Sources of variation in cardiac output determined by the first-passage radionuclide technique were evaluated in 30 patients with coronary artery disease. In 12 fasting patients the standard deviations of differences in cardiac output measured three times with 1-hour intervals were 0.77 and 0.93 liters/min. No systematic variation was evident. An 8 % reduction was demonstrated in cardiac output measured in 18 patients at 2-day intervals (p <0.01), possibly due to anxiety or discomfort at the first examination. The standard deviation of the day-to-day differences was 0.61 liters/min and thus not higher than that of the hour-to-hour differences. The standard deviation of differences between two-observer analysis was 0.34 liters/min, and a small difference of 3.7% was statistically significant (p < 0.05). No significant intraobserver variation was found. Intraobserver differences had standard deviations of 0.34 and 0.48 liters/min. In patients with coronary artery disease, the first-passage radionuclide cardiac output accordingly varies considerably over time, but the precision of this technique is high.

This content is only available via PDF.
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.