Introduction: Central nervous system (CNS) involvement in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) can be successfully treated with intrathecal chemotherapy and carries debatable prognostic impact. However, patients with CNS involvement are commonly excluded from clinical trials at an unknown rate. We systematically evaluated exclusion criteria of AML clinical trials based on CNS involvement and determined associations with clinical trial characteristics. Methods: The National Institutes of Health Clinical Trials Registry was searched for interventional adult AML trials between 2012 and 2022 that were phase 1, 2, or 3 and relevant trial characteristics were extracted. Results: 1,270 trials were included in the analysis with 790 trials (62.1%) explicitly excluding CNS involvement. There was no significant change in rates of CNS exclusion over the past decade. CNS exclusion was higher in trials that included the non-transplant population compared to trials exclusive to the transplant population (66.9% vs. 43.8%, p < 0.01). Non-transplant trials were also more likely to exclude patients with a history of or ambiguous timing of CNS involvement (p < 0.01). Phase 3 trials were associated with more liberal definitions of CNS exclusion (history or ambiguous timing) as compared to phase 1 and 2 trials that had higher rates of excluding patients with only active CNS involvement (p < 0.01). Conclusion: A majority of AML clinical trials, particularly in the non-transplant setting, exclude patients with CNS involvement. Many of these trials, most notably phase 3 trials, exclude patients not only with active but also with any history of CNS involvement. Further research is needed to determine optimal management of these patients in order to increase representation in large clinical trials.

Journal Section:
Original Paper
Keywords:
Acute myeloid leukemia, Central nervous system, Clinical trials, Exclusion
1.
Castagnola C, Nozza A, Corso A, Bernasconi C. The value of combination therapy in adult acute myeloid leukemia with central nervous system involvement. Haematologica. 1997;82(5):577–80.
2.
Shihadeh F, Reed V, Faderl S, Medeiros LJ, Mazloom A, Hadziahmetovic M, et al. Cytogenetic profile of patients with acute myeloid leukemia and central nervous system disease. Cancer. 2012;118(1):112–7.
https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.26253
3.
Cheng C-L, Li C-C, Hou H-A, Fang W-Q, Chang C-H, Lin C-T, et al. Risk factors and clinical outcomes of acute myeloid leukaemia with central nervous system involvement in adults. BMC Cancer. 2015;15(1):344–10.
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-015-1376-9
4.
Rozovski U, Ohanian M, Ravandi F, Garcia-Manero G, Faderl S, Pierce S, et al. Incidence of and risk factors for involvement of the central nervous system in acute myeloid leukemia. Leuk Lymphoma. 2015;56(5):1392–7.
https://doi.org/10.3109/10428194.2014.953148
5.
Del Principe MI, Buccisano F, Soddu S, Maurillo L, Cefalo M, Piciocchi A, et al. Involvement of central nervous system in adult patients with acute myeloid leukemia: incidence and impact on outcome. Semin Hematol. 2018;55(4):209–14.
6.
Ganzel C, Lee J-W, Fernandez HF, Paietta EM, Luger SM, Lazarus HM, et al. CNS involvement in AML at diagnosis is rare and does not affect response or survival: data from 11 ECOG-ACRIN trials. Blood Adv. 2021;5(22):4560–8.
https://doi.org/10.1182/bloodadvances.2021004999
7.
Alakel N, Stölzel F, Mohr B, Kramer M, Oelschlägel U, Röllig C, et al. Symptomatic central nervous system involvement in adult patients with acute myeloid leukemia. Cancer Manag Res. 2017;9:97–102.
https://doi.org/10.2147/CMAR.S125259
8.
Aoki J, Ishiyama K, Taniguchi S, Fukuda T, Ohashi K, Ogawa H, et al. Outcome of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for acute myeloid leukemia patients with central nervous system involvement. Biol Blood Marrow Transpl. 2014;20(12):2029–33.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbmt.2014.09.001
9.
