Background: The Follicular Lymphoma International Prognostic Index (FLIPI) allows physicians to stratify patients into groups with distinct prognoses, however its ability to predict the treatment efficacy has not been fully investigated. The aim of this study was to validate on this respect the FLIPI system in an independent cohort and compare it with the International Prognostic Index (IPI) used for aggressive lymphomas. Methods: Records from patients referred to our unit with a diagnosis of follicular lymphoma (FL) were retrospectively reviewed. Data required for FLIPI and IPI scores were collected along with data regarding first-line chemotherapy and time to treatment failure (TTF) and overall survival (OS). Results: Of 162 patients screened, 130 were assessable for both (FLIPI and IPI) scores. OS for low-risk (LR) patients identified either with IPI or FLIPI was significantly longer compared to intermediate-risk (IR) and high-risk (HR) groups, with FLIPI allowing a more even patient distribution among the risk groups. For patients receiving first-line chemotherapy within 6 months of diagnosis, a low FLIPI score was associated with a longer TTF (3-year TTF rates: 68.0, 33.7 and 31.0% for FLIPI-defined LR, IR and HR patients, respectively, p = 0.026). Conclusion: Our data support the prognostic value of both IPI and FLIPI, with FLIPI demonstrating a more convenient patient distribution among risk classes. A low FLIPI score was also associated with a longer TTF. This might partially contribute to a more favourable prognosis.

Keywords:
Follicular lymphoma, Follicular Lymphoma International Prognostic Index, International Prognostic Index, Time to treatment failure
© 2009 S. Karger AG, Basel
2009
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.