The ability of artériographie, electrocardiographic, and physiologic indices of exercise testing to predict the reversibility of the persistent defect visualized on poststress and early (2-4 h) thallium-201 redistribution imaging was assessed in 35 consecutive patients who had arteriography within 6 months of their scintigraphic study. Postexercise, early, and late (24-72 h) redistribution images were scored on a scale of 0-3. Moderate to complete late redistribution(scores 2 and 3) was found in 23 (66%) patients (group I). Of these patients in group I, 19 had no significant early redistribution (group IA). There was little or no late redistribution (0-1) in 12 patients (group II). Late redistribution of thallium-201 in persistent myocardial defects was prevalent in the culprit vascular distribution in patients with Q wave myocardial infarction, but was more prevalent in patients without the presence of Q waves on the electrocardiogram. No difference was found between groups I and II, respectively, in exercise time, angina pectoris on exertion, rate-pressure product, ischemic electrocardiographic changes, and number of coronary vessels with > 50% luminal narrowing. The degree of stenosis of the culprit artery did not correlate with the presence of late redistribution. Except for a trend in group IA patients to have more frequent angina pectoris on exertion, similar results were obtained comparing group IA with group II. We conclude that neither symptomatic, hemodynamic, and electrocardiographic variables of standard treadmill testing nor the degree of stenosis of the culprit coronary artery by coronary cineangiography can distinguish patients who manifest evidence of ischemia and viability by late-redistribution imaging of persistent myocardial defects following single-dose administration of thallium-201.

This content is only available via PDF.
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.