Bar M, Tong W, Othus M, Loeb KR, Estey EH. Central nervous system involvement in acute myeloid leukemia patients undergoing hematopoietic cell transplantation. Biol Blood Marrow Transpl. 2015;21(3):546–51.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbmt.2014.11.683
10.
Prem S, Atenafu EG, Avena J, Bautista R, Law A, Lam W, et al. Impact of central nervous system involvement in AML on outcomes after allotransplant and utility of pretransplant cerebrospinal fluid assessment. Eur J Haematol. 2019;103(5):483–90.
https://doi.org/10.1111/ejh.13314
11.
Sastow D, Riazat-Kesh YJ, Farina K, Feld J, Bar-Natan M, Keyzner A, et al. Central nervous system specific characteristics and outcomes in acute myeloid leukemia patients with neurologic involvement. Blood. 2022;140(Supplement 1):11618–20.
https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2022-157300
12.
Tatarian J, Byrd K, Male HJ, Lin TL. Central nervous system involvement in adult acute myeloid leukemia patients. Leuk Res. 2022;118:106882.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leukres.2022.106882
13.
Yáñez L, Sánchez-Escamilla M, Perales M-A. CAR T cell toxicity: current management and future directions. Hemasphere. 2019;3(2):e186.
https://doi.org/10.1097/HS9.0000000000000186
14.
Goebeler M-E, Bargou RC. T cell-engaging therapies: BiTEs and beyond. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2020;17(7):418–34.
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41571-020-0347-5
15.
Reman O, Pigneux A, Huguet F, Vey N, Delannoy A, Fegueux N, et al. Central nervous system involvement in adult acute lymphoblastic leukemia at diagnosis and/or at first relapse: results from the GET-LALA group. Leuk Res. 2008;32(11):1741–50.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leukres.2008.04.011
16.
Gökbuget N, Hartog C-M, Bassan R, Derigs H-G, Dombret H, Greil R, et al. Liposomal cytarabine is effective and tolerable in the treatment of central nervous system relapse of acute lymphoblastic leukemia and very aggressive lymphoma. Haematologica. 2011;96(2):238–44.
https://doi.org/10.3324/haematol.2010.028092
17.
Goekbuget N, Beck J, Brueggemann M, Burmeister T, Buss EC, Frickhofen N, et al. Moderate intensive chemotherapy including CNS-prophylaxis with liposomal cytarabine is feasible and effective in older patients with Ph-negative acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL): results of a prospective trial from the German Multicenter Study Group for Adult ALL (GMALL). Blood. 2012;120(21):1493.
https://doi.org/10.1182/blood.v120.21.1493.1493
18.
Sakura T, Hayakawa F, Sugiura I, Murayama T, Imai K, Usui N, et al. High-dose methotrexate therapy significantly improved survival of adult acute lymphoblastic leukemia: a phase III study by JALSG. Leukemia. 2018;32(3):626–32.
https://doi.org/10.1038/leu.2017.283
19.
Dunsmore KP, Winter SS, Devidas M, Wood BL, Esiashvili N, Chen Z, et al. Children’s Oncology Group AALL0434: a phase III randomized clinical trial testing nelarabine in newly diagnosed T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia. J Clin Oncol. 2020;38(28):3282–93.
https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.20.00256
20.
Porkka K, Koskenvesa P, Lundán T, Rimpiläinen J, Mustjoki S, Smykla R, et al. Dasatinib crosses the blood-brain barrier and is an efficient therapy for central nervous system Philadelphia chromosome: positive leukemia. Blood. 2008;112(4):1005–12.
https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2008-02-140665
21.
Paul S, Short NJ. Central nervous system involvement in adults with acute leukemia: diagnosis, prevention, and management. Curr Oncol Rep. 2022;24(4):427–36.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11912-022-01220-4
© 2023 S. Karger AG, Basel
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
2023
You do not currently have access to this content.