Glycosylated hemoglobin was determined by the thiobarbituric acid method in sickle cell anemia patients from the Eastern Province of Saudi Arabia. The level of glycosylated hemoglobin in a Saudi SS sample (4.36%, SD 0.83) is 90% of that of the sample of normals (4.85%, SD 0.51). This is in contrast with the reported value of glycosylated hemoglobin in an American Black SS sample (3.9%, SD 0.6), which is only 60% of that of the sample of normals (6.6%, SD 0.7). The fetal hemoglobin level in Saudi sickle cell patients was 12.03% (SD 4.84), which is significantly different from that of Americans of African origin at p = 0.001. There was no significant correlation (r = 0.236) between the percentages of glycosylated Hb and Hb F at the 10% confidence level. The reported positive relationship between the percentages of glycosylated Hb and Hb F in American Blacks seems to be valid in the Saudi population only up to the level of 10–12% of fetal hemoglobin. Above this threshold of Hb F no further alleviating effect is seen. The 2,3-diphosphoglycerate value in Saudi Hb SS adults was 21.7 μmol/g (SD 7.4) and accordingly only twice as high as that of normal individuals. The benign clinical course exhibited by Saudi sickle cell patients is reflected by the survival of the RBC as indexed by its content of glycosylated Hb and 2,3-diphosphoglycerate. Moreover 10–12% of fetal hemoglobin in the RBC seems sufficient to ameliorate the severity of this disease in patients from the Eastern Province of Saudi Arabia.

Keywords:
Glycosylated hemoglobin, Saudi Arabia, Sickle cell anemia
This content is only available via PDF.
© 1986 S. Karger AG, Basel
1986
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.