Pauw L, Abramowicz D, Kinnaert P: Male recipients of kidney from female donors are at increased risk of graft loss from both rejection and technical failure. Clin Transplant 1999;13:181–186.
34.
Meier-Kriesche HU, Ojo AO, Leavey SF, et al: Gender differences in the risk for chronic renal allograft failure. Transplantation 2001;71:429–432.
35.
Johnson CD, Wicks MN, Milstead J, Hartwig M, Hathaway DK: Racial and gender differences in quality of life following kidney transplantation. J Nurs Sch 1998;30:125–130.
36.
Busson M Beniot G: Is matching for sex and age beneficial to kidney graft survival? Clin Transplant 1997;11:15–18.
37.
Sesso R, Whelton PK, Klag MJ: Effect of age and gender on kidney function in renal transplant donors: a prospective study. Clin Nephrol 1993;40:31–37.
38.
Reed E, Cohen DJ, Barr ML, et al: Effect of recipient gender and race on heart and kidney allograft survival. Transplant Proc 1992;24:2670–2671.
39.
Koka P, Cecka JM: Sex and age effects in renal transplantation; in Terasaki P (ed): Clin Transplant. Los Angeles, UCLA Tissue Typing Laboratory, 1990, pp 437–446.
40.
Zhou YC, Cecka JM: Effect of sex on kidney transplants; in Terasaki P (ed): Clin Transplant. Los Angeles, UCLA Tissue Typing Laboratory, 1989, pp 361–367.
41.
Shibue T, Kondo K, Iwaki Y, Terasaki PI: Effect of sex on kidney transplants; in Terasaki P (ed): Clin Transplant. Los Angeles, UCLA Tissue Typing Laboratory, 1987, pp 351–360.
42.
Kenneally P: The impact of sex on kidney transplantation; in Terasaki P (ed): Clin Transplant. Los Angeles, UCLA Tissue Typing Laboratory, 1985, pp 147–152.
43.
Neugarten J, Srinivas T, Tellis V, Silbiger S, Greenstein S: The effect of donor gender on renal allograft survival. J Am Soc Nephrol 1996;7:318–324.
44.
Gutierrez-Lobos K, Wolfl G, Scherer M, Anderer P, Schmidl-Mohl B: The gender gap in depression reconsidered: the influence of marital and employment status on the female/male ratio of treated incidence rates. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 2000;35:202–210.
45.
Rush H, Neugarten J, Coco M: Women’s health issues in a dialysis population. Clin Nephrol 2000;54:455.
46.
Briscoe ME: Why do people go to the doctor? Sex differences in the correlated of GP consultation. Soc Sci Med 1987;25:507–513.
47.
Caress AL, Luker KA, Owens RG: A descriptive study of the meaning of illness in chronic renal disease. J Adv Nurs 2001;33:716.
48.
Baines LS, Jindal RM: The struggle for life: A psychological perspective of kidney disease and transplantation. Praeger Series in Health Psychology, Conn., 2003.
49.
Arthur T: The role of social networks: A novel hypothesis to explain the phenomenon of racial disparity in kidney transplantation. Am J Kidney Dis 2002;40:678–681.
50.
Kutner NG: Social ties, social support and perceived health status among chronically disabled people. Soc Sci Med 1987;25:29.
51.
Hunt K, Ford G, Harkins L, Wyke S: Are women more ready to consult than men? Gender difference in family practitioner consultation for common chronic conditions. J Health Serv Res Policy 1999;4:96–100.
52.
Crawford BM, Meana M, Stewart D, Cheung AM: Treatment decision making in mature adults: Gender differences. Health Care for Women Int 2000;21:91–104.
53.
Latham CE: Obstacles to achieving adequate dialysis dose: Compliance, education, transportation, and reimbursement. Am J Kidney Dis 1998;32:93.
54.
Rocco MJ, Burkart JM: Prevalence of missed treatments and early sign-offs in hemodialysis patients. J Am Soc Nephrol 1993;4:1178–1183.
55.
Yuge J, Cecka JM: Sex and age effects in renal transplantation; in Terasaki P (ed): Clin Transplant. Los Angeles, UCLA Tissue Typing Laboratory, 1991, pp 1–257.
56.
Wolfe RA, Ashby VB, Milford EL, et al: Differences in access to cadaveric renal transplantation in the United States. Am J Kidney Dis 2000;36:1025–1033.
57.
Bloembergen WE, Port FK, Mauger EA, Wolfe RA: Causes of death in dialysis patients: Racial and gender differences. J Am Soc Nephrol 1994;5:1231–1242.
58.
Sehgal AR: Outcomes of renal replacement therapy among blacks and women. Am J Kidney Dis 2000;35:S148–S152.
59.
Hirth RA, Turenne MN, Woods JD, et al: Predictors of type of vascular access in hemodialysis patients. JAMA 1996;276:1303–1308.
60.
Baines LS, Joseph JT, Jindal RM: Prospective randomised study of individual and group psychotherapy versus controls in recipients of renal transplants. Kidney Int 2004;65:1937–1942.
61.
Callender CO, Maddox G: Three decades of overcoming the African-American donation disparity. Nephrol News Issues 2004;18:39–40.
62.
Baines LS, Joseph JT, Jindal RM: A public forum to promote organ donation amongst Asians: A Scottish initiative. Transplant Int 2002;15:124–131.
63.
http://www.doh.state.fl.us/mqa/medical/me_home.html (accessed 2/10/2005).
64.
Mechanic D: Sex, illness behavior, and the use of health services: Soc Science Med 1978;12B:207–214.
65.
Sehgal AR: Outcomes of renal replacement therapy among blacks and women. Am J Kidney Dis 2000;35(suppl 4):S148–S152.
66.
Bergelson BA, Tommaso CL: Gender differences in clinical evaluations and triage in coronary artery disease. Chest 1995;108:1510–1513.
67.
Khan SS, Nessim S, Gray R, Czer LS, Chaux A, Matloff J: Increased mortality of women in coronary artery bypass surgery: Evidence for referral bias. Ann Intern Med 1990;112:561–567.
© 2005 S. Karger AG, Basel
2005
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.
