We recently published an article in Acta Haematologica (DOI: 10.1159/000510352) [1] wherein we compared safety and efficacy of G-CSF and GM-CSF therapy in persons with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) such as that associated with infection with severe acute respiratory syndrome-coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) and attendant coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19). We discussed differences between the drugs and suggested that in persons with lung infection and/or ARDS, GM-CSF may be safer than G-CSF because of its pleiotropic effects. There are now 2 publications emphasizing the potential danger of giving G-CSF to persons with COVID-19-related ARDS [2, 3]. Nawar and colleagues [2] reported 3 persons with ARDS in the setting of COVID-19 with rapid deterioration of lung function after receiving G-CSF. They attribute this finding to an influx of granulocytes into the inflamed lung concluding: In the setting of COVID-19 illness, further rapid rise in neutrophilia with NLR (neutrophil lymphocyte ratio) >5 may portend respiratory deterioration to the point of mechanical ventilation within the next 72 h, especially in those patients who are older than age 50 and have comorbid medical conditions. Taha and colleagues [3] report similar rapid deterioration in someone with COVID-19-related ARDS receiving G-CSF concluding: This rapid neutropenia recovery and the robust inflammatory response in COVID-19 raise concerns about G-CSF safety in patients with COVID-19.

We ended our article noting: In persons with lung infection and/or ARDS, GM-CSF may be a safer drug than G-CSF. Whether this is so can only be definitively answered in a randomized comparative trial. Unfortunately, such a trial is unlikely to be done and we may have to rely on indirect evidence of safety and efficacy, perhaps to the chagrin of North et al. [4], who advocate enhancing enrollment to clinical trials, especially during the pandemic. The articles we cite on use of G-CSF in this setting are perhaps a warning and the kind of indirect evidence needed.

R.P.G. acknowledges support from the National Institute of Health Research (NIHR) Biomedical Research Centre funding scheme.

H.M.L. has been a consultant for Partner Therapeutics, Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Seattle Genetics, AstraZeneca, Celgene/Bristol-Myers Squibb, and Actinium Pharmaceuticals. R.P.G. is consultant to: BeiGene Ltd., Kite Pharma Inc., Fusion Pharma LLC, LaJolla NanoMedical Inc., Mingsight Parmaceuticals Inc., and CStone Pharmaceuticals. Medical Director: FFF Enterprises Inc. Partner: Neopharm Ltd, AZACA Inc. Board of Directors: RakFond Foundation for Cancer Research Support. Scientific Advisory Board: Antegene Biotech LLC, StemRad Ltd.

1.
Lazarus
HM
,
Gale
RP
.
G-CSF and GM-CSF Are Different. Which One Is Better for COVID-19?
Acta Haematol
.
2020
Aug
;
13
:
1
4
.
[PubMed]
0001-5792
2.
Nawar
T
,
Morjaria
S
,
Kaltsas
A
,
Patel
D
,
Perez-Johnston
R
,
Daniyan
AF
, et al
Granulocyte-colony stimulating factor in COVID-19: is it stimulating more than just the bone marrow?
Am J Hematol
.
2020
Aug
;
95
(
8
):
E210
3
.
[PubMed]
0361-8609
3.
Taha
M
,
Sharma
A
,
Soubani
A
.
Clinical deterioration during neutropenia recovery after G-CSF therapy in patient with COVID-19
.
Respir Med Case Rep
.
2020
;
31
:
101231
.
[PubMed]
2213-0071
4.
North
CM
,
Dougan
ML
,
Sacks
CA
.
Improving clinical trial enrollment - In the Covid-19 era and beyond
.
N Engl J Med
.
2020
Oct
;
383
(
15
):
1406
8
.
[PubMed]
0028-4793
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.