Background: The International Prognostic Index (IPI) scoring system is the most widely used prognostic tool for diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL); however, it fails to consistently identify patients with poor outcomes. This retrospective study was undertaken to confirm the clinical value of a new prognostic score and compare it with the IPI. Methods: The aim of this single-center study was to confirm the clinical value of a new prognostic score and its association with various clinical features, disease progression, and death in 70 patients with DLBCL who had undergone at least 6 cycles of chemotherapy. Results: The IPI and the new prognostic index were both associated with 3-year mortality (p ≤ 0.032); however, only the new prognostic index was associated with 3-year progression (p ≤ 0.036). Multivariate analysis showed that the new prognostic index was associated with 3-year progression but not overall survival. The new prognostic score also distinguished 3-year progression-free survival and overall survival in the low- and low-intermediate-risk groups as well as in the low-intermediate- and high-intermediate-risk groups. Conclusions: The new prognostic score represents a comprehensive prognostic model superior to the IPI. Prospective studies are necessary to explore whether treatment strategies may be adjusted using this new prognostic score.

Keywords:
Computed tomography, Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, Interim positron emission tomography-computed tomography, Non-Hodgkin lymphoma, Positron emission tomography, Prognosis evaluation
© 2018 S. Karger AG, Basel
2018
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.