Background/Aims: An early evaluation with positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) has been demonstrated to be a valuable tool in the prediction of Hodgkin lymphoma's outcome. Herein we report a retrospective study on the outcome of Hodgkin lymphoma treated in accordance with interim FDG-PET results. Methods: 48 patients with de novo Hodgkin lymphoma were treated with 2 cycles of chemotherapy. According to the interim FDG-PET (PET2) evaluation, pre-established treatment was continued if PET2 was considered negative. Patients with a positive PET2 result underwent a salvage therapy. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were chosen as end points. Results: PET2 scan results were negative for 37 patients and positive for 11 patients. After salvage therapy, 7/11 patients were in complete remission and 4 patients had stable disease and were considered for third-line therapy. After a median follow-up of 5.2 years, 46 patients were still alive. The 4-year PFS were 84.5 and 45.4% for PET2-negative and PET2-positive patients, respectively (p = 0.007). In multivariate analysis, PET2 scan and extranodal disease remained relevant on PFS (p = 0.001 and 0.009, respectively). No difference was seen in OS. Conclusion: Our retrospective study suggests that salvage therapy for non-responder Hodgkin lymphoma using interim FDG-PET could improve the PFS of this group of patients.

Keywords:
Decisional PET2 scan, Hodgkin lymphoma, Progression-free survival, Salvage therapy
© 2014 S. Karger AG, Basel
2014
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.