In order to assess the prognostic value of nephromegaly (kidney enlargement ≥ 2 SD from mean for age) in children at diagnosis of acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), kidney size was investigated by intravenous pyelogram (IP), according to the method of Eklöf and Ringertz, in 101 children diagnosed with ALL in the period of 1975-1983. In the same period 103 additional patients with ALL were not investigated with IP for logistical reasons. Characteristics at the diagnosis of ALL in the patients of the investigated and non-investigated (with IP) groups were quite similar and event-free-survival (EFS) curves superimposable. Eighty-nine (50 males and 39 females, median age 61 months) out of 101 patients underwent IP before starting any therapy and were evaluated in the study; 27 (30.3%) presented with nephromegaly (bilateral in 13 cases and unilateral in 14). With a median follow-up time of 14.4 years (range 11-19 years), the EFS at 15 years from diagnosis was 18.5% (SE 9.5) in the nephromegalic group and 48.4% (SE 6.4) in the non-nephromegalic group. The association of poorer EFS with nephromegaly was confirmed when the comparison was adjusted by white blood cell count and age at diagnosis in a Cox regression model. Nephromegaly at diagnosis of childhood ALL may have an independent prognostic value in patients treated with ‘not intensive’ protocols; however, this finding should be confirmed in patients treated uniformly with contemporary intensive protocols.

Keywords:
Acute lymphoblastic leukemia, Childhood leukemia, Nephromegaly, Prognostic factors
This content is only available via PDF.
© 1995 S. Karger AG, Basel
1995
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.