Objectives: PNH clones, also aptly called “escape clones,” are evidence of acquired immune-mediated bone marrow failure and have a high prevalence in patients with aplastic anemia (AA). Several studies have reported contradictory results regarding the impact of PNH clones on AA patients with immunosuppression treatment, and PNH clones have not been confirmed as positive predictors of response in the AA guidelines of the British Society for Standards in Haematology. Methods: We performed a meta-analysis to address this issue by searching for articles in PubMed, EMBASE, The Coch-rane Library, Web of Science, and ClinicalTrials.gov, and for abstracts from the annual meetings of the American Society of Hematology and the European Hematology Association. We included 1,236 participants from 11 cohort-controlled studies. Our primary outcome was the 6-month hematologic response with a secondary outcome of the mortality rate within 3 months. Results: A better response rate was observed in the PNH+ group than in the PNH– group (odds ratio [OR] 2.85; 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.17–3.75; p < 0.00001), and further subgroup analysis strengthened the outcome, with minor heterogeneity in non-Asian countries. In contrast, the early mortality was not significantly different between the PNH+ and PNH– groups (OR 0.54; 95% CI 0.26–1.10; p = 0.09). Conclusions: The meta-analysis suggested an evidence-based role for PNH clones in predicting a better response in AA patients with immunosuppression.

Keywords:
Aplastic anemia, Paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria, PNH clones, Immunosuppressive therapy, Response, Mortality, Systemic review, Meta-analysis
© 2020 S. Karger AG, Basel
2020
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.