This study evaluates the sensitivity and positive predictive value of some of the morphological flags supplied by the Technicon H-1 haematological analyser to detect circulating blasts. A total of 1,269 venous blood samples from 91 paediatric patients diagnosed of acute leukaemia were analysed in the Technicon H-1. A conventional microscopic manual method was used for reference. The prevalence was 17.7% for the presence of blasts. The results showed that all samples with more than 5% blasts were detected by some WBC morphological flag: only 5 samples (2.2%) with less than 5% blasts showed no morphological flag. In most cases (86%), the flags observed were either the ‘Atyp’ flag or the ‘Blast’ flag or both simultaneously. The positive predictive value obtained by the ‘Blast’ flag for the true presence of blasts was 66.8%, and for the ‘Atyp’ flag 34.9%; it was 75.8% when both flags were present simultaneously. False positives were associated with postchemotherapy monocytosis or severe neutropenia.

Keywords:
Acute leukaemia, Leukaemic blasts, Automation, Automated detection, Technicon H-1
This content is only available via PDF.
© 1995 S. Karger AG, Basel
1995
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.